Food Security and Clinical Outcomes of the 2017 Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate improvements in food security and health outcomes associated with participation in a produce prescription program. DESIGN: Program evaluation with repeated measures over 6 months. SETTING: Six sites across Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 159 enrolled through primary care sites, 122 participants were considered graduates (attended at least 3 of the 6 monthly visits). The majority of program graduates were Black (78.7%), earned <$25,000 annually (76.6%), and were food insecure (74.2%). INTERVENTION: Six-month program offering group-based nutrition and cooking education along with subsidies for fresh produce worth $1 per family member per day, redeemable weekly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Food security, blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, and glycated hemoglobin. ANALYSIS: Linear mixed models estimating association of change in outcomes with program visits 1-6. Fixed effects included participant sex and age, whereas random effects included random intercepts and slopes for the site of program participation and participants. RESULTS: Participation in a produce prescription program combining subsidies for produce and nutrition education decreased food insecurity (P < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure significantly (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings highlight the promise of this program and similar programs for improving patient food security and health outcomes among the most vulnerable, underserved communities while aiding in setting realistic expectations and suggestions for program implementation.

The effect of an accountable care organization on dental care for children with disabilities.

OBJECTIVES: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are a new model of health-care delivery that aim to improve care through increased provider collaboration and financial rewards for meeting cost and quality targets for a defined patient population. In this study, we examined a state policy change that effectively moved some children with disabilities into a Medicaid-serving pediatric ACO on dental service use. We hypothesize that ACOs' emphasis on prevention, care coordination, and reduction in emergency department use will extend to dental services. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: We used Ohio Medicaid administrative claims data for year 2011-2016 to examine changes in patterns of dental service use by Medicaid-eligible children with disabilities before and after enrolling in an ACO compared with similar children enrolled in non-ACO managed care plans. RESULTS: Dental utilization is relatively low among Medicaid-eligible children with disabilities. We find that preventive dental visits increased 3.1% points (P < 0.05) from a baseline in the control group of 33.9 percent among ACO-enrolled children, especially among adolescent children, compared to similar children that were not in the ACO, representing an 11 percent increase in the rate of preventive dental visits relative to the comparison group. However, overall dental utilization did not increase for children with disabilities who were part of the ACO compared to similar children who were not in the ACO. CONCLUSIONS: Access to dental care is a continuing challenge for children covered by Medicaid. ACOs that serve Medicaid children are well positioned to include dental services and could play an important role in improving access to dental care and increasing dental utilization.

Qualitative research study on addressing barriers to healthy diet among low-income individuals at an urban, safety-net hospital.

BACKGROUND: Some American households experience food insecurity, where access to adequate food is limited by lack of money and other resources. As such, we implemented a free 6-month Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program within a large urban safety-net hospital. METHODS: 32 participants completed a baseline and postintervention qualitative evaluation about food-related behaviour 6 months after study completion. Deductive codes were developed based on the key topics addressed in the interviews; inductive codes were identified from analytically reading the transcripts. Transcripts were coded in MAXQDA V.12 (Release 12.3.2). RESULTS: The information collected in the qualitative interviews highlights the many factors that affect dietary habits, including the environmental and individual influences that play a role in food choices people make. Participants expressed very positive sentiments overall about their programme participation. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention that targets individual behaviour change, enhances nutritional knowledge and skills, and reduces socioeconomic barriers to accessing fresh produce may enhance participant knowledge and self-efficacy around healthy eating. However, socioeconomic factors remain as continual barriers to sustaining healthy eating over the long term. Ongoing efforts that address social determinants of health may be necessary to promote sustainability of behaviour change.