Management and documentation of pneumonia - a comparison of patients consulting primary care and emergency care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare management and documentation of vital signs, symptoms and infection severity in pneumonia patients seeking primary care and emergency care without referral. DESIGN: Medical record review of vital signs, examination findings and severity of pneumonia. SETTING: Primary and emergency care. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and forty patients diagnosed with pneumonia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vital signs, examination findings and severity of pneumonia. Assessments of pneumonia severity according to the reviewers, the traffic light score and CRB-65. RESULTS: Respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation were less often documented in primary care (p < .001). Chest X-ray was performed in 5% of primary care patients vs. 88% of emergency care patients (p < .01). Primary care patients had longer symptom duration, higher oxygen saturation and lower respiratory rate. In total, the reviewers assessed 63% of all pneumonias as mild and 9% as severe. The traffic light scoring model identified 11 patients (9%) in primary care and 53 patients (44%) in emergency care at high risk of severe infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vital signs were documented less often in primary care than in emergency care. Patients in primary care appear to have a less severe pneumonia, indicating attendance to the correct care level. The traffic light scoring model identified more patients at risk of severe infection than CRB-65, where the parameters were documented to a limited extent.

Pneumonia patients attending primary care have less affected vital signs than those attending emergency care.Vital signs were less documented in primary care than in emergency care.Patients with pneumonia seem to attend the correct level of care when they have the possibility to choose without a referral.CRB-65 was not possible to count in most primary care patients due to lack of documentation.

Increased incidence of obstetric and perinatal complications in pregnancies achieved using donor oocytes and single embryo transfer in young and healthy women. A prospective hospital-based matched cohort study.

In this single-center matched-cohort study, women who underwent IVF/ICSI with donor oocytes between 2007 and 2014 (n = 259) were compared to women undergoing autologous cycles during the same time period (n = 515). The matching (1:2) took into consideration the women's age, type of treatment (IVF/ICSI), and year of embryo transfer. All women were healthy and below 40 years of age at the time of IVF/ICSI, and the treatments were performed using a strict policy of single embryo transfer. Multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), smoking, and parity, showed a four times increased risk of gestational hypertensive disorders (adjusted odds ratio, AOR 4.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.61-6.92) and pre-eclampsia (AOR 3.99; 95% CI 2.27-7.00) in pregnancies achieved with donor oocytes. There was also a higher rate of cesarean section in women who gave birth after oocyte donation (AOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.22-2.35) and a higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage >1000 mL (AOR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.11-2.27). After further adjustment for preeclampsia in the logistic regression analysis, no additional increased perinatal risks were found. The incidence of preterm delivery, low weight at birth, need of neonatal intensive care, Apgar scores, and incidence of perinatal death were also similar between the groups.

Pregnancy Achieved Using Donor Eggs in Cancer Survivors with Treatment-Induced Ovarian Failure: Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Egg donation is a common fertility treatment in female cancer survivors with reproductive wish and iatrogenic ovarian failure. We examined whether women previously treated for cancer have a higher risk of pregnancy complications after egg donation treatments when compared to women without cancer history. METHODS: In this prospective cohort treated during 2003-2015 at a single center, 31 women with previous history of cancer achieved 25 deliveries and 212 women without cancer history achieved 244 deliveries. All egg donor treatments were performed with a strict policy of single embryo transfer to reduce pregnancy and perinatal complications. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with adjustment for relevant confounders, to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for perinatal and obstetric outcomes. Women without previous history of cancer were used as the reference group in the regression models. RESULTS: Women with a history of cancer presented with a significantly increased risk of pregnancy complications, including preterm birth (aOR 5.54, 95% CI 2.01-15.31) and preeclampsia (aOR 2.79, 95% CI 1.07-7.34), compared to women without cancer history. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the risks of preterm birth and preeclampsia in women with prior cancers who become pregnant by egg donor treatment significantly exceed those of women without cancer history undergoing similar treatments. As pregnancies using donor eggs are already acknowledged of higher risk for hypertensive pathologies, this study alerts toward characterization of specific increased risks in women who are cancer survivors to provide adapted pregnancy monitoring.