Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 179(1): 221-5, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9704791

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate whether multifetal pregnancies reduced to twins have an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction and discordant birth weight. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study investigated the rates of birth weight discordance > 20% and intrauterine growth restriction using both twin and singleton birth weight curves in 441 twin deliveries after multifetal pregnancy reduction (233 reduced from triplets, 156 from quadruplets, and 52 from quintuplets or greater) compared with 136 nonreduced dichorionic twins. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the frequency of birth weight discordance and in the overall incidence of intrauterine growth restriction by both twin and singleton birth weight curves when pregnancies that underwent multifetal pregnancy reduction were compared with the control group. There was, however, an almost twofold increase in the rate of intrauterine growth restriction in pregnancies with a starting fetal number of 5 or more (23.1%) compared with that in those reduced from triplets or quadruplets (12.1%) when the twin curve standard was used (P = .03). This difference disappeared when these groups were compared with a singleton nomogram. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction unless the starting fetal number is > or = 5. This finding provides a further rationale to avoid transferring excessive numbers of preembryos after in vitro fertilization.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight/physiology , Fetal Growth Retardation/etiology , Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal/adverse effects , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics as Topic , Twins
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 89(3): 368-72, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9052587

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques are at increased risk for obstetric complications or perinatal morbidity. METHODS: A computerized perinatal data base was reviewed for all twin pregnancies managed by private obstetricians and delivered between 1990 and 1995. The obstetric and neonatal outcomes of those conceived following in vitro fertilization (IVF) or gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) were compared to the outcomes of those conceived spontaneously. RESULTS: There were 105 twin deliveries following IVF or GIFT and 279 following natural fertilization. Discordant birth weight and low birth weight occurred more frequently in pregnancies conceived by IVF or GIFT (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 3.91; OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.98, 2.79, respectively). Elective cesarean delivery was more frequent in twin pregnancies conceived after IVF GIFT (relative risk [RR] 4.02, 95% CI 1.28, 12.6). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of antepartum or intrapartum complications, preterm delivery, or mean gestational age at delivery. There was no statistically significant increase in the frequency of neonatal complications among infants born after IVF GIFT. CONCLUSION: Although twin pregnancies following IVF or GIFT are more likely to result in discordant birth weight infants, the perinatal outcome is comparable to that of spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer , Pregnancy Outcome , Twins , Adult , Birth Weight , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 88(4 Pt 2): 739-44, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8841285

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available literature on the effects of continuous labor support among primiparous women. DATA SOURCES: We did a Medline search using the keywords "labor support," "doula," and "monitrice." Papers published in English from 1965 to May 1995 were eligible for this review. We also cross-checked all the references in the selected reports. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We identified seven randomized clinical trials published during that period; four of these were eligible for our meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Meta-analysis of four studies conducted among young, low-income, primiparous women who gave birth on a busy labor floor in the absence of a companion suggested that continuous labor support by a labor attendant shortens the duration of labor by 2.8 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.4), doubles spontaneous vaginal birth (relative risk [RR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.5-2.7) and halves the frequency of oxytocin use (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.4-0.7), forceps use (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.3-0.7), and cesarean delivery rate (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.4-0.7). Women with labor support also reported higher satisfaction and a better postpartum course. CONCLUSION: Labor support may have important positive effects on obstetric outcomes among young, disadvantaged women. Further studies on benefit relative to cost are needed before a broad-scale program is advocated.


Subject(s)
Labor, Obstetric , Social Support , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Parity , Patient Satisfaction , Poverty , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...