A new grading for easy and concise description of functional status after spinal cord lesions.

BACKGROUND: Disability scales do not enable the transmission of concise, meaningful and daily function description for clinical purposes. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional statistical analysis of 328 patients' Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III item scores (SIS). OBJECTIVE: To develop a concise and clinically interpretable data-based characterization of daily task accomplishment for patients with spinal cord lesions (SCLs). SETTING: Multi-center study at 13 spinal units in 6 countries. METHODS: Patients were grouped into clusters characterized by smaller differences between the patients' SIS within the clusters than between their centers, using the k-medoides algorithm. The number of clusters (k) was chosen according to the percent of SIS variation they explained and the clinical distinction between them. RESULTS: Analysis showed that k=8 SIS clusters offer a good description of the patient population. The eight functional clusters were designated as A-H, each cluster (grade) representing a combination of task accomplishments. Higher grades were usually (but not always) associated with patients implementing more difficult tasks. Throughout rehabilitation, the patients' functional grade improved and the distribution of patients with similar functional grades within the total SCIM III score deciles remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: A new classification based on SIS clusters enables a concise description of overall functioning and task accomplishment distribution in patients with SCL. A software tool is used to identify the patients' functional grade. Findings support the stability and utility of the grades for characterizing the patients' functional status.

Expected spinal cord independence measure, third version, scores for various neurological levels after complete spinal cord lesions.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter international cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish target values for Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III scoring in rehabilitation for clinically complete spinal cord lesion (SCL) neurological levels. SETTING: In total, 13 spinal cord units in six countries from North America, Europe and the Middle East were taken. METHODS: Total SCIM III scores and gain at discharge from rehabilitation were calculated for SCL levels in 128 patients with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A on admission to rehabilitation. RESULTS: Median, quartiles, mean and s.d., values of discharge SCIM III scores and SCIM III gain for the various SCL levels are presented. Total SCIM III scores and gain were significantly correlated with the SCL level (r=0.730, r=0.579, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Calculated discharge SCIM III scores can be used as target values for functional achievements at various neurological levels in patients after AIS A SCL. They are generally, but not always, inversely correlated with SCL level.

SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions.

STUDY DESIGN: A multi-center international cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the third version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III), separately for patients with traumatic spinal cord lesions (SCLs). SETTING: A total of 13 spinal cord units in six countries from North America, Europe and the Middle-East. METHODS: SCIM III and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were assessed for 261 patients with traumatic SCLs, on admission to rehabilitation and before discharge, by two raters. Conventional statistical measures were used to evaluate the SCIM III reliability and validity. RESULTS: In almost all SCIM III tasks, the total agreement between the paired raters was >80%. The κ coefficients were all >0.6 and statistically significant. Pearson's coefficients of the correlations between the paired raters were >0.9, the mean differences between raters were nonsignificant and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥ 0.95. Cronbach's α values for the entire SCIM III scale were 0.833-0.835. FIM and SCIM III total scores were correlated (r=0.84, P<0.001). SCIM III was more responsive to changes than FIM. In all subscales, SCIM III identified more changes in function than FIM, and in 3 of the 4 subscales, differences in responsiveness were statistically significant (P<0.02). CONCLUSION: The results confirm the reliability and validity of SCIM III for patients with traumatic SCLs in a number of countries.

The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study.

PURPOSE: To examine the third version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) for reliability and validity in a multi-center cohort study. METHOD: Four hundred and twenty-five patients with spinal cord lesions from 13 spinal cord units in six countries from three continents were assessed with SCIM III and the Functional Independence measure (FIM) on admission to rehabilitation and before discharge. RESULTS: Total agreement between raters was above 80% in most SCIM III tasks, and all kappa coefficients were statistically significant (P<0.001). The coefficients of Pearson correlation between the paired raters were above 0.9, and intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.94. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.7. The coefficient of Pearson correlation between FIM and SCIM III was 0.790 (P<0.01). SCIM III was more responsive to changes than FIM in the subscales of Respiration and sphincter management and Mobility indoors and outdoors. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the reliability and validity of SCIM III in a multi-cultural setup. Despite several limitations of the study, the results indicate that SCIM III is an efficient measure for functional assessment of SCL patients and can be safely used for clinical and research trials, including international multi-center studies.

Inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association standards.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. AIM: To examine inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) standards. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Results of ASIA motor and sensory examinations performed by two experienced examiners on 45 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared. RESULTS: Total ASIA scores showed very strong correlation between the two examiners, with Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.96, P<0.01 for total motor, light touch and pin prick scores. The agreement for individual muscle testing of the 10 ASIA key muscles showed substantial agreement for majority of muscles, with the weighted Kappa coefficient range 0.649-0.993, P<0.05. The overall agreement in assignment of manual muscle testing grades (0-5) was 82% on the right and 84% on the left, with the strongest agreement for grade '0' and the weakest for grade '3'. The unweighted Kappa coefficient for agreement in motor and sensory levels ranged from 0.68 to 0.78 (P<0.01). There was no difference in ASIA impairment grades derived from the two examiners' results. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results showed very good levels of agreement in ASIA clinical examinations between two experienced examiners. The established degree of variability due to inter-rater differences should be taken into account in study design of clinical trials with more than one assessor..

A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation.

BACKGROUND: A third version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III), made up of three subscales, was formulated following comments by experts from several countries and Rasch analysis performed on the previous version. OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of SCIM III using Rasch analysis. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Thirteen spinal cord units in six countries from North America, Europe, and the Middle-East. SUBJECTS: 425 patients with spinal cord lesions (SCL). INTERVENTIONS: SCIM III assessments by professional staff members. Rasch analysis of admission scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCIM III subscale match between the distribution of item difficulty grades and the patient ability measurements; reliability of patient ability measures; fit of data to Rasch model requirements; unidimensionality of each subscale; hierarchical ordering of categories within items; differential item functioning across classes of patients and across countries. RESULTS: Results supported the compatibility of the SCIM subscales with the stringent Rasch requirements. Average infit mean-square indices were 0.79-1.06; statistically distinct strata of abilities were 3 to 4; most thresholds between adjacent categories were properly ordered; item hierarchy was stable across most of the clinical subgroups and across countries. In a few items, however, misfit or category threshold disordering were found. CONCLUSIONS: The scores of each SCIM III subscale appear as a reliable and useful quantitative representation of a specific construct of independence after SCL. This justifies the use of SCIM in clinical research, including cross-cultural trials. The results also suggest that there is merit in further refining the scale.

Perceptual threshold to cutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a quantitative sensory test (QST) that could be used for assessing the level and the density (degree of impairment) of spinal cord injury (SCI) and for monitoring neurological changes in patients with SCI. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. METHODS: Perceptual threshold to 3 Hz cutaneous electrical stimulation was measured in 30 control subjects and in 45 patients with SCI at American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) sensory key points for selected dermatomes between C3 and S2 bilaterally. Electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) was recorded as the lowest ascending stimulus intensity out of three tests at which the subject reported sensation. The level of SCI according to EPT results was established for right and left sides as the most caudal spinal segment at which patient's EPT was within the control range (mean +/- 2 standard deviation (SD)). The level of SCI, according to EPT, was then compared with clinical sensory level derived according to ASIA classification. RESULTS: In the control group, EPT depended on the dermatome tested and was lowest for T1 (1.01 +/- 0.23 mA, mean +/- SD) and highest for L5 (3.32 +/- 1.14 mA). There was strong correlation between corresponding right and left dermatomes and between repeated assessments. In the SCI group, the level of lesion according to EPT and clinical testing was the same in 43 of the 90 tests (48%). In 37 cases (41%), the EPT level was higher than the clinical level, and in 10 cases (11%), it was lower. Below the level of lesion in incomplete SCI and in the zone of partial preservation in complete SCI, the EPT values in most dermatomes were raised compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: EPT is a simple, reproducible QST that can assess both the level and the density of SCI. It seems to add sensitivity and resolution to the standard clinical testing and could be a useful adjunct in longitudinal monitoring of patients with SCI for research purposes during natural recovery and therapeutic interventions. SPONSORSHIP: International Spinal Research Trust (ISRT), UK, Grant CLI001.

Towards improved clinical and physiological assessments of recovery in spinal cord injury: a clinical initiative.

