Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Orthod ; 30(6): 614-20, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19054815

ABSTRACT

Secular trends in the facial skull over three Central European samples spanning more than 13 centuries were examined. Data were 43 conventional cephalometric landmark points for samples dating from 680 to 830 AD (29 male Avars), from the mid-19th century (49 adult Hapsburg Monarchy males), and from the 20th century (54 living Austrian young adult males). Analyses by standard methods of geometric morphometrics demonstrated shape differences by data and by size, with a strong interaction of these with sample, in that group mean differences were different for small and large individuals (allometry is different from period to period). The oldest sample, from the Migration Period, exhibited allometric features that may possibly be Turkic. There are implications for the orthodontist interested in growth trends or growth predictions in ethnically mixed patient samples.


Subject(s)
Anatomy, Comparative , Cephalometry , Facial Bones/anatomy & histology , Maxillofacial Development , White People , Anthropology, Physical , History, 15th Century , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, Ancient , History, Medieval , Humans , Male
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 132(1): 63-70, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17628252

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Over the last 100 years, Austrian facial form has changed for various reasons, including changes in growth pattern, changes in shape pattern, or a combination of these. In this study, we explored and contrasted these 2 explanations. METHODS: We compared cephalograms from 54 recruits in the present-day Austrian Federal Army to those from 49 dry skulls of soldiers from the Imperial Hapsburg army. Body height was measured or acquired from military records. Forty-three landmarks were located on each lateral cephalogram. Secular change and growth allometry were analyzed with standard Procrustes methods. RESULTS: Body height correlated only weakly with size of the facial skull in these samples, and secular change in facial size (4.5% over a century) was proportionately less than that in height. Growth allometry was nearly unchanged over the century, emphasizing the typical changes of vertical to horizontal proportions and bimaxillary prognathism. Secular changes over the century took the form of far more localized remodeling around the coronoid process and the anterior maxilla. The large-scale differences, in contrast, were opposite to those one would expect from the size change. CONCLUSIONS: The observed trends shed considerable light on secular changes in the range of dysmorphologies for clinical orthodontic correction. At the same time, the dissociation between within-century and between-century allometry is an important possibility that was hitherto typically observed only at far greater time scales than the 150 years spanned by these data.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/trends , Facial Bones/growth & development , Maxillofacial Development , Anthropology, Physical , Austria , Body Height , Facial Bones/anatomy & histology , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis
3.
J Hum Evol ; 46(6): 679-97, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15183670

ABSTRACT

Molecular data suggest that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees than either is to the gorillas, yet one finds the closest similarity in craniofacial morphology to be among the great apes to the exclusion of humans. To clarify how and when these differences arise in ontogeny, we studied ontogenetic trajectories for Homo sapiens, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla and Pongo pygmaeus. A total of 96 traditional three-dimensional landmarks and semilandmarks on the face and cranial base were collected on 268 adult and sub-adult crania for a geometric morphometric analysis. The ontogenetic trajectories are compared by various techniques, including a new method, relative warps in size-shape space. We find that adult Homo sapiens specimens are clearly separated from the great apes in shape space and size-shape space. Around birth, Homo sapiens infants are already markedly different from the great apes, which overlap at this age but diverge among themselves postnatally. The results suggest that the small genetic differences between Homo and Pan affect early human ontogeny to induce the distinct adult human craniofacial morphology. Pure heterochrony does not sufficiently explain the human craniofacial morphology nor the differences among the African apes.


Subject(s)
Hominidae/anatomy & histology , Hominidae/growth & development , Skull/anatomy & histology , Skull/growth & development , Adult , Animals , Anthropometry/methods , Child , Female , Gorilla gorilla/anatomy & histology , Gorilla gorilla/growth & development , Humans , Infant , Male , Pan paniscus/anatomy & histology , Pan paniscus/growth & development , Pan troglodytes/anatomy & histology , Pan troglodytes/growth & development , Pongo pygmaeus/anatomy & histology , Pongo pygmaeus/growth & development
4.
Ann Anat ; 186(5-6): 471-8, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15646280

ABSTRACT

Craniofacial sexual dimorphism in primates varies in both magnitude and pattern among species. In the past two decades, there has been an increasing emphasis in exploring the correlations of these patterns with taxonomy and the variation in patterns within and among the craniofacial regions. Scrutinising these relationships for hominids, we decompose the craniofacial morphology in five taxa: Homo sapiens, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla and Pongo pygmaeus. 3D coordinates of 35 traditional landmarks and 61 semilandmarks, covering five ridge curves, are measured for each of 268 adult and sub-adult specimens and analysed using geometric morphometric methods. A multivariate analysis in size-shape space shows that ontogenetic scaling contributes to the development of sexual dimorphism in all five taxa, but to a varying extent. In absolute as well as in relative terms P. pygmaeus shows the greatest allometric component, followed by G. gorilla. Homo is intermediate, while in Pan the non-allometric constituent part contributes a large fraction to the actual sexual dimorphism, most markedly in the pygmy chimpanzee. An eigendecomposition of the five vectors of sexual dimorphism reveals two dimensions independent of allometry. One separates orang-utan sexual dimorphism from the African apes and Homo, and the other differentiates between the great apes and Homo with Pan mediating. We discuss these patterns and speculate on their use as characters for taxonomic analysis in the fossil record.


Subject(s)
Facial Bones/anatomy & histology , Hominidae/anatomy & histology , Skull/anatomy & histology , Animals , Female , Gorilla gorilla/anatomy & histology , Humans/anatomy & histology , Male , Sex Characteristics , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...