Prehabilitation Maximizing Functional Mobility in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Supported on Axillary Impella.

Physical therapy (PT) benefits for critically ill patients are well recognized; however, little data exist on PT in patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support. In this single-center retrospective study (February 2017-January 2022), we analyzed 37 patients who received an axillary Impella device (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) and PT to "prehabilitate" them before durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) implantation. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility tool assessed the functional status at different points during admission. Immediately after Impella placement, the median AM-PAC score was 12.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 9-15), and the scores continued to significantly increase to 18.4 (IQR, 16-23) before dLVAD and up to 20.7 (IQR, 19-24) at discharge, indicating improved independence. No PT-related complications were reported. Thus, we hypothesize that critically ill patients initially deemed equivocal candidates may safely participate in PT while maximizing functional activities before dLVAD placement.

Use of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Before Durable Device Implantation in Patients With Cardiac Cachexia: Case Series.

Frailty and malnutrition in patients with heart failure are barriers to durable left ventricular assist device (D-LVAD) support and heart transplantation. Moreover, cachexia in patients with advanced heart failure carries a high mortality risk. There are no guidelines for these patients other than increased caloric intake and rehabilitation. Patients suffering from cardiac cachexia and heart failure may benefit from temporary, percutaneous assist device support to improve the underlying heart disease and reverse the catabolic state. We retrospectively reviewed patients from January 2017 to January 2022. All patients who received Impella support (5.0 or 5.5, Abiomed) before D-LVAD implantation were screened. Those who met the criteria for cardiac cachexia were included. Patient demographics, nutritional and biochemical markers, and survival data were collected. A total of 14 patients were included. The majority of patients were male (85.7%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (64.3%). Caloric intake, physical strength, and ambulation improved. Prealbumin levels improved from a median of 13.7-18.0 mg/dl ( p < 0.006) while on Impella 5.0 or 5.5 support. All patients survived to discharge and the 6 month follow-up. In conclusion, use of the Impella device improves cardiogenic shock symptoms and, consequently, may improve cachexia status prior to D-LVAD implantation.

Surgically Implanted Impella Device for Patients on Impella CP Support Experiencing Refractory Hemolysis.

The Impella CP (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) is widely used in cardiac catheterization laboratories for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, but it is also known to cause significant hemolysis. The risk of hemolysis can be reduced by properly positioning the device, ensuring an adequate volume status, and using full anticoagulation strategies; however, in some cases hemolysis persists. We present a case series of eight patients that were diagnosed with cardiogenic shock, underwent Impella CP placement, and then suffered from refractory hemolysis which was treated by upgrading the Impella device to the 5.0 or 5.5 version. Fifty percent (4/8) of the patients in this series were already receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, and the levels of plasma free hemoglobin (pFHb) and lactate dehydrogenase continued to increase after the implantation of the Impella CP. The median time between Impella CP placement and the diagnosis of refractory hemolysis was 16.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 8.0-26.0). The median time between the diagnosis of hemolysis to Impella upgrade was 6.0 hours (IQR, 4.0-7.0). A total of 87.5% (7/8) of patients experienced a drop in pFHb to below 40 mg/dl at 72 hours post-Impella upgrade, and they were discharged without any further need of dialysis. One patient expired due to irreversible multiple organ failure. We propose that early identification of hemolysis by close monitoring of pFHb and upgrading to the Impella 5.5 reduces hemolysis, prevents further kidney damage, and significantly improves clinical outcomes.

Is Foot Drop an Underreported Sequela of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?

Foot drop in the absence of limb ischemia is a chronic complication in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) survivors; however, there is little published regarding the incidence and functional outcomes of this condition. Common peroneal nerve is the most common cause of foot drop, a condition that leads to significant debility and requires extensive physical therapy and rehabilitation, thereby affecting the patient's quality of life. We completed a retrospective review of 153 patients who received femoral cannulation for V-A ECMO support for greater than 1 hour. The incidence of foot drop in our V-A ECMO population was 7.8% (12/153). Importantly, only two patients with foot drop were discharged home. The majority (10/12) of patients with foot drop required in-patient rehabilitation; five patients were nonambulatory, and five patients required an ankle foot orthosis assistive device. This study identifies foot drop as a relevant complication in peripherally cannulated V-A ECMO survivors and provides an initial incidence rate. By raising awareness of this complication in the V-A ECMO population, an early diagnosis is possible, which can enable appropriate rehabilitation. Prospective trials are needed to identify possible risk factors of foot drop and methods to reduce this complication of V-A ECMO.

A Nurse's Guide to COVID-19.

ABSTRACT: To assist nurses caring for hospitalized adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the authors synthesize evidence-based information on the disease, providing background on the epidemiology and history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causative virus. They also discuss the risks for severe effects of the illness, the multiple signs and symptoms hospitalized adults with COVID-19 may manifest, and the precautions hospitals should take to keep health care providers and patients safe during the course of this pandemic.