Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
JACC Adv ; 3(4)2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694996

ABSTRACT

Calcific aortic stenosis can be considered a model for geriatric cardiovascular conditions due to a confluence of factors. The remarkable technological development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement was studied initially on older adult populations with prohibitive or high-risk for surgical valve replacement. Through these trials, the cardiovascular community has recognized that stratification of these chronologically older adults can be improved incrementally by invoking the concept of frailty and other geriatric risks. Given the complexity of the aging process, stratification by chronological age should only be the initial step but is no longer sufficient to optimally quantify cardiovascular and noncardiovascular risk. In this review, we employ a geriatric cardiology lens to focus on the diagnosis and the comprehensive management of aortic stenosis in older adults to enhance shared decision-making with patients and their families and optimize patient-centered outcomes. Finally, we highlight knowledge gaps that are critical for future areas of study.

2.
J Card Fail ; 2024 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Palliative care (PC) is an essential component of high-quality care for people with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, little is known about the current state of PC education in CVD training, including attitudes toward integration of PC into training and implementation of PC by the program's leadership. METHODS: We developed a nationwide, cross-sectional survey that queried education approaches, perspectives and barriers to PC education in general CVD fellowship training. The survey was distributed to 392 members of the American College of Cardiology Program Director (PD) listserv, representing 290 general CVD fellowships between 1/2023 and 4/2023. We performed descriptive and ꭕ2 analyses of survey data. RESULTS: Of the program's representatives, 56 completed the survey (response rate = 19.3%). Respondents identified themselves as current PDs (89%), associate PDs (8.9%) or former PDs (1.8%), representing a diverse range of program sizes and types and regions of the country. Respondents reported the use of informal bedside teaching (88%), formal didactics (59%), online or self-paced modules (13%), in-person simulation (11%), and clinical rotations (16%) to teach PC content. Most programs covered PC topics at least annually, although there was variability by topic. We found no associations between program demographics and type or frequency of PC education. Most respondents reported dissatisfaction with the quantity (62%) or quality (59%) of the PC education provided. Barriers to PC education included an overabundance of other content to cover (36%) and perceived lack of fellow (20%) or faculty (18%) interest. Comments demonstrated the importance of PC education in fellowship, the lack of a requirement to provide PC education, difficulty in covering all topics, and suggestions of how PC skills should be taught. CONCLUSIONS: In a national survey of CVD educational leadership concerning approaches to PC education in CVD training, respondents highlighted both challenges to implementation of formal PC curricula in cardiology training and opportunities for comprehensive PC education.

4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 70(12): 3378-3389, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35945706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about policies and practices for patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) who have a documented preference for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status at time of referral. We investigated how practices across TAVR programs align with goals of care for patients presenting with DNR status. METHODS: Between June and September 2019, we conducted semi-structured interviews with TAVR coordinators from 52/73 invited programs (71%) in Washington and California (TAVR volume > 100/year:34%; 50-99:36%; 1-50:30%); 2 programs reported no TAVR in 2018. TAVR coordinators described peri-procedural code status policies and practices and how they accommodate patients' goals of care. We used data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, stratified by programs' DNR practice, to examine differences in program size, patient characteristics and risk status, and outcomes. RESULTS: Nearly all TAVR programs (48/50: 96%) addressed peri-procedural code status, yet only 26% had established policies. Temporarily rescinding DNR status until after TAVR was the norm (78%), yet time frames for reinstatement varied (38% <48 h post-TAVR; 44% 48 h-to-discharge; 18% >30 days post-discharge). For patients with fluctuating code status, no routine practices for discharge documentation were well-described. No clinically substantial differences by code status practice were noted in Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality risk score, peri-procedural or in-hospital cardiac arrest, or hospice disposition. Six programs maintaining DNR status recognized TAVR as a palliative procedure. Among programs categorically reversing patients' DNR status, the rationale for differing lengths of time to reinstatement reflect divergent views on accountability and reporting requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Marked heterogeneity exists in management of peri-procedural code status across TAVR programs, including timeframe for reestablishing DNR status post-procedure. These findings call for standardization of DNR decisions at specific care points (before/during/after TAVR) to ensure consistent alignment with patients' health-related goals and values.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , United States , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aftercare , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , Patient Discharge , Risk Factors , Registries , Policy , Aortic Valve/surgery
8.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 63(2): e168-e175, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34363954

