Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Respir Care ; 68(12): 1693-1700, 2023 Nov 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Insufficient data are available about the noise produced by modern neonatal ventilators. We aimed to measure their noise under different ventilatory modes and parameters. METHODS: This was a bench study measuring the noise produced by 9 neonatal ventilators set in conventional or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), nasal mask-delivered CPAP with variable- or continuous-flow configuration, or bi-level positive airway pressure (considered as noninvasive ventilation [NIV]). Conventional ventilation and HFOV were tested in 2 distinct settings with moderate or higher parameters. Sound measurements were performed inside and outside an incubator mimicking the clinical setting and using a high-end meter meeting the international ISO 226:2003 standard. RESULTS: Four ventilators remained below the internationally recommended safety threshold but only for measurements outside the incubator. Conventional ventilation (49.1 [3.4] dBA) and HFOV (56.3 [5.2] dBA) were the least and most noisy respiratory support technique, respectively. Noise was greater inside than outside the incubators (P < .0001) and different between the ventilators (P < .0001); better results were achieved by Servo-u and Fabian family devices for conventional ventilation; by fabian HFO for HFOV; and by Servo-u, VN500, and fabian family devices for CPAP and NIV. Noise levels were similar when using moderate or higher parameters in conventional ventilation (P = .81) and in HFOV (P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Modern ventilators often produce relevant noise, independent of the respiratory support modality, with acceptable noise levels being measured only outside the incubator. Better results were achieved with Servo-u, VN500, and Fabian family devices.


Subject(s)
High-Frequency Ventilation , Respiration, Artificial , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Incubators , Ventilators, Mechanical , Lung
3.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 5(6): ytab114, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34222777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulability and a high rate of thrombosis. Few cases of coronary stent thrombosis associated with COVID-19 have been reported. CASE SUMMARY: In this report, we describe the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) who was admitted following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest related to an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction revealing a very late dual coronary stent thrombosis of the left anterior descending and posterior descending arteries. Ten days prior to admission, he was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia and treated with dexamethasone, which led to rapid clinical improvement. After resuscitation, coronary angiography revealed an acute thrombotic occlusion in the two previous drug-eluting stents (implanted in 2010 and 2018), with a high thrombus burden. He was successfully treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. The patient did not present any further complications during his hospital stay and was transferred to a cardiac rehabilitation centre. DISCUSSION: Dual stent thrombosis is an exceptional event highlighting the high procoagulant state promoted by coronavirus 19. This case suggests that strengthening of antithrombotic therapy in CAD patients presenting with COVID-19 should be discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...