Laparoscopic diaphragm rupture repair.

Diaphragm rupture is an infrequently encountered but well-documented injury in the multiply injured patient. Only a few cases in which minimally invasive techniques were used for repair have been reported thus far. Herein we describe the repair of a diaphragm rupture in a 36-year-old man who was injured in a motor vehicle accident. In a 10-year review of the literature, we were able to locate seven journal articles reporting 10 patients. We conclude that in appropriate stable patients with diaphragm rupture, minimally invasive techniques offer a reasonable alternative to open laparotomy or thoracotomy.

The high morbidity of blunt cerebrovascular injury in an unscreened population: more evidence of the need for mandatory screening protocols.

BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare injuries causing substantial morbidity and mortality. The appropriate screening methods and treatment options for these injuries are controversial. We examined our experience with these injuries at a community Level I Trauma center over a 51 month period. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review and analysis was done of all patients with the diagnosis of a blunt cerebrovascular injury during this period. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had blunt carotid injury (0.40%) and three had blunt vertebral injury (0.09%) out of 3,480 total blunt admissions. The overall incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury was 0.49%. The most common associated injuries were to the head (59%) and chest (47%) regions. The overall mortality rate was 59% (10 of 17), with death occurring in 8 of 14 (57%) blunt carotid injury patients and 2 of 3 (67%) blunt vertebral injury patients. Eight of ten (80%) deaths were directly attributable to the blunt cerebrovascular injury. Median time until diagnosis was 12.5 h (range 1-336 h) for the entire group and 19.5 h for nonsurvivors. Diagnosis was delayed > 24h in 7 patients and > 48h in 5 patients. All five patients whose diagnoses were delayed > 48 h developed complications, and four (80%) of these patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Blunt cerebrovascular injury is uncommon, but lethal; particularly when the diagnosis is delayed. Aggressive screening protocols based on mechanism of injury, associated injuries, and physical findings are justified to minimize morbidity and mortality. Head and chest injuries may serve as markers for blunt cerebrovascular injury. Most deaths are directly attributable to the blunt cerebrovascular injury and not to associated injuries.

A potentially expanded role for enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in high risk blunt trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication after trauma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of enoxaparin in preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after injury in patients who are at high risk for developing VTE. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-cohort observational study was initiated for seriously injured blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during a 7-month period. Patients were eligible for the study if time hospitalized was > or = 72 hours, Injury Severity Score (ISS) was > or = 9, enoxaparin was started within 24 hours after admission, and one or more of the following high risk criteria were met: age > 50 years, ISS > or = 16, presence of a femoral vein catheter, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) > or = 3 for any body region, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score < or = 8, presence of major pelvic, femur, or tibia fracture, and presence of direct blunt mechanism venous injury. Patients with closed head injuries and nonoperatively treated solid abdominal organ injuries were also potential participants. The primary outcomes measured were thromboembolic events--either a documented lower extremity DVT by duplex color-flow doppler ultrasonography or a PE documented by rapid infusion CT pulmonary angiography or conventional pulmonary angiography. RESULTS: There were 118 patients enrolled in the study. Two patients (2%) developed DVT, one of which was proximal to the calf (95% confidence interval, 0% to 6%). Two of 12 patients (17%) with splenic injuries who received enoxaparin failed initial nonoperative management. There were no other bleeding complications, and no clinical evidence or documented episodes of PE. One patient died from multiple system organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin is a practical and effective method for reducing the incidence of VTE in high risk, seriously injured patients. This study supports further investigation into the safety of enoxaparin prophylaxis in patients with closed head injuries and nonoperatively treated solid abdominal organ injuries.

Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of routine helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the entire cervical spine in high-risk patients with multiple injuries. METHODS: Prospective study of patients with severe blunt multiple injuries, requiring intensive care unit admission and CT scan of another body area besides the cervical spine. All patients were evaluated by means of standard cervical spine radiography. A complete cervical spine CT scan was performed during the same trip to the scanner in which other body areas were evaluated. The plain films and the CT scans were read by a radiologist in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8.9 and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.1. Twenty patients (34.4%) had cervical spine injuries (12 stable and 8 unstable injuries). Plain radiography missed eight injuries (including three unstable) and its sensitivity was 60%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 85.1%. The helical CT scan missed two spinal injuries (both stable) and its sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 95%. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of cervical spine injuries in the severe, blunt, multiple-injury, unevaluable patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Plain radiography alone is not reliable in diagnosing many cervical spine injuries. Complete cervical spiral computed tomography is superior to plain radiography. It is suggested that in this selected group of patients, both plain radiography and spiral computed tomography should be performed.

Traumatic injury to the superior mesenteric artery.