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in combination, yet little is known about the impact of these conditions together on end-of-life care. OBJECTIVES: Compare end-of-life care and advance care planning (ACP) documentation among patients with both HF and CKD to those with either condition. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of deceased patients (2010-2017) with HF and CKD (n = 1673), HF without CKD (n = 2671), and CKD without HF (n = 1706), excluding patients with cancer or dementia. We compared hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in the last 30 days of life, hospital deaths, and ACP documentation >30 days before death. RESULTS: 39% of patients with HF and CKD were hospitalized and 33% were admitted to the ICU in the last 30 days vs. 30% and 28%, respectively, for HF, and 26% and 23% for CKD. Compared to patients with both conditions, those with only 1 were less likely to be admitted to the hospital [HF: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.72, 95%CI 0.63-0.83; CKD: aOR 0.63, 95%CI 0.53-0.75] and ICU (HF: aOR 0.83, 95%CI 0.71-0.94; CKD: aOR 0.68, 95%CI 0.56-0.80) and less likely to have ACP documentation (aOR 0.53, 95%CI 0.47-0.61 and aOR 0.70, 95%CI 0.60-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Decedents with both HF and CKD had more ACP documentation and received more intensive end-of-life care than those with only 1 condition. These findings suggest that patients with co-existing HF and CKD may benefit from interventions to ensure care received aligns with their goals.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Heart Failure , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Adult , Death , Documentation , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 76(22): 2650-2670, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243384

ABSTRACT

The growing population of older adults (age ≥65 years) is expected to lead to higher rates of cardiovascular disease. The expansion of digital health (encompassing telehealth, telemedicine, mobile health, and remote patient monitoring), Internet access, and cellular technologies provides an opportunity to enhance patient care and improve health outcomes-opportunities that are particularly relevant during the current coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. Insufficient dexterity, visual impairment, and cognitive dysfunction, found commonly in older adults should be taken into consideration in the development and utilization of existing technologies. If not implemented strategically and appropriately, these can lead to inequities propagating digital divides among older adults, across disease severities and socioeconomic distributions. A systematic approach, therefore, is needed to study and implement digital health strategies in older adults. This review will focus on current knowledge of the benefits, barriers, and use of digital health in older adults for cardiovascular disease management.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Geriatrics , Telemedicine , Aged , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Internet Access/trends , Long-Term Care , Pandemics , Population Dynamics , Smartphone/trends , Subacute Care , Wearable Electronic Devices
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(8): e2010398, 2020 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833017

