A Problem-Based Learning Session on Pregnancy Options, Counseling, and Abortion Care.

Introduction: Before their clinical rotations, medical students have limited exposure to women's health issues, particularly abortion. Methods: We piloted a problem-based learning (PBL) module to introduce second-year medical students at the University of Louisville School of Medicine to counseling patients about pregnancy options. Students were divided into groups of 10 and met for two 2-hour sessions. In the first session, learners were presented with a case about a woman diagnosed with Zika virus who was considering pregnancy termination. Students discussed the case and developed learning objectives to research. One week later, students reconvened and shared what they had learned individually. Students were asked to complete pre- and post-PBL surveys. PBL facilitators also completed a survey evaluating the module. Results: Fifty-eight percent of students felt informed or very informed about abortion after the PBL, compared to 30% before (p < .001). Students' mean quiz score increased from 29% on the pretest to 40% on the posttest (p < .001). Ninety-three percent of facilitators believed this PBL provided students with tools to better counsel about abortion, but only 56% of faculty felt adequately trained to facilitate this discussion. Discussion: Students appreciated this PBL as an opportunity to discuss pregnancy options counseling and to clarify their own values surrounding abortion provision. Despite their positive response to the module, students identified barriers that would prevent them from implementing knowledge learned from this module in practice.

A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement.

BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a safe, long-acting, highly effective method of birth control. Two-visit protocols for IUD insertion may represent a barrier to IUD uptake. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective database review. We identified Medicaid-insured women who requested IUDs in our urban university-based clinic, which employed a two-visit protocol for IUD insertion. The number of women who returned for IUD insertion was determined. To compare women who underwent insertion to those who did not, bivariate and multivariable analyses were used. RESULTS: Of the 708 women who requested IUDs at the initial visit, only 385 had an IUD inserted (54.4%). Single women were less likely to return for IUD placement compared to women who had ever been married (52.4% vs. 70.3%; p<.01). Patients who ordered IUDs at gynecologic visits were more likely to return as opposed to those who had them ordered at obstetrics-related visits (60.5% vs. 50.2%; p<.01). Women who lived >10 miles away from the clinic were less likely to return for IUD insertion than women who lived <10 miles away from the clinic (45.3% vs. 56.2%; p=.03). Race, age and type of IUD ordered were not significantly associated with probability of insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of women who ordered IUDs did not return for insertion, suggesting that two-visit protocols hinder a woman's ability to have an IUD placed. We must eliminate barriers to IUD insertion.

Does ethnicity influence in vitro fertilization (IVF) birth outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ethnicity influences IVF birth outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-based IVF program. PATIENT(S): All African American women (n = 71) and Caucasian women (n = 180) who underwent initial fresh, nondonor IVF/embryo transfer (ET) cycles between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2005. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation, peak estradiol levels, oocyte yield, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. RESULT(S): African American women generated significantly fewer embryos than Caucasian women (5.3 +/- 3.7 vs. 6.6 +/- 4.8) despite having similar ages, day 3 FSH, peak estradiol levels, length of stimulation, and number of oocytes retrieved. In addition, compared with Caucasian women, African American had significantly greater body mass indices (26.5 +/- 5.2 vs. 23.7 +/- 4.8) and required significantly more total gonadotropin (IU) (4,791 +/- 2,161 vs. 3,725 +/- 2,005) for ovarian stimulation. African American women were more likely to have uterine fibroids (21% vs. 3%) and tubal factor infertility (23% vs. 9%). Caucasian women were more likely to have unexplained infertility (53% vs. 32%). Differences in embryo yield between patient groups persisted after accounting for differences in infertility diagnosis and prevalence of fibroids. Biochemical, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates as well as implantation rates (number of sacs visualized/number of embryos transferred) did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSION(S): Although African Americans yield fewer embryos than Caucasian women with IVF, these ethnic groups do not seem to differ with regard to IVF pregnancy outcomes.