Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 814
Filter
1.
Clin Ter ; 175(2): 118-124, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571469

ABSTRACT

Background: In literature there is a lack of specific evaluation tools for behavior in intellectual disabilities in general and during an activity, this is one of the most important field of the Occupational Therapy intervention. Objective: Authors developed an Italian version of the Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS) and an Italian version of the Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale (COTES) and examined their reliability and validity. Methods: The original scales were translated from English to Italian using the "Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures-Principles of Good Practice" guidelines. Both scales were administered to adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities. People under eighteen years, with severe and profound intellectual disabilities and deaf people were excluded from the study. Their reliability and validity have been examined. Relia-bility was analyzed via internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and stability (intra/inter-rater coefficient), while validity was investigated via construct validity (p-value) and criterion validity using Pearson's correlation coefficients between them and with the Mini Mental State Examination and the Barthel Index Scale. Results: The OTTOS and the COTES were administered to 30 subjects. Cronbach's α for the COTES was 0,91 and Cronbach's α for the OTTOS was 0,92. Regarding the criterion of validity, the two scales have numerous statistically positive correlations, particularly with the Mini Mental State Examination in the Orientation and total part. Furthermore, the correlation with the Barthel scale is present in the total scores, the COTES's third subscale, and the OTTOS's first. Conclusions: The OTTOS and the COTES were reliable and valid outcome measures for assessing behavior in the Italian population.


Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Occupational Therapy , Adult , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Psychometrics , Italy , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Psicosom. psiquiatr ; (28): 30-44, Ene-Mar, 2024. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231742

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La enfermedad por COVID-19 ha afectado a millones de personas en todo el mundo y ha planteado un desafío sin precedentes a los sistemas de salud, provocando medidas como el distanciamiento social y el confinamiento domiciliario, que han afectado a la vida diaria y las relaciones sociales de la población. El objetivo principal de este artículo fue examinar las consecuencias de estas circunstancias en la salud mental infanto-juvenil. Método: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica disponible en PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase y ScinceDirect, de acuerdo con las recomendaciones de la Declaración PRISMA. La selección de los estudios se realizó en base a los siguientes criterios: estudios de investigación originales, con un diseño metodológico prospectivo, publicados a partir del año 2020 y que en sus resultados evaluaran mediante escalas niveles de depresión, estrés, ansiedad y/o problemas conductuales de la población infanto-juvenil durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: De los 334 estudios identificados, 14 cumplían los criterios establecidos para ser incluidos en esta revisión. Se agruparon los resultados en sintomatología internalizante y externalizante. En relación a la sintomatología internalizante, la diferencia de medias pre-post, analizada mediante la d de Cohen, fue de 0.172 (0.036; 0.308) siendo significativa (p = 0.0131). Por el contrario, no se objetivaron diferencias significativas en la sintomatología externalizante (p = 0.7314).Conclusiones: Durante la pandemia se observó un aumento de la sintomatología internalizante, pero no de la externalizante, en niños y adolescentes. Al mismo tiempo, se observaron variaciones que sugieren que el efecto podría estar modulado por factores individuales y contextuales.(AU)


Introduction: COVID-19 disease has affected millions of people worldwide and has posed an unprecedented challenge to health systems, leading to measures such as social distancing and home confinement that have affected the daily life and social relationships of the population. This article reviews the consequences of these circumstances on child and adolescent mental health. Methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature available in PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and ScinceDirect was carried out, in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA Declaration. The selection of studies followed the following criteria: original research studies with a prospective methodological design published from the year 2020 and whose results evaluated levels of depression, stress, anxiety and/or behavioral problems in the child and adolescent population during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using clinical scales. Results: Of the 334 studies identified, 14 met the criteria established to be included in this review. Results were grouped into internalizing and externalizing symptomatology. In relation to internalizing symptomatology the mean difference pre-post analyzed using Cohen’s d was 0.172 (0.036; 0.308), which was significant (p = 0.0131). No significant differences were observed in externalizing symptomatology (p = 0.7314). Conclusions: During the pandemic an increase in internalizing symptoms was observed, but not in externalizing symptoms, in children and adolescents. Also were observed variations suggesting that the effect could be modulated by individual and contextual factors.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , /psychology , Mental Health , Quarantine/psychology , /epidemiology , Adolescent Health , Child Health , Psychiatry
7.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 63(3): 350-357, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37774112