ABSTRACT

Importance: Whether the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preferences of patients receiving dialysis align with their values and other aspects of end-of-life care is not known. Objective: To describe the CPR preferences of patients receiving dialysis and how these preferences are associated with their responses to questions about other aspects of end-of-life care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional survey study of a consecutive sample of patients receiving dialysis at 31 nonprofit dialysis facilities in 2 US metropolitan areas (Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee) between April 22, 2015, and October 2, 2018. Analyses for this article were conducted between December 2018 and April 2020. Exposures: Participants were asked to respond to the question "If you had to decide right now, would you want CPR if your heart were to stop beating?" Those who indicated they would probably or definitely want CPR were categorized as preferring CPR. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study examined the association between preference for CPR and other treatment preferences, engagement in advance care planning, values, desired place of death, expectations about prognosis, symptoms, and palliative care needs. Results: Of the 1434 individuals invited to complete the survey, 1009 agreed to participate, and 876 were included in the analytic cohort (61.1%). The final cohort had a mean (SD) age of 62.6 (14.0) years; 492 (56.2%) were men, and 528 (60.3%) were White individuals. Among 738 of 876 participants (84.2%) who indicated that they would definitely or probably want CPR (CPR group), 555 (75.2%) wanted mechanical ventilation vs 13 of 138 (9.4%) of those who did not want CPR (do not resuscitate [DNR] group) (P < .001). A total of 249 of 738 participants (33.7%) in the CPR group vs 84 of 138 (60.9%) in the DNR group had documented treatment preferences (P < .001). In terms of values about future care, 171 participants (23.2%) in the CPR group vs 5 of 138 (3.6%) in the DNR group valued life prolongation (P < .001); 320 in the CPR group (43.4%) vs 109 of 138 in the DNR group (79.0%) valued comfort (P < .001); and 247 participants (33.5%) in the CPR group vs 24 of 138 (17.4%) in the DNR group were unsure about their wishes for future care (P < .001). In the CPR group, 207 (28.0%) had thought about stopping dialysis vs 62 of 138 (44.9%) in the DNR group (P < .001), and 181 (24.5%) vs 58 of 138 (42.0%) had discussed stopping dialysis (P = .001). No statistically significant associations were observed between CPR preference and documentation of a surrogate decision maker, thoughts or discussion of hospice, preferred place of death, expectations about prognosis, reported symptoms, or palliative care needs. Conclusions and Relevance: The CPR preferences of patients receiving dialysis were associated with some, but not all, other aspects of end-of-life care. How participants responded to questions about these other aspects of end-of-life care were not always aligned with their CPR preference. More work is needed to integrate discussions about code status with bigger picture conversations about patients' values, goals, and preferences for end-of-life care.


Subject(s)
Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis , Resuscitation Orders/psychology , Terminal Care/psychology , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennessee , Washington
12.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(1): 78-86, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31509233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Guideline-based management of cardiovascular disease often involves prescribing multiple medications, which contributes to polypharmacy and risk for adverse drug events in older adults. Deprescribing is a potential strategy to mitigate these risks. We sought to characterize and compare clinician perspectives regarding deprescribing cardiovascular medications across three specialties. DESIGN: National cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Ambulatory. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of geriatricians, general internists, and cardiologists from the American College of Physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Electronic survey assessing clinical practice of deprescribing cardiovascular medications, reasons and barriers to deprescribing, and choice of medications to deprescribe in hypothetical clinical cases. RESULTS: In each specialty, 750 physicians were surveyed, with a response rate of 26% for geriatricians, 26% for general internists, and 12% for cardiologists. Over 80% of respondents within each specialty reported that they had recently considered deprescribing a cardiovascular medication. Adverse drug reactions were the most common reason for deprescribing for all specialties. Geriatricians also commonly reported deprescribing in the setting of limited life expectancy. Barriers to deprescribing were shared across specialties and included concerns about interfering with other physicians' treatment plans and patient reluctance. In hypothetical cases, over 90% of physicians in each specialty chose to deprescribe when patients experienced adverse drug reactions. Geriatricians were most likely and cardiologists were least likely to consider deprescribing cardiovascular medications in cases of limited life expectancy (all P < .001), such as recurrent metastatic cancer (84% of geriatricians, 68% of general internists, and 45% of cardiologists), Alzheimer dementia (92% of geriatricians, 81% of general internists, and 59% of cardiologists), or significant functional impairment (83% of geriatricians, 68% of general internists, and 45% of cardiologists). CONCLUSIONS: While barriers to deprescribing cardiovascular medications are shared across specialties, reasons for deprescribing, especially in the setting of limited life expectancy, varied. Implementing deprescribing will require improved processes for both physician-physician and physician-patient communication. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:78-86, 2019.