Clinical practice and scientific research may soon lead to treatments designed to repair spinal cord injury. Repair is likely to be partial in the first trials, extending only one or two segments below the original injury. Furthermore, treatments that are becoming available are likely to be applied to the thoracic spinal cord to minimise loss of function resulting from damage to surviving connections. These provisos have prompted research into the improvement of clinical and physiological tests designed (1) to determine the level and density of a spinal cord injury, (2) to provide reliable monitoring of recovery over one or two spinal cord segments, and (3) to provide indices of function provided by thoracic spinal root innervation, presently largely ignored in assessment of spinal cord injury. This article reviews progress of the Clinical Initiative, sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust, to advance the clinical and physiological tests of sensory, motor and autonomic function needed to achieve these aims.

Predicting normal lung function in patients with childhood spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the height and arm span measurements in childhood spinal cord injured (SCI) people and examine the subsequent effect on calculating the predicted lung function using standard formulae and to discuss which of the two measurements is the most appropriate to use in these formulae. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK. METHOD: A total of 12 children had lung function tests performed and at the same time had height and armspan measured. The predicted lung function was calculated twice; once using height and then using arm span and compared. The actual lung function test results were expressed as percentage of the two predicted values, respectively, and compared. RESULTS: The difference between the mean height (1499 mm) and arm span (1649 mm) measurements was significant (P<0.001). In all cases, the arm span measurement was greater than the height. The two predicted lung function values (one calculated using height and the other armspan) were significantly different (P<0.001). When lung function test results were expressed as percentage of the two predicted values they gave a very different interpretation of the results. The actual performance was much lower than the predicted values if arm span, rather than height, was used in prediction equations. CONCLUSION: In childhood SCI, the difference in height and arm span is significant. This affects the predicted lung function values significantly and thus changes the interpretation of the lung function test results. The most appropriate measurement to use in prediction equations (height or arm span) in these subjects is yet to be decided.

The effect of childhood spinal cord injury on skeletal development: a retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical review. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between late spinal deformity in childhood onset spinal cord injury (SCI) and level of spinal cord lesion, severity of lesion, age at onset, duration of paralysis and pelvic deformities. SETTING: People with spinal cord injury (onset in childhood) treated and followed up at the National Spinal Injuries Center (identified from case notes review, contacted and agreed to participate). METHOD: One hundred and eighty-nine subjects satisfying study inclusion criteria (acute onset SCI before the 16th birthday) were identified by case note review of 8200 records. Eighty formed the group attending for clinical review including whole spine radiographs (AP and lateral). Clinical examination included neurological status and joint range of movements. Demographic data was recorded. RESULTS: Scoliosis occurred more frequently and was more severe in those injured at a younger age, 38 degrees, compared with 24 degrees in those injured later (P<0.05), in paraplegia, 33 degrees, versus tetraplegia, 17 degrees, (P<0.01) and in complete, 36 degrees, versus incomplete lesions, 18 degrees, (P<0.001). Lordosis angulation in paraplegic subjects was significantly greater than in tetraplegic subjects in both seated, 50 degrees versus 25 degrees (P<0.014) and standing subjects 78 degrees versus 59 degrees (P<0.017) respectively and for kyphosis in standing subjects, 52 degrees versus 31 degrees (P<0.01). Sagittal measurements were influenced by habitual posture (which also corresponded to the severity of the lesion). CONCLUSION: Younger age at onset was shown to be associated with more severe scoliosis, as has been reported by others. Subjects with paraplegia and complete lesions demonstrated a greater and more frequently occurring scoliosis than those with tetraplegia and incomplete lesions respectively. Lordosis was greater in those with paraplegia than with tetraplegia and in those with very incomplete lesions compared with complete lesions. However the influence of the severity of the lesion cannot be separated from the postural position when analyzing spinal deformity.

Physical ability in relation to anthropometric measurements in persons with complete spinal cord lesion below the sixth cervical segment.

A study was undertaken to determine the ability of patients with complete tetraplegia below cervical sixth segment to transfer in relation to their anthropometric characteristics. Thirty-six chronic patients were assessed and spasticity was measured. A discriminant function analysis was carried out to assess the extent to which a number of anthropometric and anatomical variables could predict the patients' final ability to effect a transfer. Using nine of the original 23 predictor variables it is possible to correctly classify a patient's eventual ability to transfer in 92% of cases.