Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 33(5): 346-351, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28742537

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The recent developments and clinical applications of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-procedures and technologies are going to be presented. RECENT FINDINGS: In experimental as well as clinical settings, NOTES-procedures are predominantly performed in hybrid technique. Current experimental studies focus on the implementation of new surgical approaches as well as on the training of procedures. One emphasis in the clinical application is transrectal and transanal interventions. Transanal total mesorectal excision is equivalent to laparoscopic procedures but with the benefit of an even less invasive access. Transvaginal cholecystectomy can achieve results that are comparable to surgeries that are performed with laparoscopic techniques alone. An analysis of the German NOTES-Register concerning appendectomies as well as the national performance of NOTES-interventions in Switzerland is presented. Apart from intraabdominal approaches, several centers proclaim transoral thyroidectomies and transoral mediastinoscopies. SUMMARY: NOTES-procedures are performed in animal experiments as well as in clinical setting although with less frequency. At this time, hybrid techniques using rigid instruments are mainly applied.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy/methods , Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Thyroidectomy/methods , Cholecystectomy/instrumentation , Cholecystectomy/trends , Humans , Laparoscopy/trends , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/trends , Operative Time , Patient Selection , Thyroidectomy/instrumentation , Thyroidectomy/trends
2.
Ann Surg ; 265(3): 534-538, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27058950

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the feasibility and safety of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) appendectomy, and to analyze separately the transvaginal appendectomy (TVAE) and the transgastric appendectomy (TGAE) procedures. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rare but relevant complications, namely incisional hernias and neuralgia at the trocar sites, which can potentially be avoided by the NOTES techniques. METHODS: The first 217 data sets of the largest NOTES registry worldwide-the German NOTES registry-were analyzed with respect to demographic data, procedural data, and short-term outcomes. Furthermore, TVAEs were compared with TGAEs. RESULTS: Almost all procedures were performed in hybrid technique (median of percutaneous trocars: 1). Median age (TVAE: 30.5 yrs vs TGAE: 25 yrs; P < 0.017), body mass index (TVAE: 22.8 kg/m vs TGAE: 24.1 kg/m; P < 0.016), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (I/II/III; TVAE: 57.1%/41.8%/1.0% vs TGAE: 27.8%/69.4%/2.8%; P < 0.003) significantly differed between both access techniques. Whereas the median number of percutaneous trocars (TVAE: 1 vs TGAE: 1; P < 0.450), the need of additional trocars (TVAE: 6.6% vs TGAE: 13.9%; P < 0.156), the intra, and also postoperative rate of complications (TVAE: 0%/5.5% vs TGAE: 0%/11.1%; P < 1.000/0.258), and the median postoperative hospital stay (TVAE: 3 d vs TGAE: 3 d; P < 0.152) were comparable; the median procedural time (TVAE: 35 minutes vs TGAE: 96 minutes; P < 0.001) and conversion to laparotomy rate (TVAE: 0% vs TGAE: 5.6%; P < 0.023) were significantly less after TVAE. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the largest patient collective so far indicates that hybrid NOTES appendectomy is a safe procedure, with advantages for the transvaginal technique with respect to procedural time and conversion rate.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Endoscopes , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Registries , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/surgery , Conversion to Open Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Multivariate Analysis , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Risk Assessment , Stomach , Treatment Outcome , Vagina , Young Adult
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(2): 259-67, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25533898

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The proposed advantages of NOTES are aimed to assess the comparison with standard procedures. Complications are a major focus of its evaluation. We initiated a prospective comparison between transvaginal hybrid appendectomy versus laparoscopic appendectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For each, NOTES and laparoscopic appendectomy, 10 consecutive female patients participated in the study with follow-up documentation for 35 days and after 1 year. Transvaginal appendectomy was considered a non-standard medical procedure and required individual patient's consent. Pre- and postoperative gynecological examinations were performed. Questionnaire-based evaluation included issues related to quality of life in addition to objective clinical findings. The study is approved by the ethics committee of the University of Rostock. RESULTS: All women returned questionnaires for evaluation. Age and BMI are comparable. Overall procedure time was significantly shorter in laparoscopy. The only postoperative complication consisted of an intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy. One patient of the NOTES group suffered from new abdominal pain 3 weeks postoperatively; a mini-laparoscopy showed a normal situation. Significant differences (p < 0.05) of the questionnaire-based comparison with advantages for the NOTES group were found in following items: reduced activity at day 1-14, postoperative pain at day 1, general health conditions at day 1-3 and quality of life at day 3. NOTES patients wished significantly earlier to be discharged and started significantly earlier with activities, but no differences existed after 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal flexible appendectomy appears to be a safe procedure performed in hybrid technique. Data from the study point to shortened recovery intervals and improved quality of life.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Vagina/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 23(5): 547-50, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18256848

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) refers to a new surgical procedure using flexible endoscopes in the abdominal cavity. With this procedure, access is gained by way of organs which are reached through a natural, already-existing external orifice. The hoped-for advantages associated with this method include the reduction of post-operative wound pain, shorter convalescence, avoidance of wound infection and abdominal-wall hernias as well as the absence of scars. We performed a trans-vaginal appendectomy on a human subject. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In experimental operations on animals, we first evaluated the trans-vaginal access site. After them, we started first operation in human. The procedure was carried out under preventive administration of antibiotics. We used a therapeutic single-canal gastroscope. The appendix was located after exploration of the abdomen. After preparation of the mesenteriolum, ligature of the appendix base was performed by means of endoloop, followed by transsection with scissors. Recovery of the specimen was achieved by pulling it out with the instrument. RESULTS: On the evening of the day on which surgery had taken place, administration of nourishment was begun. After the procedure, the patient reported slight soreness in the muscles of the abdominal wall; she felt otherwise perfectly well. INTERPRETATION: In the space of a year, the first operations have been performed on human subjects by a few select work groups. NOTES procedures are still in the initial stages of clinical development. Until they can be introduced into surgical daily routine, further improvements are required as to equipment, technology and operative procedure.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Adult , Appendectomy/instrumentation , Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/pathology , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Pliability , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
5.
Surg Today ; 33(2): 89-94, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12616367