Subject(s)
Cardiologists/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Deprescriptions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Geriatricians/statistics & numerical data , Life Expectancy , Aged , Cardiologists/psychology , Cardiovascular Diseases , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Frail Elderly , Geriatricians/psychology , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
14.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 71(9): 1195-201, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26957471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we sought to determine whether normal age or exercise training cause changes in the cardiac sympathetic nervous system function in male or female healthy volunteers. METHODS: Healthy sedentary participants underwent PET studies before and after 6 months of supervised exercise training. Presynaptic uptake by the norepinephrine transporter-1 function was measured using PET imaging of [(11)C]-meta-hydroxyephedrine, a norepinephrine analog, and expressed as a permeability-surface area product (PSnt in mL/min/mL). Postsynaptic function was measured as ß-adrenergic receptor density (ß'max in pmol/mL tissue) by imaging the ß-receptor antagonist [(11)C]-CGP12177. Myocardial blood flow (MBF in mL/min/mL tissue) was measured by imaging [(15)O]-water. RESULTS: At baseline, there was no age difference in ß'max or MBF but PSnt declined with age (1.12±0.11 young vs 0.87±0.06 old, p = .036). Before training, women had significantly greater MBF (0.87±0.03 vs 0.69±0.03, p < .0001) and PSnt (1.14±0.08 vs 0.75±0.07, p < .001) than men. Training increased VO2 max by 13% (p < .0001), but there were no training effects on ß'max, PSnt, or MBF. Greater MBF in females and a trend to increased PSnt post-training persisted. CONCLUSION: With age, presynaptic uptake as measured by PSnt declines, but there were no differences in ß'max. Endurance training significantly increased VO2 max but did not cause any changes in the measures of cardiac sympathetic nervous system function. These findings suggest that significant changes do not occur or that current PET imaging methods may be inadequate to measure small serial differences in a highly reproducible manner.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Heart/innervation , Positron-Emission Tomography , Sympathetic Nervous System/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Age Factors , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/etiology , Humans , Male , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Radiopharmaceuticals , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Synapses
15.
Circulation ; 133(16): 1560-73, 2016 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26957532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Representation by age ensures appropriate translation of clinical trial results to practice, but, historically, older patients have been underrepresented in clinical trial populations. As the general population has aged, it is unknown whether clinical trial enrollment has changed in parallel. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied time trends in enrollment, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes by age among 76 141 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome enrolled in 11 phase III clinical trials over 17 years (1994-2010). Overall, 19.7% of patients were ≥75 years; this proportion increased from 16% during 1994 to 1997 to 21% during 1998 to 2001 and 23.2% during 2002 to 2005, but declined to 20.2% in 2006 to 2010. The number of comorbidities increased with successive time periods irrespective of age. There were substantial increases in the use of evidence-based medication in-hospital and at discharge regardless of age. Although predicted 6-month mortality increased slightly over time, observed 6-month mortality declined significantly in all age strata (1994-1997 versus 2006-2010: <65 years: 3.0% versus 1.9%; 65-74 years: 7.5% versus 3.4%; 75-79 years: 13.0% versus 6.5%; 80-84 years: 17.6% versus 8.2%; and ≥85 years: 24.8% versus 12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of enrollment by age in phase III non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome trials was unchanged over time. Irrespective of age, post-myocardial infarction mortality decreased significantly over time, concurrent with increased evidence-based care and despite increasing comorbidities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00089895.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Patient Selection , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 36(4): 403-15, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23341180

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults and contributes directly to adverse clinical events, ranging from ischemic stroke to heart failure and cardiovascular death. Because the incidence of AF and its attendant complications increase with age, there is a strong and growing need to develop safe, effective and widely available therapies. The following review summarizes the use of oral anticoagulants in older adults with AF, focusing on practical topics such as drug metabolism, drug-drug interactions, co-morbidities and cost considerations in a complex payer environment.


Subject(s)
Aging , Anticoagulants/pharmacokinetics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/metabolism , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...