Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 34(2): 199-205, 2009 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19139672

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To determine prevalence rates of spondylolysis, isthmic, and degenerative spondylolisthesis in an unselected adult community-based population; and to evaluate the association of spondylolysis, isthmic, and degenerative spondylolisthesis with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are prevalent in the general population; however, the relationship between these conditions and LBP is controversial. METHODS: This study was an ancillary project to the Framingham Heart Study. A sample of 3529 participants of the Framingham Heart Study aged 40 to 80 years underwent multidetector CT imaging to assess aortic calcification. One hundred eighty-eight individuals were consecutively enrolled in this study to assess radiographic features potentially associated with LBP. The occurrence of LBP in the preceding 12 months was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire. The presence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was characterized by CT imaging. We used multiple logistic regression models to examine the association between spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and LBP, while adjusting for gender, age, and BMI. RESULTS: Twenty-one study subjects demonstrated spondylolysis on computed tomography (CT) imaging. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 3:1. Twenty-one percent of subjects with bilateral spondylolytic defects demonstrated no measurable spondylolisthesis. The male-to-female ratio of degenerative spondylolisthesis was 1:3, and the prevalence of degenerative spondylolisthesis increased from the fifth through 8 decades of life. Thirty-eight subjects (20.4%) reported significant LBP. No significant association was identified between spondylolysis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis, and the occurrence of LBP. CONCLUSION: Based on CT imaging of an unselected community-based population, the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis is 11.5%, nearly twice the prevalence of previous plain radiograph-based studies. This study did not reveal a significant association between the observation of spondylolysis on CT and the occurrence of LBP, suggesting that the condition does not seem to represent a major cause of LBP in the general population.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Spondylolisthesis/epidemiology , Spondylolisthesis/pathology , Spondylolysis/epidemiology , Spondylolysis/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Causality , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylolysis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 33(23): 2560-5, 2008 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18923337

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between lumbar spine facet joint osteoarthritis (FJ OA) identified by multidetector computed tomography (CT) and low back pain (LBP) in the community-based Framingham Heart Study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The association between lumbar FJ OA and LBP remains unclear. METHODS: This study was an ancillary project to the Framingham Heart Study. A sample of 3529 participants of the Framingham Heart Study aged 40 to 80 underwent multidetector CT imaging to assess aortic calcification. One hundred eighty-eight individuals were consecutively enrolled in this ancillary study to assess radiographic features associated with LBP. LBP in the preceding 12 months was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire. FJ OA was evaluated on CT scans using a 4-grade scale. The association between FJ OA and LBP was examined used multiple logistic regression models, while adjusting for gender, age, and BMI. RESULTS: CT imaging revealed a high prevalence of FJ OA (59.6% of males and 66.7% of females). Prevalence of FJ OA increases with age. By decade, FJ OA was present in 24.0% of <40-years-olds, 44.7% of 40- to 49-years-olds, 74.2% of 50- to 59-years-olds, 89.2% of 60- to 69-year-olds, and 69.2% of >70-years-olds. By spinal level the prevalence of FJ OA was: 15.1% at L2-L3, 30.6% at L3-L4, 45.1% at L4-L5, and 38.2% at L5-S1. In this community-based population, individuals with FJ OA at any spinal level showed no association with LBP. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of FJ OA in the community. Prevalence of FJ OA increases with age with the highest prevalence at the L4-L5 spinal level. At low spinal levels women have a higher prevalence of lumbar FJ OA than men. In the present study, we failed to find an association between FJ OA, identified by multidetector CT, at any spinal level and LBP in a community-based study population.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/complications , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Osteoarthritis/complications , Zygapophyseal Joint/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Prevalence , Radiography , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...