A Randomized Clinical Trial: Patient Satisfaction of Paper Versus Electronic Provider Feedback.

IMPORTANCE: Minimal data compare patient satisfaction with completing paper versus electronic evaluations. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare patient satisfaction with completing paper versus electronic evaluations. Secondary objectives were assessing age, education, and socioeconomic status with comfort with technology; preference for evaluation type; and timeliness of completing evaluations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center randomized trial comparing paper versus electronic patient evaluations of health care providers. Study participation occurred at the end of clinic visits. RESULTS: Among 145 participants, 73 (50.3%) were analyzed as paper versus 72 (49.7%) as electronic. Groups were similar in age, race, education level, income, insurance type, technology comfort, and technology use. Groups were similar in finding ease (P = 0.99) and satisfaction (P = 0.76) with their randomized method. For participants randomized to paper, 34% preferred paper, 25% preferred electronic, and 41% had no preference. Electronic feedback took longer to complete (4.5 minutes vs 3.4 minutes, P < 0.001). Older participants took longer to complete the evaluation (4.5 minutes vs 3.2 minutes, P < 0.001), had less internet use (P = 0.01), and were less likely to own a computer (P = 0.03) than younger participants. There were differences by education level for comfort with technology (P = 0.007) and internet use (P = 0.016). There were no differences in ease of feedback completion or satisfaction when comparing age, education status, or income status. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were satisfied with paper and electronic health care provider evaluations, regardless of age or other demographics. Evaluations were completed quickly during visits. Requesting feedback from patients via multiple modalities is feasible in a varied patient population.

A Rare Case of Hydralazine-Induced Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage.

Hydralazine-induced anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis may occur any time after hydralazine initiation. General internists should recognize diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) as a rare complication of this condition, as early treatment reduces the associated high risk of mortality. We describe the case of an 82-year-old female with diastolic heart failure who presented with a one-month history of worsening dyspnea on exertion and a one-week history of scant hemoptysis and fatigue. Her medications included aspirin and hydralazine. She was hypoxic with bilateral expiratory wheezes on exam. Labs showed new anemia, elevated creatinine, proteinuria, and hematuria. Chest computed tomography showed asymmetric bilateral upper lobe ground-glass attenuation superimposed on interlobular septal thickening and intralobular lines. Further testing showed anti-nuclear antibody, positive ANCA, perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA), and anti-myeloperoxidase ANCA (anti-MPO-ANCA). Renal biopsy revealed MPO-ANCA, pauci-immune, necrotizing, and crescentic glomerulonephritis. She was diagnosed with DAH secondary to hydralazine-induced ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Hydralazine is an anti-hypertensive medication with known potential for autoimmune reactions. Of these, AAV is a rare sequela mediated by anti-MPO and most commonly affects the kidneys. In rare circumstances, patients with AAV can develop pulmonary-renal syndrome, resulting in both glomerulonephritis and DAH with an associated high risk of mortality. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion in patients with acute kidney injury of unclear etiology. Early diagnosis through immune work-up and kidney biopsy should be pursued, as prompt recognition of the vasculitis, cessation of hydralazine, immunosuppression, and early plasma exchange are essential to an improved prognosis.

Emotional Exhaustion, a Proxy for Burnout, Is Associated with Sleep Health in French Healthcare Workers without Anxiety or Depressive Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Burnout is frequent among healthcare workers, and sleep problems are suspected risk factors. The sleep health framework provides a new approach to the promotion of sleep as a health benefit. The aim of this study was to assess good sleep health in a large sample of healthcare workers and to investigate its relationship with the absence of burnout among healthcare workers while considering anxiety and depressive symptoms. A cross-sectional Internet-based survey of French healthcare workers was conducted in summer 2020, at the end of the first COVID-19 lockdown in France (March to May 2020). Sleep health was assessed using the RU-SATED v2.0 scale (RegUlarity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, Duration). Emotional exhaustion was used as a proxy for overall burnout. Of 1069 participating French healthcare workers, 474 (44.3%) reported good sleep health (RU-SATED > 8) and 143 (13.4%) reported emotional exhaustion. Males and nurses had a lower likelihood of emotional exhaustion than females and physicians, respectively. Good sleep health was associated with a 2.5-fold lower likelihood of emotional exhaustion and associations persisted among healthcare workers without significant anxiety and depressive symptoms. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore the preventive role of sleep health promotion in terms of the reduction in burnout risk.