Usefulness of skin testing in cutaneous drug eruptions in routine practice.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous drug eruptions are common side-effects. The imputation score combining intrinsic (chronology, clinical and paraclinical signs) and extrinsic criteria used in Pharmacovigilance Centres is insufficient alone to identify with certainty a responsible drug. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the imputation score before and after performing skin testing in patients with cutaneous drug eruptions. PATIENTS/METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study was performed on 339 patients tested between 2001-2006. Imputation scores were calculated before and after skin tests for each cutaneous drug eruption according to the clinical type of skin eruption and the type of drug. RESULTS: Among 121 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 46% showed an increase of the imputation score as shown by 25/41 cases of maculo-papular exanthema, 4/11 cases of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and 17/41 cases of urticaria/anaphylaxis. The imputation score increased in 25/70 cases of the tested antibiotic drugs, in 14/56 cases of cardiovascular drugs, and it increased in 19 patients (34%) with I1 or I2 imputation scores before skin testing and in 29 (52%) with an I3 imputation score before skin testing. CONCLUSIONS: Drug skin testing appeared useful in investigating cutaneous drug eruptions in routine practice, including not only drugs with a high imputation score (I3) but also those with a lower score (I1, I2). Drug skin testing should lead to oral rechallenge of drugs with negative tests in order to determine which drugs may be used safely.

Variations in management of stage I to stage III cutaneous melanoma: a population-based study of clinical practices in France.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current management of cutaneous melanoma (CM) and identify factors accounting for disparities. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study using survey of cancer registries and pathology laboratories, and questionnaires to physicians. SETTING: Five regions covering 19.2% of the French territory and including 8.2 million inhabitants. PATIENTS: Incident cases of patients with stage I to stage II (hereinafter, stage I-II) tumors staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging guidelines and nodal stage III CM in 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Modalities of diagnosis and excision, surgical margins, sentinel lymph node biopsy, adjuvant therapies and surveillance procedures, and their variations according to age, sex, residence, location of primary CM, Breslow thickness, type of physicians, modalities of decisions, and health care patterns. RESULTS: Clinical stage I-II CMs (n = 710 cases) slightly predominated in females (53%), with a lower mean Breslow thickness (1.4 mm) than in males (1.9 mm). Initial excisions were most often performed by private dermatologists and wide excisions by surgeons. Narrow margins (8%) were associated with advanced age, higher Breslow thickness, and head location. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 34% of CMs thicker than 1.0 mm, depending on geographical regions, distance from reference centers, and health care patterns. Adjuvant therapies (mainly low-dose interferon) were proposed in 53% of thick CMs (>1.5 mm), depending on the patient's age and geographical region. In contrast with French recommendations, surveillance procedures frequently included systematic medical imaging. Stage III nodal CMs (n = 89 cases) predominated in males (62%). After lymphadenectomy, adjuvant therapies (including high-dose interferon in 32% of cases and chemotherapies in 24% of cases) were proposed in 68% of cases, depending on the patient's age and geographical region. A complete 1-year high-dose interferon regimen was administered in less than 10% of cases. CONCLUSION: Large disparities still exist in the management of CM in France, depending to a greater extent on medical and geographical environment than on the characteristics of either patients or tumors.