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) injuries are rare and devastating injuries incurring very high mortality rates. It is the purpose of this study to review our experience with these injuries, to analyze Fullen's classification based on anatomical zone and injury grade for its predictive value, and to correlate the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) for abdominal vascular injury with mortality. METHODS: Retrospective study was made over a 65-month period of all patients sustaining SMA injuries in an urban level I trauma center. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients, mean age 31, had a mean Revised Trauma Score of 5.86 and a mean Injurity Severity Score of 23. Mechanisms of injury were penetrating 27 (77%) and blunt 8 (23%). Mean admission systolic blood pressure was 85 mm Hg. Mean estimated blood loss was 8,500 mL and mean total fluid replacement 17,000 mL. Operating room findings were retroperitoneal hematoma in 34 (97%) and "black bowel" in 2 (6%). Number of associated injuries was nonvascular, mean 4.2, and vascular, mean 1.5. Surgical management consisted of ligation in 18 (51%), primary repair in 14 (40%), and interposition graft in 2 (6%). Overall mortality was 19 of 35 (54%). Mortality versus Fullen's zones was zone I, 100%, zone II, 43%, and zones III and IV, 25%. Mortality versus Fullen's ischemia grade was grade 1, 89%, grade 2, 58%, grade 3, 100%, and grade 4, 19%. Mortality versus AAST-OIS: was grade 1, 0%, grade II, 20%, grade III, 0%, grade IV, 59%, and grade V, 88%. CONCLUSIONS: SMA injuries are highly lethal. Most deaths are due to exsanguination. A higher number of associated vascular injuries increases mortality. "Black bowel" is an uncommon finding. Both Fullen's anatomical zones and the AAST-OIS for abdominal vascular injuries correlate with mortality. Fullen's ischemia grade does not.

Double intussusception in an adult following a laparotomy for trauma: a case report and review of the literature.

Intussusception is an unusual occurrence in adults. Postoperative intussusception may represent a separate pathophysiologic entity from primary intussusception in adults, occurring more frequently in the small bowel and without a specific underlying cause. Surgical resection is not mandatory and in those patients with viable bowel in whom the intussusception can successfully be reduced, manual reduction alone is an appropriate surgical strategy. Intussusception after laparotomy for trauma is a recently recognized phenomenon. For as yet unexplained reasons there seems to be a high association with liver injuries. A case of double intussusception is presented after a penetrating injury to the liver with discussion of the possible etiology and pathophysiology of this entity.

One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the parameters measured in the field, during transport, and upon arrival of the physiologic condition of patients sustaining penetrating cardiac injuries, along with the Cardiovascular Respiratory Score (CVRS) component of the Trauma Score, the mechanism and anatomical site of injury, operative characteristics, and cardiac rhythm as predictors of outcome. We also set out to identify a set of patient characteristics that best predict mortality outcome and to correlate cardiac injury grade as determined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) with mortality. METHODS: This report was a prospective study at American College of Surgeons Level I urban trauma center. Interventions included thoracotomy, sternotomy, or both, for resuscitation and definitive repair of cardiac injury. The main outcome measures used were those parameters measuring physiologic condition of patients, CVRS, mechanism and anatomical site of injury, mortality, and grade of injury. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients sustained penetrating cardiac injuries: 68 injuries (65%) were gunshot wounds and 37 injuries (35%) were stab wounds. The mean Injury Severity Score was 36. Of the 105 wounds, 23 wounds (22%) involved multiple-chamber injuries. The overall survival was 35 of 105 patients (33%): survival of gunshot wound victims was 11 of 68 patients (16%); survival of stab wound victims was 24 of 37 patients (65%). Emergency department thoracotomy was performed in 71 of the 105 patients (68%) with 10 survivors (14%). CVRS: 94% mortality (50 of 53) when CVRS = 0, 89% mortality (57 of 64) when CVRS = 0 to 3, and 31% mortality (12 of 39) when CVRS 4 to 11 (p < 0.001). The presence of sinus rhythm when pericardium was opened predicted survival (p < 0.001). Anatomical site of injury (injured chamber) and the presence of tamponade did not predict survival. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified gunshot wound, exsanguination, and restoration of blood pressure as most predictive variables of mortality. AAST-OIS injury grade and mortality: grade I, 0 of 1 (0%); grade II, 1 of 2 (50%); grade III, 2 of 3 (66%); grade IV, 28 of 50 (56%); grade V, 29 of 38 (76%); grade VI, 10 of 11 (91%). Overall incidence: grades IV-VI, 99 of 105 (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Parameters measuring physiologic condition, CVRS, and mechanism of injury are significant predictors of outcome in penetrating cardiac injuries. AAST-OIS injury grades I-III are rare in penetrating cardiac trauma. AAST-OIS Injury grades IV-VI are common in penetrating cardiac trauma and accurately predict outcome.

