Open surgical retrieval of a migrated patent foramen ovale closure device from the descending aorta following failed percutaneous retrieval from the aortic arch: a case report with a word of caution.

Background: Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is considered safe and has been used widely for over 25 years. A rare but potentially life-threatening complication is device migration, especially to the aorta. Case summary: We present a 30-year-old male with a PFO occlusion device implanted for cryptogenic stroke, which asymptomatically migrated to the aortic arch. A percutaneous retrieval attempt failed at complete removal but relocated the device to the proximal descending aorta. It was then successfully removed by open surgery. Severe intimal damage necessitated resection and interposition grafting. Discussion: Manipulation of migrated intravascular devices can cause intimal damage and subsequent complications, such as local dissections. We advocate caution with percutaneous removal of such large, migrated closure devices to avoid additional intimal damage, especially after endothelialization has occurred. The interventional cardiologist should be aware of the risk of intimal damage as a result, and surgical removal, though invasive, should always be considered.

Ventricular septal defect following port-access mechanical mitral valve replacement.

Interventricular septum defects are a known complication after an aortic valve replacement, but not after mitral surgery. We present a case of a 65-year-old female who underwent unsuccessful mitral valvuloplasty through port-access surgery, followed by uneventful mechanical bioprosthesis replacement. Postoperatively, the patient experienced multiple arrhythmias and recovered poorly. A systolic murmur led to echocardiography, showing an interventricular septum rupture. This was closed with 2 polypropylene pledgeted mattress sutures, via the right atrium and tricuspid valve through midsternal access. The authors believe that the most likely cause is tearing of 2 deeply placed adjacent sutures in the septum, creating localized weakening of the septum susceptible to further rupture. We therefore underline the importance of adequate exposure, especially at the notorious anterior annulus.

The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the literature on traumatic foot fractures: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate foot function is paramount in daily activities, yet the incidence of foot fractures shows a rising trend. Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used for research; however, the use of a wide variety of available instruments is undesirable. In the current study, an overview is provided of patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical research evaluating outcomes of foot fractures. Tools are provided to choose the most adequate instrument in future research. METHODS: To identify the instruments, a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles published since 2000, reporting on traumatic foot fractures and/or their posttraumatic sequelae, and using a minimum of one condition- or region-specific patient-reported outcome measure were included. Forty-nine instruments were identified, used 636 times collectively. These instruments were evaluated on frequency of use, bones or joints analyzed with the instruments, the type and amount of contained items, and existing literature on their psychometric properties. RESULTS: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was used predominantly (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; n = 243, 38.2%), followed by the Maryland Foot Score (n = 90, 14.2%). Twenty-seven instruments were included for further analysis. The majority included questions on mobility (27/27) and pain (24/27). Tools to select an adequate instrument for new research are presented in the appendices. DISCUSSION: Controversy surrounds the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale as other authors have found that its psychometric properties, indicating it measures what it is supposed to measure adequately, are flawed. CONCLUSION: A multitude of specific patient-reported outcome measures concerning foot fractures exists. Furthermore, the predominantly used instrument is deemed insufficient regarding quality as found by other studies. A valid, reliable, and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for clinical research on foot fractures is necessary. The most adequate existing ones for future research on different topics can be found through the tools provided.

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Post-Traumatic Arthrosis Undergoing Open or Arthroscopic Talocrural Arthrodesis-A Retrospective Cohort With Prospective Follow-Up.

Fusion remains the gold standard for post-traumatic osteoarthritis after ankle fractures in many institutes. Patient-reported outcomes on long-term quality of life and functionality of talocrural arthrodesis remain relatively unknown. In literature, low patient numbers and inadequate outcome measures provide a poor foundation for patient expectation management. Additionally, the surgical approach is often omitted. This study presents a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent open or arthroscopic talocrural arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis between 2008 and 2019 with prospective follow-up by questionnaire. Participants completed the EuroQol 5-dimensional 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3LTM), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VASTM), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score Dutch Language Version (FAOS-DLV), and 4 additional questions. Thirty-five patients were included in the cohort and 32 were included for follow-up. Trauma mechanism was mainly a low fall or motor vehicle accident causing a talocrural fracture-dislocation in most cases. For open versus arthroscopic treatment respectively, patients reported a median EQ-5D-3LTM index of 0.775 and 0.775, EQ-VASTM of 80 and 88, FAOS-DLV of 57.0 and 63.9, and satisfaction of 90 and 88 out of 100 after a median of 6.0 and 6.5 years. This study is unique as it is the largest series on patient-reported outcomes in patients with post-traumatic arthrosis with validated questionnaires. In general, patients were satisfied with relatively high questionnaire scores, especially concerning pain and daily living. These functional scores are of importance when setting patient expectations regarding talocrural arthrodesis and recovery. Additionally, the subscale values may help preoperatively in weighing the intervention's advantages and disadvantages for individual patients.