[From chronic disease to multimorbidity: Which impact on organization of health care]. / De la maladie chronique à la multimorbidité : quel impact sur l'organisation des soins de santé ?

Healthcare systems are concerned with the growing prevalence of chronic diseases. Single disease approach, based on the Chronic Care Model, is known to improve specific indicators for the targeted disease. However, the co-existence of several chronic disease, or multimorbidity, within a same patient is the most frequent situation. The fragmentation of care, as consequence of the single disease approach, has negative impact on the patient and healthcare professionals. A person centred approach is a method addressing the combination of health issues of each patient. The coordination and synthesis role is key to ensure continuity of care for the patient within a network of healthcare professionals from several settings of care. This function is the main characteristic of an organized first level of care.

[HIV infection. A chronic disease that redefines collaboration between general practitioners and specialists. A qualitative study on opportunities and obstacles to collaboration]. / L’infection par le VIH : une maladie chronique redéfinissant la collaboration entre généralistes et spécialistes. Obstacles et opportunités.

PURPOSE: With the development of antiretroviral therapy, Human Immunodeficiency Virus [HIV) infection has become a chronic disease. In order to develop an efficient response to this new challenge, there is a need for closer collaboration between specialized units and general practitioners. This article identifies the opportunities for and the barriers to this collaboration. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients living with HIV, general practitioners working in multidisciplinary group practice using the capitation system and infectiologists from one Belgian urban area. Interviews focused one xperiences and expectations in relation to diagnosis, follow-up and collaboration between general practitioners and infectiologists. RESULTS: Overall, infectiologists and general practitioners aspire to improved communication and collaboration. There are overlaps between general practitioner's and infectiologist's field of action. The general practitioner's intervention is sometimes restricted to common uncomplicated or psychosocial problems, in the context of unplanned and short contacts.Infectiologists prefer to focus on HIV problems, leaving general practitioners to take care of these patients' other health problems. The patient may be an obstacle to greater involvement of general practitioners due to fear of stigmatization from his family and social circle or lack of confidence in the general practitioner's skills. CONCLUSION: This research underlines the difficulties and gaps in the care of HIV patients and provides preliminary explanations for the lack of active cooperation between general practitioners and infectiologists. Overlaps between the areas of professional skills can result in uncovered aspects of care, which can have a negative impact on patients, but also on general practitioners and infectiologists. Collaboration between general practitioners and infectiologists should be based on a concerted decision, with clear allocation of tasks, taking into account the patient's expectations.