Asthma control in patients on fixed dose combination evaluated with mannitol challenge test.

Asthma is often difficult to control and it is likely that not all patients are optimally treated. This study aimed to explore asthma control in adults receiving fixed dose combination (FDC) therapy. Control of asthma was assessed using the mannitol challenge test as a monitoring tool to see if this would give additional information compared to the asthma control test (ACT). The study was an open-label, prospective study on 98 adults prescribed with FDC therapies for at least three months. 74 patients considered that their asthma was well controlled. However, 60 patients had a positive mannitol challenge test (PD15 < 635 mg), and when those with a positive response to the short-acting ß2-agonist (≥15%) after the mannitol challenge test were included, this increased to 64 patients (65%). Exploratory analysis determined that the spirometry parameters; FEV1/FVC and FEV1% of predicted, were statistically significant predictors of a positive mannitol challenge test. Co-morbid conditions such as concomitant upper airway involvement or eczema did not predict mannitol reactivity. Although most patients rated their asthma as well controlled, many provided a positive mannitol challenge test, suggesting the presence of underlying inflammation, despite treatment with fixed dose combination therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of transdermal buprenorphine patch in the elderly.

PURPOSE: Transdermal buprenorphine patches provide comparable pain relief to that of low-potency opioids in elderly individuals. However, specific data on their use in elderly individuals is limited. This study investigated and compared the PK of buprenorphine transdermal patches in elderly (≥ 75 years) versus younger (50-60 years) individuals. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, open-label, parallel-group study in healthy volunteers split into two age groups (younger, 50-60 years; elderly, ≥ 75 years) with 37 individuals in each. Study participants received two consecutive 7-day buprenorphine 5 µg/h transdermal patch applications, and blood samples were collected on the week of the second patch application [day 7 (predose), days 8, 9, 10, 12, and 14] to determine PK at steady state. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine. Safety was assessed by analyzing adverse events, hematology, clinical chemistry, urine analysis, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), and physical examinations. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady state (AUC(tau)), measured over one dosing interval, was similar for elderly [mean ± standard deviation (SD) 9,940 pg/h/ml (4,827 pg/h/ml] and younger [mean ± SD 11,309 (3,670 pg/h/ml] individuals. Bioequivalence was not demonstrated between groups, which may be attributable to the relatively high level of variability in individual plasma profiles. More adverse events were reported by younger (216) than elderly (164) study participants. CONCLUSIONS: No dosage alterations are necessary for PK reasons when treating elderly people with buprenorphine transdermal patches.

The direct and indirect costs of opioid-induced constipation.

CONTEXT: Treatment with strong opioids is connected with frequent and problematic side effects. One of the most common side effects is opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The discomfort of OIC can limit the effectiveness of pain therapy. Because constipation typically persists for as long as opioid therapy is administered, its effects on the quality of life (QoL) of patients need to be taken seriously. Data and published studies on the cost implications of OIC are, however, scarce. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct and indirect costs of OIC in a defined patient population during treatment with strong opioids. METHODS: The study is based on patient data from a Swedish noninterventional study, UPPSIKT. The cost analysis is based on 197 patients treated with strong opioids over a six-month period. Direct and indirect costs in this article are calculated per patient-month, and the cost for OIC is estimated as the difference in mean costs between months with and without constipation. RESULTS: The total costs per patient-month for patients with severe constipation are significantly higher than those for patients with mild, moderate, or no constipation. Patients with severe constipation have the highest total costs, Euro (EUR) 1525 per patient-month, whereas patients with mild, moderate, and no problems cost EUR 1196, EUR 1088, and EUR 1034, respectively. CONCLUSION: Opioid use is costly to society, and the costs vary with OIC severity. OIC is discomforting, affects the QoL of patients, and can limit an effective pain therapy.

Performance evaluation of a turbidimetric cystatin C assay on different high-throughput platforms.