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a serious complication of pregnancy associated with maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. As current prediction models have limitations and may not be applicable in resource-limited settings, we aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) algorithm that offers a potential solution for developing accurate and efficient first-trimester prediction of PE. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in Mexico City, Mexico to develop a first-trimester prediction model for preterm PE (pPE) using ML. Maternal characteristics and locally derived multiples of the median (MoM) values for mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and serum placental growth factor were used for variable selection. The dataset was split into training, validation and test sets. An elastic-net method was employed for predictor selection, and model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and detection rates (DR) at 10% false-positive rates (FPR). RESULTS: The final analysis included 3050 pregnant women, of whom 124 (4.07%) developed PE. The ML model showed good performance, with AUCs of 0.897, 0.963 and 0.778 for pPE, early-onset PE (ePE) and any type of PE (all-PE), respectively. The DRs at 10% FPR were 76.5%, 88.2% and 50.1% for pPE, ePE and all-PE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our ML model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting pPE and ePE using first-trimester maternal characteristics and locally derived MoM. The model may provide an efficient and accessible tool for early prediction of PE, facilitating timely intervention and improved maternal and fetal outcome. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Eficiencia de un enfoque de aprendizaje automático para la predicción de la preeclampsia en un país de ingresos medios OBJETIVO: La preeclampsia (PE) es una complicación grave del embarazo asociada a morbilidad y mortalidad materna y del feto. Dado que los modelos de predicción actuales tienen limitaciones y pueden no ser aplicables en situaciones con recursos limitados, se propuso desarrollar un algoritmo de aprendizaje automático (AA) que ofrezca una solución con potencial para desarrollar una predicción precisa y eficiente de la PE en el primer trimestre. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte prospectivo en Ciudad de México para desarrollar un modelo de predicción de la PE pretérmino (PEp) en el primer trimestre utilizando AA. Para la selección de variables se utilizaron las características maternas y los múltiplos de la mediana (MdM) obtenidos localmente para la presión arterial media, el índice de pulsatilidad de la arteria uterina y el factor de crecimiento placentario sérico. El conjunto de datos se dividió en subconjuntos de datos de entrenamiento, de validación y de test estadístico. Se empleó un método de red elástica para la selección de predictores, y el rendimiento del modelo se evaluó mediante el área bajo la curva de características operativas del receptor (ABC) y las tasas de detección (TD) con tasas de falsos positivos (TFP) del 10%. RESULTADOS: El análisis final incluyó a 3050 mujeres embarazadas, de las cuales 124 (4,07%) desarrollaron PE. El modelo de AA mostró una buena eficiencia, con un ABC de 0,897, 0,963 y 0,778 para la PEp, la PE de aparición temprana (PEat) y cualquier tipo de PE (todas las PE), respectivamente. Las TD con TFP del 10% fueron del 76,5%, 88,2% y 50,1% para la PEp, PEat y todas las PE, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestro modelo de AA demostró una alta precisión en la predicción de la PEp y la PEat utilizando características maternas del primer trimestre y MdM calculados localmente. El modelo puede proporcionar una herramienta eficiente y accesible para la predicción temprana de la PE, facilitando la intervención oportuna y la mejora de los resultados maternos y del feto.


Subject(s)
Pre-Eclampsia , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Placenta Growth Factor , Prospective Studies , Biomarkers , Pregnancy Trimester, First
8.
Med Image Anal ; 90: 102913, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37660483

ABSTRACT

Neuroimaging markers based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) combined with various other measures (such as genetic covariates, biomarkers, vascular risk factors, neuropsychological tests etc.) might provide useful predictions of clinical outcomes during the progression towards Alzheimer's disease (AD). The use of multiple features in predictive frameworks for clinical outcomes has become increasingly prevalent in AD research. However, many studies do not focus on systematically and accurately evaluating combinations of multiple input features. Hence, the aim of the present work is to explore and assess optimal combinations of various features for MR-based prediction of (1) cognitive status and (2) biomarker positivity with a multi-kernel learning Gaussian process framework. The explored features and parameters included (A) combinations of brain tissues, modulation, smoothing, and image resolution; (B) incorporating demographics & clinical covariates; (C) the impact of the size of the training data set; (D) the influence of dimensionality reduction and the choice of kernel types. The approach was tested in a large German cohort including 959 subjects from the multicentric longitudinal study of cognitive impairment and dementia (DELCODE). Our evaluation suggests the best prediction of memory performance was obtained for a combination of neuroimaging markers, demographics, genetic information (ApoE4) and CSF biomarkers explaining 57% of outcome variance in out-of-sample predictions. The highest performance for Aß42/40 status classification was achieved for a combination of demographics, ApoE4, and a memory score while usage of structural MRI further improved the classification of individual patient's pTau status.

