Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Toxicol ; 95(12): 3717-3744, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34595563

ABSTRACT

N-vinyl pyrrolidone (NVP) is produced up to several thousand tons per year as starting material for the production of polymers to be used in pharmaceutics, cosmetics and food technology. Upon inhalation NVP was carcinogenic in the rat, liver tumor formation is starting already at the rather low concentration of 5 ppm. Hence, differentiation whether NVP is a genotoxic carcinogen (presumed to generally have no dose threshold for the carcinogenic activity) or a non-genotoxic carcinogen (with a potentially definable threshold) is highly important. In the present study, therefore, the existing genotoxicity investigations on NVP (all showing consistently negative results) were extended and complemented with investigations on possible alternative mechanisms, which also all proved negative. All tests were performed in the same species (rat) using the same route of exposure (inhalation) and the same doses of NVP (5, 10 and 20 ppm) as had been used in the positive carcinogenicity test. Specifically, the tests included an ex vivo Comet assay (so far not available) and an ex vivo micronucleus test (in contrast to the already available micronucleus test in mice here in the same species and by the same route of application as in the bioassay which had shown the carcinogenicity), tests on oxidative stress (non-protein-bound sulfhydryls and glutathione recycling test), mechanisms mediated by hepatic receptors, the activation of which had been shown earlier to lead to carcinogenicity in some instances (Ah receptor, CAR, PXR, PPARα). No indications were obtained for any of the investigated mechanisms to be responsible for or to contribute to the observed carcinogenicity of NVP. The most important of these exclusions is genotoxicity. Thus, NVP can rightfully be regarded and treated as a non-genotoxic carcinogen and threshold approaches to the assessment of this chemical are supported. However, the mechanism underlying the carcinogenicity of NVP in rats remains unclear.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens/toxicity , Liver Neoplasms/chemically induced , Pyrrolidinones/toxicity , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests , Comet Assay , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Micronucleus Tests , Mutagenicity Tests , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar
2.
Mol Nutr Food Res ; 55(3): 387-99, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938989

ABSTRACT

SCOPE: Acrylamide (AA), classified as a genotoxic carcinogen, is generated by heating foods. We studied whether the food matrix modulates bioavailability and/or biotransformation and investigated kinetics and biological effectiveness of AA in rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: AA was given to the animals at a daily intake level of AA containing foods for up to 9 days, resulting in an exposure of 50 or 100 µg AA/kg body weight (b.w.)/day. Positive controls received the same dosages of AA in water, negative controls just water. As biomarkers urinary mercapturic acids, hemoglobin adducts, plasma levels of AA and glycidamide (GA) and DNA integrity in white blood cells and hepatocytes were measured. Altogether, no significant differences in bioavailability of AA from water and the different food matrices were observed. Only with bread crust, biomarkers indicated a slightly reduced bioavailability. Monitoring glycidamide valine adduct adducts did not provide evidence for treatment-related significantly enhanced GA-haemoglobin adduct formation in blood although glycidamide mercapturic acid excretion in urine indicated significant GA formation. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest AA at dietary intake levels, exceeding estimated human mean intake by a factor of at least 100 to become detoxified in Sprague-Dawley rats to a major extent through glutathione coupling.


Subject(s)
Acrylamide/administration & dosage , Acrylamide/toxicity , Carcinogens/toxicity , Eating , Food , Water/administration & dosage , Acetylcysteine/blood , Acetylcysteine/toxicity , Acetylcysteine/urine , Acrylamide/blood , Acrylamide/urine , Animals , Biological Availability , Biomarkers/blood , Biotransformation , Bread , Carcinogens/administration & dosage , Carcinogens/metabolism , DNA Damage , Epoxy Compounds/blood , Epoxy Compounds/toxicity , Epoxy Compounds/urine , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Solanum tuberosum
3.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 18(2): 433-43, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19190172

ABSTRACT

Acrylamide, a potential food carcinogen in humans, is biotransformed to the epoxide glycidamide in vivo. Both acrylamide and glycidamide are conjugated with glutathione, possibly via glutathione-S-transferases (GST), and bind covalently to proteins and nucleic acids. We investigated acrylamide toxicokinetics in 16 healthy volunteers in a four-period change-over trial and evaluated the respective role of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) and GSTs. Participants ingested self-prepared potato chips containing acrylamide (1 mg) without comedication, after CYP2E1 inhibition (500 mg disulfiram, single dose) or induction (48 g/d ethanol for 1 week), and were phenotyped for CYP2E1 with chlorzoxazone (250 mg, single dose). Unchanged acrylamide and the mercapturic acids N-acetyl-S-(2-carbamoylethyl)-cysteine (AAMA) and N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxy-2-carbamoylethyl)-cysteine (GAMA) accounted for urinary excretion [geometric mean (percent coefficient of variation)] of 2.9% (42), 65% (23), and 1.7% (65) of the acrylamide dose in the reference period. Hemoglobin adducts increased clearly following the acrylamide test-meal. The cumulative amounts of acrylamide, AAMA, and GAMA excreted and increases in AA adducts changed significantly during CYP2E1 blockade [point estimate (90% confidence interval)] to the 1.34-fold (1.14-1.58), 1.18-fold (1.02-1.36), 0.44-fold (0.31-0.61), and 1.08-fold (1.02-1.15) of the reference period, respectively, but were not changed significantly during moderate CYP2E1 induction. Individual baseline CYP2E1 activity, CYP2E1*6, GSTP1 313A>G and 341T>C single nucleotide polymorphisms, and GSTM1-and GSTT1-null genotypes had no major effect on acrylamide disposition. The changes in acrylamide toxicokinetics upon CYP2E1 blockade provide evidence that CYP2E1 is a major but not the only enzyme mediating acrylamide epoxidation in vivo to glycidamide in humans. No obvious genetic risks or protective factors in xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes could be determined for exposed subjects.


Subject(s)
Acrylamide/pharmacokinetics , Carcinogens/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2E1/metabolism , Glutathione Transferase/metabolism , Acrylamide/toxicity , Chlorzoxazone/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2E1/genetics , Disulfiram/administration & dosage , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Genotype , Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Humans , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...