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Both surgical and conservative treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) are controversial. The aim of this prosepective study was to examine outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. METHODS: The subjects were 143 patients who underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Following diagnostic procedures 126 patients were allocated to a total fundoplication group (360 degrees C, Nissen-DeMeester) and 17, to a posterior semifundoplication group (250-270 degrees, Toupet). All complications were registered, and pathophysiological and outcome data were examined 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery. RESULTS: By 6 months after surgery the mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure had improved significantly, to 14.8 mmHg in the Nissen-DeMeester group, and to 12.1 mmHg in the Toupet group, corresponding to successful prevention of esophageal reflux in both groups. Dysphagia was more common in the early postoperative period after total fundic wrap (17% vs12%), but this difference disappeared in time. All patients reported complete relief of reflux symptoms, although two of those who underwent the Nissen-DeMeester fundoplication experienced relapse of GERD and required open reconstruction (1.4%). The laparoscopic procedure was converted to open surgery in three patients (2%). There were no associated deaths and the perioperative complication rate was 4.2%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an effective treatment for GERD. More than 93% of the patients in this series rated their outcome as good to excellent following the operation.


Subject(s)
Fundoplication , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Laparoscopy , Adult , Aged , Esophagogastric Junction/physiopathology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
6.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 12(3): 154-9, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12080254

ABSTRACT

Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), an increase in accidental common bile duct (CBD) injuries of up to 1.2-1.6% has been reported. In the present prospective study of 1,710 patients undergoing cholecystectomy (1,241 LC procedures and 469 open cholecystectomies [OC]), we tested the predicative value of routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). The IOC was feasible in 92.4% of the cases in the LC group and in 83% of cases in the OC group and presented a complete depiction of the extrahepatic bile system in 98.3%. Anatomic variations of the bile duct system, which influenced the operative management, were found in 13.2% of cases (13.4% LC versus 12.8% OC). In 2.5% of the patients, preoperatively undetected CBD stones were also found. Method-specific complications did not occur in any of the patients. Additionally, in a controlled subgroup analysis of 163 patients, we evaluated preoperative intravenous cholangiography (IVC) and IOC. Intravenous cholangiography showed only 72.4% of the operation-relevant anatomic variations (vs. 100% by IOC); in 6.1% of the cases, there were reactions to the dye (vs. none in IOC), and in only 28.6% of the patients, CBD stones were detected (vs. 71.4% IOC). There were four bile duct injuries (0.29%) during LC and two (0.4%) during OC. All injuries were detected intraoperatively and fixed in the same setting without postoperative complications. In conclusion, we recommend the use of routine IOC during cholecystectomy. By this technique, anatomic variations of the bile duct system will be visualized and therefore accidental injuries will be avoided.


Subject(s)
Cholangiography/methods , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholelithiasis/diagnosis , Cholelithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Common Bile Duct/injuries , Common Bile Duct/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gallstones/diagnosis , Gallstones/diagnostic imaging , Gallstones/surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Radionuclide Imaging , Time Factors
7.
Infect Immun ; 70(3): 1558-65, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11854244

ABSTRACT

We previously demonstrated that genes encoding a putative two-component histidine kinase (CHK1) or a response regulator (CSSK1) are each required for virulence in a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis and that strains with each gene deleted are also defective in morphogenesis under certain growth conditions. In the present study, the role of these two genes in the adherence to and colonization of reconstituted human esophageal tissue (RHE) is described. We compared strains of Candida albicans with deletions of chk1 (strain CHK21) and cssk1 (strain CSSK21) to wild-type cells (CAF2), as well as strains with CHK1 and CSSK1 reconstituted (strains CHK23 and CSSK23, respectively). Adherence and colonization of RHE were evaluated in periodic acid-Schiff-stained sections, as well as by SEM. We observed that both deletion-containing strains colonized the RHE to a lesser extent than did CAF2 and that the percent germination by both strains was reduced in comparison to that of control strains at 1 h postinfection. Expression of CHK1 or CSSK1 was quantitated by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR from RHE tissues infected with wild-type C. albicans yeast cells. Expression of both CHK1 and CSSK1 increased over the 48-h period following infection of the tissue, although expression of CHK1 was greater than that of CSSK1. By RT-PCR, we have also shown that expression of CHK1 and CSSK1 in the strains with cssk1 and chk1 deleted, respectively, was similar to that of CAF2, indicating that CHK1 and CSSK1 do not regulate each other but probably encode signal proteins of different pathways. Our observations indicate that CHK1 and CSSK1 are each partially required for colonization and conversion to filamentous growth on RHE tissue.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans/genetics , Candidiasis/etiology , Epithelial Cells/microbiology , Esophagus/microbiology , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Protein Kinases/genetics , Candida albicans/pathogenicity , Cell Adhesion , Cells, Cultured , Checkpoint Kinase 1 , Epithelial Cells/cytology , Esophagus/cytology , Fungal Proteins/biosynthesis , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Genes, Fungal , Humans , Protein Kinases/biosynthesis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...