10.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 38(4): 291-302, May. 2023. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-219239

ABSTRACT

Introducción: En la actualidad, no existe una indicación formal de profilaxis anticomicial en neurocirugía oncológica. Tampoco existen recomendaciones específicas sobre el uso de fármacos antiepilépticos (FAE) en pacientes portadores de meningiomas y libres de crisis que van a ser intervenidos. En general, se prescriben FAE de forma discrecional, teniendo en cuenta diversos factores de riesgo clínico-radiológicos. Presentamos una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis sobre la efectividad de la profilaxis anticomicial en meningiomas sin historia previa de crisis. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, Embase y clinicaltrials.gov. De los 4.368 estudios inicialmente identificados, finalmente se incluyeron 12 para la extracción de datos y análisis cualitativo. Los datos clínicos permitieron incluir únicamente 6 estudios en el metaanálisis. Se realizaron estudios de heterogeneidad, cálculo de OR combinada, evaluación del sesgo de publicación y análisis de sensibilidad. Resultados: La profilaxis con FAE en meningiomas sin crisis previas no redujo de forma significativa la incidencia de crisis postoperatorias respecto a los controles (OR combinada de Mantle-Haenszel, efectos aleatorios, de 1,26, IC del 95%, 0,60-2,78, sobre 2.041 pacientes). Sin embargo, la ausencia de estudios prospectivos, la presencia de sesgo de selección en los estudios, una probable infraestimación del número de crisis durante el seguimiento y la influencia marcada de un estudio sobre el efecto global impiden establecer una recomendación sólida en contra de la profilaxis anticomicial. Conclusiones: Dentro de las limitaciones de esta revisión, los resultados del metaanálisis no apoyan el uso rutinario de la profilaxis antiepiléptica en pacientes con meningiomas sin historia previa de crisis.(AU)


Introduction: No formal indication currently exists for seizure prophylaxis in neurosurgical oncology patients. Neither have specific recommendations been made on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in seizure-free patients with meningiomas scheduled for surgery. AEDs are generally prescribed on a discretionary basis, taking into consideration a range of clinical and radiological risk factors. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Of a total of 4368 studies initially identified, 12 were selected for extraction of data and qualitative analysis. Based on the clinical data presented, we were only able to include 6 studies in the meta-analysis. We performed heterogeneity studies, calculated a combined odds ratio, evaluated publication bias, and conducted a sensitivity analysis. Results: AED prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures did not significantly reduce the incidence of post-operative seizures in comparison to controls (Mantel-Haenszel combined odds ratio, random effects model: 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.78]; 2041 patients). However, we are unable to establish a robust recommendation against this treatment due to the lack of prospective studies, the presence of selection bias in the studies reviewed, the likelihood of underestimation of seizure frequency during follow-up, and the strong influence of one study on the overall effect. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of this review, the results of the meta-analysis do not support the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Meningioma , Neurosurgery , Anticonvulsants , Epilepsy , Neurology , Nervous System Diseases
11.
Rev. int. med. cienc. act. fis. deporte ; 23(89): 61-75, mar. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-219871

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to analyse the correlation between perceived leadership behaviours of the Multidimensional Leadership Model (MML) and the cohesion categories of the Carron Cohesion Model in professional handball players. The sample was composed by 112 players who answered the Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS2) and the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) questionnaires. The results obtained (r = from 0.307 to 0.634) show an association between the cohesion variable (ATG-T) and the perceived behaviours of the (MML). A cohesion tendency towards the task by the players is observed. Autocratic behaviour exceeds democratic behaviour and training and instruction behaviours obtain the highest values. We conclude that cohesion towards the task is predominant in high performance players and that the high demand of the category demands different behaviours from the coach. (AU)