OBJECTIVE: The goal with this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of a new cystatin C immunoassay (Tina-quant a Cystatin C, Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The evaluation was carried out at four centers according to a standardized protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Tina-quant a Cystatin C is a latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay. Roche cobas 6000, MODULAR ANALYTICS SWA and COBAS INTEGRA instruments were included in the study. Method comparison studies were carried out against two turbidimetric methods (Dako Cystatin C, Gentian Cystatin C), and one nephelometric method (Siemens N-Latex Cystatin C). RESULTS: Linearity was proven throughout the measuring range from 0.4 to 8 mg/L. Within-run CVs ranged from 0.7-2.8%, and total CVs from 1.4-4.7 % (concentration range 0.6-3.9 mg/L). Comparable results were obtained with paired serum and Li-heparinate plasma samples. Good agreement was achieved in the comparisons between the Tina-quant a Cystatin C assay and the other commercially available cystatin C assays, two different turbidimetric methods (slope range 0.88-1.04, intercept < 0.17 mg/L, r > or = 0.993) and one nephelometric assay (slope range 0.90-1.05, intercept < 0.21 mg/L, r > or = 0.986). CONCLUSIONS: The Tina-quant a Cystatin C assay was shown to be precise and accurate with proven linearity over the measuring range. Good comparability was obtained with other commercially available assays for the determination of cystatin C. The Tina-quant a Cystatin C assay is very well suited for clinical use on routine clinical chemistry analysers to detect renal dysfunction with a 24 h availability.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches and prolonged-release tramadol tablets in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain of the hip and/or knee. METHODS: Eligible patients were adults with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of OA of the hip and/or knee and moderate to severe pain, as confirmed by a mean Box Scale 11 (BS-11) score >or=4 while using paracetamol 4000 mg/d for pain during the screening week. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches (patch strengths of 5, 10, and 20 microg/h, with a maximum dosage of 20 microg/h) or twice-daily prolonged-release tramadol tablets (tablet strengths of 75, 100, 150, and 200 mg, with a maximum dosage of 400 mg/d) over a 12-week open-label treatment period. Supplementary paracetamol was available as rescue medication throughout the study. The primary end point was the difference in BS-11 scores from baseline to the completion of treatment. Noninferiority was assumed if the treatment difference on the BS-11 scale was -1.5 boxes, indicating a clinically meaningful result. Secondary efficacy variables were rescue medication use, sleep disturbance and quality of sleep, and patients' and investigators' global assessments of pain relief. In addition, patient preference was assessed at the completion visit by asking patients whether, given equal pain relief, they would prefer basic treatment for OA pain with a patch applied once weekly or a tablet taken twice daily. Exploratory variables included investigators' assessments of patients' pain, stiffness, and ability to perform daily activities (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index); patients' quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D health states index and EuroQol visual analog scale); and abuse and diversion of study drug. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients (69 receiving 7-day buprenorphine patches and 65 receiving tramadol tablets) were randomized and received >or=1 dose of study medication. A respective 98.6% and 100% of the 2 treatment groups were white, with mean (SD) ages of 64.4 (11.1) and 64.2 (9.3) years. Both treatments were associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain from baseline to study completion. The least squares mean change from baseline in BS-11 scores in the 7-day buprenorphine patch and tramadol tablet groups was -2.26 (95% CI, -2.76 to -1.76) and -2.09 (95% CI, -2.61 to -1.58). The efficacy of 7-day buprenorphine patches was noninferior to that of prolonged-release tramadol tablets. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in the 2 treatment groups: 226 AEs were reported in 61 patients (88.4%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group, and 152 AEs were reported in 51 patients (78.5%) in the tramadol group. Ten patients (14.5%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 19 (29.2%) in the tramadol tablet group withdrew from the study due to AEs. The most common AEs in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group were nausea (30.4%), constipation (18.8%), and dizziness (15.9%); the most common AEs in the tramadol tablet group were nausea (24.6%), fatigue (18.5%), and pain (12.3%). Most patients (47/67 [70.1%] in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 43/61 [70.5%] in the tramadol tablet group) reported that they would prefer a 7-day patch to a twice-daily tablet for future pain treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients with chronic, moderate to severe OA pain of the hip and/or knee, 7-day low-dose buprenorphine patches were an effective and well-tolerated analgesic. The buprenorphine patches were noninferior to prolonged-release tramadol tablets. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials number: 2006-003233-32.