The high morbidity of colostomy closure after trauma: further support for the primary repair of colon injuries.

BACKGROUND: We examined the recent experience of a large urban trauma center to identify overall morbidity and factors predictive of outcome in patients undergoing colostomy closure after trauma. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent colostomy closure after trauma at our institution between January 1992 and August 1996. RESULTS: The mechanism of injury was a gunshot wound in 30 patients (75%), a motor vehicle accident in 6 (15%), a stab wound in 3 (7.5%), and a rectal foreign body in 1 (2.5%). Loop colostomies were performed in 28 patients (70%) and end colostomies were performed in 12 patients (30%). Mean time until colostomy closure was 8 months (range, 0.5 to 28 months). Five patients underwent same admission colostomy closure (SACC). Contrast enemas were performed in 36 patients and found to be abnormal in 2 (6%) patients who were found during planning for SACC to have leaks from rectal trauma at 12 and 19 days after injury. Sixteen complications occurred in 12 patients (30%). Intraoperative complications occurred in two patients (5%) who sustained small and large bowel enterotomies. There were 4 major complications (1 fecal fistula, 1 anastomotic stricture, and 2 small bowel obstructions) in 3 patients (7.5%) and 10 minor complications (25%), 7 prolonged ileus and 3 superficial wound infections. Morbidity was significantly higher for patients whose initial injury involved the colon (11 of 20; 55%) as compared with those whose injury involved the rectum (2 of 16; 12.5%). The demographic, injury, and operative characteristics in the 12 patients with complications and the 28 patients without complications were compared to identify predictors of morbidity. The presence of a colon injury (RR = 7.70; p = 0.009) was a statistically significant predictor of morbidity after colostomy closure. The presence of an initial rectal injury, in contrast, was a predictor of low morbidity after closure (RR = 0.22; p = 0.024). No statistically significant differences were found with respect to age, gender, mode of injury, colostomy type, type of repair, need for laparotomy, or right- versus left-sided colostomy. Clinical trends were noted in five groups in whom the relative risk was greater than 2.0: age older than 30 versus less than 30 years (RR = 2.71; p = 0.079), end versus loop colostomy (RR = 2.33; p = 0.130), operative time greater than 2 versus less than 2 hours RR = 2.80; p = 0.141), estimated blood loss greater than 150 versus less than 150 cc (RR = 2.77; p = 0.079), and right- versus left-sided colostomy (RR = 2.00; p = 0.211). Patients with complications had significantly longer mean operative times (3.84 versus 2.46 hours; p = 0.02), higher mean blood loss (468 versus 142 cc; p = 0.006), and longer mean time until closure (11.3 versus 6.33 months; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Colostomy closure after trauma remains associated with significant morbidity. The patients in whom a colon injury was the indication for initial colostomy experienced high morbidity (55%) after subsequent closure. Patients who had a colostomy for rectal injury had a low morbidity after closure (6.25%). Intraoperative difficulties (longer operative times, higher blood loss) and long delays until colostomy closure increase complication rates. Timely closure may improve outcome after operation for bowel continuity restoration. Morbidity associated with colostomy closure should be considered additional evidence for performing primary repair of colonic injuries. Because the morbidity of colostomy closure after rectal injuries is low, proximal colostomy for extraperitoneal rectal injuries should remain the treatment of choice.

A unified approach to the surgical exposure of pancreatic and duodenal injuries.

One of the greatest challenges to any surgeon is the intraoperative detection and surgical management of duodenal and pancreatic injuries. A uniform approach to the surgical exposure of all suspected pancreatic and duodenal injuries will decrease their morbidity and mortality by identifying all injuries. Proper intraoperative assessment and grading will help with procedure selection from the broad surgical armamentarium available to manage these injuries.

Antigenic assessment of coronaviruses isolated from patients with multiple sclerosis.

Many studies have either supported or discounted the role of coronaviruses as etiologic agents in multiple sclerosis (MS). Two new approaches were applied to investigate this controversy. First, monoclonal antibodies specific for either murine coronaviruses (mouse hepatitis viruses) or human coronaviruses were used to characterize the antigenic features of MS-derived coronaviruses SK and SD. Both isolates were found to have a mouse hepatitis virus-type profile. Second, serum and cerebrospinal fluid antibodies to different coronaviruses, including SD, were measured in MS and control groups. No significant difference in antibody level to coronaviruses was found between MS and control samples. The results of these antigenic studies do not support a specific association between MS and coronaviruses.