El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar la correlación entre las conductas del liderazgo percibido del Modelo Multidimensional de Liderazgo (MML) y las categorías de cohesión del Modelo de Cohesión de Carron en jugadores profesionales de balonmano. La muestra estuvo compuesta por un total de 112 jugadores a los cuales se les administró los cuestionarios Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS2) y el Group Environment Questionaaire (GEQ). Los resultados obtenidos (r = de 0.307 -0.634)muestran una asociación entre la variable de cohesión (ATG-T) y las conductas percibidas del (MML). Se observa una tendencia de cohesión hacia la tarea por parte de los jugadores. La conducta autocrática supera la democrática y la de entrenamiento e instrucción obtiene los valores más elevados. Concluimos que la cohesión hacia la tarea es la predominante en jugadores de alto rendimiento y que la alta exigencia de la categoría demanda de diferentes conductas del entrenador. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Behavior , Athletes , Sports , Leadership , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Spain
12.
Clin Ter ; 174(1): 8-13, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655638

ABSTRACT

Aims: The purpose of the present study was to translate and culturally adapt the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) for Italian individuals with spinal cord injury and spina bifida and to measure its psychometric properties. Methods: Consent from the authors of I-CAT was received, and then, following international guidelines, it was culturally adapted to Italian. The included participants adults who practice self-catheteri-zation. In order to evaluate criterion validity, the Qualiveen-30, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-self reported), and the Moorong self-efficacy scale (MSES) were administered together. Test-retest reliability was assessed administering the I-CAT a second time within a week. Following the COSMIN checklist, psychometric properties were evaluated. Results: All translated items resulted identical or similar to the original versions. Internal consistency, evaluated on 34 individuals, showed values of Cronbach's alpha of 0.889, test-retest reliability was evaluated through the intraclass correlation coefficient with values of 0.96. Statistically significant correlation between the I-ICAT and Qualiveen were found through Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's Correlation Coefficient for criterion validity. Conclusions: The Italian validation of I-CAT allows Italian professionals to investigate psychological barriers linked with self-catheterization in people with urinary tract dysfunction before learning about aseptic Intermittent Self Catheterization (IC) and improving patients' acceptance of it. This tool can also be used as follow-up after the training of intermittent self-catheterization techniques. Finally, it is an important tool for medical research.


Subject(s)
Translating , Translations , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Catheterization , Italy , Psychometrics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 36(2): 160-168, 2023 Apr.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36651282

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the hospital impact of influenza requires enriching epidemiological surveillance registries with other sources of information. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Hospital Care Activity Record - Minimum Basic Data Set (RAE-CMBD) in the analysis of the outcomes of patients hospitalised with this infection. METHODS: Observational and retrospective study of adults admitted with influenza in a tertiary hospital during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons. We calculated the concordance of the RAE-CMBD with the influenza epidemiological surveillance registry (gold standard), as well as the main parameters of internal and external validity. Logistic regression models were used for risk adjustment of in-hospital mortality and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 907 (97.74%) unique matches were achieved, with high inter-observer agreement (ƙ=0.828). The RAE-CMBD showed a 79.87% sensitivity, 99.72% specificity, 86.71% positive predictive value and 99.54% negative predictive value. The risk-adjusted mortality ratio of patients with influenza was lower than that of patients without influenza: 0.667 (0.53-0.82) vs. 1.008 (0.98-1.04) and the risk-adjusted length of stay ratio was higher: 1.15 (1.12-1.18) vs. 1.00 (0.996-1.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RAE-CMBD is a valid source of information for the study of the impact of influenza on hospital care. The lower risk-adjusted mortality of patients admitted with influenza compared to other inpatients seems to point to the effectiveness of the main clinical and organisational measures adopted.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Adult , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Seasons , Tertiary Care Centers
14.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 38(4): 291-302, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35781420

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: No formal indication currently exists for seizure prophylaxis in neurosurgical oncology patients. Neither have specific recommendations been made on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in seizure-free patients with meningiomas scheduled for surgery. AEDs are generally prescribed on a discretionary basis, taking into consideration a range of clinical and radiological risk factors. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Of a total of 4368 studies initially identified, 12 were selected for extraction of data and qualitative analysis. Based on the clinical data presented, we were only able to include 6 studies in the meta-analysis. We performed heterogeneity studies, calculated a combined odds ratio, evaluated publication bias, and conducted a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: AED prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures did not significantly reduce the incidence of post-operative seizures in comparison to controls (Mantel-Haenszel combined odds ratio, random effects model: 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.78]; 2041 patients). However, we are unable to establish a robust recommendation against this treatment due to the lack of prospective studies, the presence of selection bias in the studies reviewed, the likelihood of underestimation of seizure frequency during follow-up, and the strong influence of one study on the overall effect. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of this review, the results of the meta-analysis do not support the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Meningioma/complications , Meningioma/surgery , Meningioma/chemically induced , Phenytoin/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Incidence , Meningeal Neoplasms/complications , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery
15.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 75(11): 906-913, nov. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-211712

