Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 112(4): 864-70, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24969410

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Information regarding the differences in translucency among new ceramic systems is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative translucency of the different types of ceramic systems indicated for porcelain veneers and to evaluate the effect of shade and thickness on translucency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Disk specimens 13 mm in diameter and 0.7-mm thick were fabricated for the following 9 materials (n=5): VITA VM9, IPS Empress Esthetic, VITA PM9, Vitablocks Mark II, Kavo Everest G-Blank, IPS Empress CAD, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.maxPress, and Lava Zirconia. VITA VM9 served as the positive control and Lava as the negative control. The disks were fabricated with the shade that corresponds to A1. For IPS e.maxPress, additional disks were made with different shades (BL2, BL4, A1, B1, O1, O2, V1, V2, V3), thickness (0.3 mm), and translucencies (high translucency, low translucency). Color coordinates (CIE L∗ a∗ b∗) were measured with a tristimulus colorimeter. The translucency parameter was calculated from the color difference of the material on a black versus a white background. One-way ANOVA, the post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference, and the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple range tests were used to analyze the data (α=.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in the translucency parameter were found among porcelains (P<.001) according to the following rank: VM9>PM9, Empress Esthetic>Empress CAD>Mark II, Everest, e.max CAD>e.max Press>Lava. Significant differences also were noted when different shades and thickness were compared (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Different ceramic systems designed for porcelain veneers present varying degrees of translucency. The thickness and shade of lithium disilicate ceramic affect its translucency. Shade affects translucency parameter less than thickness.


Subject(s)
Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Veneers , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Color , Colorimetry/instrumentation , Humans , Light , Materials Testing , Potassium Compounds/chemistry , Prosthesis Coloring , Surface Properties
2.
J Prosthet Dent ; 110(5): 397-401, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23998620

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Different parameters are used in the literature to describe translucency, making it difficult for clinicians to find clear information on ceramic translucency and compare studies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between the contrast ratio (CR) and translucency parameter (TP) when the translucency of different types of ceramic systems is compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Disks 13 mm in diameter and 0.7 mm thick were fabricated for the following materials (n=5): VITA VM9, VITA PM9, IPS Empress CAD, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.maxPress, and Lava Zirconia. VITA VM9 served as positive control, while Lava Zirconia served as negative control. The luminous reflectance (Y) and color coordinates (CIE L* a* b*) of the specimens were measured with a tristimulus colorimeter. The CR (CR=Yb/Yw) was calculated from the reflectance of the light of the material on a black backing (Yb) to the reflectance on a white backing (Yw). The TP (TP=[(Lb*Lw*)(2+)(ab*-aw*)(2+)(bb*-bw*)(2) ](1/2)) was calculated from the color difference of the material on a black versus a white background. One-way ANOVA based on ranked data and the Pearson and Spearman rank correlation tests were used to analyze the data (α=.05). RESULTS: A significant correlation between CR and TP was found when all specimens were included (P<.001). The coefficient of -0.99 indicated a strong decreasing relationship between the 2 variables. CONCLUSIONS: Either CR or TP can be used to evaluate the relative translucency of ceramic systems.


Subject(s)
Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Veneers , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Color , Colorimetry/instrumentation , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Polishing/methods , Humans , Light , Materials Testing , Potassium Compounds/chemistry , Prosthesis Coloring , Surface Properties , Zirconium/chemistry
3.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 25(2): 125-38, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617387

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: Polishing composite resin restorations may lead to marginal defects and gap formation. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of polishing direction on the marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations using two composite resins and two polishing systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human molars were sectioned along their mesio-distal axis. Buccal and lingual enamel was flattened and a triangular preparation, 0.87-mm deep and 3-mm wide, representing two 60° bevels, was performed. Specimens were randomly assigned to eight groups (N = 20) and restored with two composite resins: a nanofilled (Filtek Supreme Ultra, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) or a microhybrid (Point 4, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) and finished with two polishing techniques: polishing discs (Sof-Lex XT, 3M ESPE) or rubber polishers (HiLuster Plus, Kerr, Bioggio, Switzerland). On each specimen, both margins were polished with the same technique, one margin from composite resin to tooth and the other from tooth to composite resin. Replicas were made for field emission scanning electron microscope observation (200×) and quantitative margin analysis was performed based on four criteria. Data were analyzed with a paired-sample t-test, a two-sample t-test, and one-way analysis of variance or their nonparametric analog. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in most groups between polishing directions with better marginal adaptation from composite resin to tooth than from tooth to composite resin. Differences between composite resins and polishing techniques seemed to be dependent on certain combinations of composite resin, polishing technique, and polishing direction. CONCLUSION: Polishing from composite resin to tooth leads to better marginal adaptation than polishing from tooth to composite resin. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results obtained from this in vitro study suggest that polishing direction influences the marginal adaptation of composite resins and that polishing from composite resin to tooth structure should be clinically performed whenever possible on accessible margins to preserve marginal integrity and esthetics.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Polishing/methods , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Humans
4.
J Dent Educ ; 75(6): 823-31, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642529

ABSTRACT

Written and clinical tests compared the change in clinical knowledge and practical clinical skill of first-year dental students watching a clinical video recording of the three-step etch-and-rinse resin bonding system to those using an interactive dental video game teaching the same procedure. The research design was a randomized controlled trial with eighty first-year dental students enrolled in the preclinical operative dentistry course. Students' change in knowledge was measured through written examination using a pre-test and a post-test, as well as clinical tests in the form of a benchtop shear bond strength test. There was no statistically significant difference between teaching methods in regards to change in either knowledge or clinical skills, with one minor exception relating to the wetness of dentin following etching. Students expressed their preference for an interactive self-paced method of teaching.


Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction , Dental Bonding , Dentistry, Operative/education , Education, Dental/methods , Video Games , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Computer Simulation , Dental Stress Analysis , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Female , Humans , Iowa , Male , Program Evaluation , Shear Strength , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , User-Computer Interface , Video Recording , Young Adult
5.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 142 Suppl 2: 20S-4S, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21454837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several all-ceramic restorative systems of various compositions, properties and indications are available to the dental practitioner. Because of the large number of systems, the dental team faces questions and decisions when choosing the appropriate system and the appropriate means of cementation. OVERVIEW: The authors present a brief overview of the cementation options for various types of all-ceramic restorations. In this article, they discuss the cementation of current all-ceramic restorations and make clinical recommendations tailored to each type of ceramic. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The clinician must have a good understanding of the ceramic type to determine whether a restoration should be cemented adhesively or nonadhesively. Other variables, such as isolation and preparation design, also influence the cementation choice. Various ceramic types demand different surface treatments before cementation. Choosing and applying the appropriate surface treatment and cementation procedure will contribute to long-lasting restorations. The literature is lacking in clinical trial results that validate current in vitro data regarding cementation of all-ceramic restorations.


Subject(s)
Cementation/methods , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis , Ceramics/chemistry , Ceramics/classification , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements/classification , Dental Porcelain/classification , Dental Prosthesis Retention/methods , Humans , Surface Properties , Tooth Preparation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...