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos La disección coronaria espontánea (DCE) es una causa poco común de infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM). En este estudio se comparan la mortalidad y los reingresos hospitalarios de los pacientes con IAM-DCE e IAM de otras etiologías (IAM-NDCE). Métodos Se calcularon las razones de mortalidad hospitalaria y de reingresos a los 30 días estandarizadas por riesgo (RAMER y RARER respectivamente) utilizando el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos del Sistema Nacional de Salud español (2016-2019). Resultados Se hallaron 806 eventos de IAM-DCE y 119.425 de IMA-NDCE. Los IAM-DCE se produjeron en pacientes más jóvenes y más frecuentemente mujeres que los IAM-NDCE. La mortalidad bruta fue menor (el 3 frente al 7,6%; p<0,001) y la RAMER, mayor (el 7,6±1,7 frente al 7,4±1,7%; p=0,019) en los IAM-DCE. Tras emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión (806 parejas), la mortalidad fue similar en ambos grupos (AdjOR=1,15; IC95%, 0,61-2,2; p=0,653). La tasa bruta de reingresos de los pacientes con IAM-DCE a 30 días fue similar (el 4,6 frente al 5%; p=0,67), mientras que la RARER fue menor (el 4,7±1 frente al 4,8±1%; p=0,015). Tras el emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión (715 parejas), la tasa de ingresos fue similar en ambos grupos (AdjOR=1,14; IC95%, 0,67-1,98; p=0,603). Conclusiones La mortalidad hospitalaria y los reingresos a los 30 días de los pacientes con IAM-DCE es similar a la de los IAM-NDCE cuando el riesgo se ajusta a las características basales de la población. Estos datos resaltan la necesidad de optimizar el manejo, tratamiento y seguimiento clínico de los pacientes con DCE (AU)


Introduction and objectives Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to compare the results on in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates among patients with AMI-SCAD vs AMI due to other causes (AMI-non-SCAD). Methods Risk-standardized in-hospital mortality (rIMR) and risk-standardized 30-day readmission ratios (rRAR) were calculated using the minimum dataset of the Spanish National Health System (2016-2019). Results A total of 806 episodes of AMI-SCAD were compared with 119 425 episodes of AMI–non-SCAD. Patients with AMI-SCAD were younger and more frequently female than those with AMI–non-SCAD. Crude in-hospital mortality was lower (3% vs 7.6%; P<.001) and rIMR higher (7.6±1.7% vs 7.4±1.7%; P=.019) in AMI-SCAD. However, after propensity score adjustment (806 pairs), the mortality rate was similar in the 2 groups (AdjOR, 1.15; 95%CI, 0.61-2,2; P=.653). Crude 30-day readmission rates were also similar in the 2 groups (4.6% vs 5%, P=.67) whereas rRAR were lower (4.7±1% vs 4.8%±1%; P=.015) in patients with AMI-SCAD. Again, after propensity score adjustment (715 pairs) readmission rates were similar in the 2 groups (AdjOR, 1.14; 95%CI, 0.67–1.98; P=.603). Conclusions In-hospital mortality and readmission rates are similar in patients with AMI-SCAD and AMI–non-SCAD when adjusted for the differences in baseline characteristics. These findings underscore the need to optimize the management, treatment, and clinical follow-up of patients with SCAD (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Disease/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Retrospective Studies , Medical Records , Spain/epidemiology
16.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 6053, 2022 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229438

ABSTRACT

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 became the globally dominant variant in early 2022. A sub-lineage of the Omicron variant (BA.2) was identified in England in January 2022. Here, we investigated hospitalisation and mortality risks of COVID-19 cases with the Omicron sub-lineage BA.2 (n = 258,875) compared to BA.1 (n = 984,337) in a large cohort study in England. We estimated the risk of hospital attendance, hospital admission or death using multivariable stratified proportional hazards regression models. After adjustment for confounders, BA.2 cases had lower or similar risks of death (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90), hospital admission (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94) and any hospital attendance (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01). These findings that the risk of severe outcomes following infection with BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 was slightly lower or equivalent to the BA.1 sub-lineage can inform public health strategies in countries where BA.2 is spreading.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
17.
Arch Dis Child ; 2022 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35858775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand community seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents. This is vital to understanding the susceptibility of this cohort to COVID-19 and to inform public health policy for disease control such as immunisation. DESIGN: We conducted a community-based cross-sectional seroprevalence study in participants aged 0-18 years old recruiting from seven regions in England between October 2019 and June 2021 and collecting extensive demographic and symptom data. Serum samples were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins using Roche assays processed at UK Health Security Agency laboratories. Prevalence estimates were calculated for six time periods and were standardised by age group, ethnicity and National Health Service region. RESULTS: Post-first wave (June-August 2020), the (anti-spike IgG) adjusted seroprevalence was 5.2%, varying from 0.9% (participants 10-14 years old) to 9.5% (participants 5-9 years old). By April-June 2021, this had increased to 19.9%, varying from 13.9% (participants 0-4 years old) to 32.7% (participants 15-18 years old). Minority ethnic groups had higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity than white participants (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), after adjusting for sex, age, region, time period, deprivation and urban/rural geography. In children <10 years, there were no symptoms or symptom clusters that reliably predicted seropositivity. Overall, 48% of seropositive participants with complete questionnaire data recalled no symptoms between February 2020 and their study visit. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of participants aged 15-18 years old had evidence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 prior to the introduction of widespread vaccination. These data demonstrate that ethnic background is independently associated with risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04061382.

18.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 75(7): 585-594, jul. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-205128

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos: Los resultados combinados se utilizan ampliamente, pero tienen diversas limitaciones. El modelo Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and related costs (COHERENT) es una aproximación nueva para presentar y comparar visualmente todos los componentes de los resultados combinados (incidencia, tiempo, duración) y los costes relacionados. El objetivo es evaluar su utilidad en una cohorte de pacientes. Métodos: Se diseñó un sistema de colores que representa gráficamente el porcentaje de pacientes en cada situación clínica (estado vital y ubicación: domicilio, urgencias, hospital), codificada jerárquicamente, en cada momento del seguimiento. Se aplicó a 1.126 pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda de 25 hospitales seguidos durante 30 días tras su visita a urgencias, y se calculó el tiempo en cada situación clínica y sus costes sanitarios. Resultados: El modelo ilustra visualmente los componentes del objetivo combinado a los 30 días (el 2,12% en urgencias, el 23,6% en hospitalización índice, el 2,7% en reingresos, el 65,5% vivo en casa y el 6,02% fallecido) y muestra diferencias significativas entre grupos de pacientes, hospitales o sistemas sanitarios. El instrumento también calcula y muestra los costes diarios y acumulados (total, 4.895.070 euros; media, 144,91 euros/paciente/día). Conclusiones: El modelo COHERENT es un nuevo método para mostrar visualmente resultados combinados y sus costes que permite comparar grupos de pacientes y cohortes. El nuevo sistema puede ser útil como un nuevo criterio de valoración para ensayos clínicos o estudios observacionales, y un instrumento para la evaluación comparativa, la planificación clínica, el análisis económico y la implementación de la atención sanitaria basada en valor (AU)


Introduction and objectives: Composite endpoints are widely used but have several limitations. The Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and related costs (COHERENT) model is a new approach for visually displaying and comparing composite endpoints including all their components (incidence, timing, duration) and related costs. We aimed to assess the validity of the COHERENT model in a patient cohort. Methods: A color graphic system displaying the percentage of patients in each clinical situation (vital status and location: at home, emergency department [ED] or hospital) and related costs at each time point during follow-up was created based on a list of mutually exclusive clinical situations coded in a hierarchical fashion. The system was tested in a cohort of 1126 patients with acute heart failure from 25 hospitals. The system calculated and displayed the time spent in each clinical situation and health care resource utilization-related costs over 30 days. Results: The model illustrated the times spent over 30 days (2.12% in ED, 23.6% in index hospitalization, 2.7% in readmissions, 65.5% alive at home, and 6.02% dead), showing significant differences between patient groups, hospitals, and health care systems. The tool calculated and displayed the daily and cumulative health care-related costs over time (total, €4 895 070; mean, €144.91 per patient/d). Conclusions: The COHERENT model is a new, easy-to-interpret, visual display of composite endpoints, enabling comparisons between patient groups and cohorts, including related costs. The model may constitute a useful new approach for clinical trials or observational studies, and a tool for benchmarking, and value-based health care implementation (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Emergency Service, Hospital , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospitalization , Health Care Costs , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies
19.
Rev. Fac. Med. Hum ; 22(3): 533-539, julio-Septiembre 2022.
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1381859

ABSTRACT

Introducción En los últimos años, el número de casos de malaria en las comunidades nativas de Condorcanqui, Amazonas ha aumentado considerablemente. La malaria por Plasmodium vivax es endémica en la región y en 2019 fue reportada la reintroducción de P. falciparum. Métodos En este estudio, recopilamos y analizamos los datos de malaria y COVID-19 reportados por la Dirección Regional de Salud (DIRESA) durante el 2020. Además, realizamos un análisis de razón de posibilidades "odds ratio" para evaluar las asociaciones significativas entre los síntomas de la COVID-19 y las infecciones previas de malaria. Resultados En el 2020, se reportaron 1547 casos de malaria (97% por P. vivax) y 5968 de COVID-19. Por otro lado, 96 pacientes contrajeron COVID-19 después de contraer una infección de malaria. De éstos, 87 eran sintomáticos (90,6%) y en su mayoría adultos de 30 a 59 años (62,3%). Además, encontramos que las infecciones previas de malaria están asociadas a la presencia de síntomas como fiebre, tos, dolor de garganta y dificultad respiratoria. Sin embargo, no hubo asociación significativa entre estos casos y la hospitalización o la muerte. Conclusión Nuestro análisis sugiere que las infecciones previas por malaria podrían afectar la sintomatología de la COVID-19, lo que destaca la importancia de un programa continuo de control y vigilancia de la malaria para evitar posibles sindemias con la COVID-19.


Introduction In recent years, the number of malaria cases in native communities from Condorcanqui, Amazonas has considerably increased. Plasmodium vivax malaria is endemic in the region and the re-introduction of P. falciparum was reported in 2019. Methods Here, we compiled and analyzed malaria and COVID-19 data reported by the Regional Direction of Health (DIRESA) during the 2020. Additionally, we performed an odds ratio analysis to evaluate significant associations between COVID-19 symptoms and previous malaria infections. Results In 2020, 1547 malaria (97% were P. vivax) and 5968 COVID-19 cases were reported. Furthermore, 96 patients got COVID-19 after getting a malaria infection. From these, 87 were symptomatic (90.6%), and mostly adults, ages 30 to 59 (62.3%). Also, we found that malaria previous infections represent a risk for the presence of symptoms such as fever, cough, throat pain, and respiratory difficulty. Nevertheless, there was no significant association between these cases and hospitalization or death. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that previous malaria infections might affect COVID-19 symptomatology, which highlights the importance of a continuing control and surveillance malaria program to avoid potential syndemics with COVID-19.

20.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 37(6): 366-373, 2022.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35659444

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is no agreement on the existence of the weekend effect in healthcare or, if it exists, on its possible causes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the differences in healthcare outcomes between patients admitted on weekdays or weekends in a high-complexity hospital. METHODS: Observational and retrospective study of patients admitted between 2016 and 2019 in a public hospital with more than 1300 beds. Hospitalization episodes were classified according to whether admission took place between Friday at 3:00 p.m. and the following Monday at 8:00 a.m. (weekend admission) or not (admission on weekdays). Mortality, length of stay and associated costs were compared, applying their respective risk-adjustment models. RESULTS: Of the total 169,495 hospitalization episodes analyzed, 48,201 (28.44%) corresponded to the weekend, presenting an older age (54.9 years vs. 53.9; P<.001), a higher crude mortality rate (5.22% vs. 4.59%; P<0.001), and a longer average length of stay (7.42 days vs. 6.74; P<.001), than those admitted on weekdays. The median crude cost of stay was lower (€731.25 vs. €850.88; P<0.001). No significant differences were found when applying the adjustment models, with a risk-adjusted mortality ratio of 1.03 (0.99-1.08) vs. 0.98 (0.95-1.01), risk-adjusted length of stay of 1.002 (0.98-1.005) vs. 0.999 (0.997-1.002) and risk-adjusted cost of stay of 0.928 (0.865-0.994) vs. 0.901 (0.843-0.962). CONCLUSION: The results of the study reveal that the assistance provided during the weekends does not imply worse health outcomes or increased costs. Comparing the impact between hospitals will require a future homogenization of temporal criteria and risk adjustment models.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Patient Admission , Humans , Hospital Mortality , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...