Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(1): 106-113, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30607789

ABSTRACT

Cancer is the leading social and healthcare problem of the twenty-first century. The aim of primary prevention is to decrease the incidence of cancer by avoiding the known causes and risk factors. Nevertheless, it has been estimated that cancer diagnoses could be halved through primary prevention measures. A comprehensive review of the scientific evidence regarding the main carcinogens and risk factors and primary prevention recommendations have been put forth based on this evidence. The GRADE scale has been used to classify the grade of evidence. We present the scientific evidence and recommendations for primary prevention of the major modifiable risk factors: smoking, alcohol, diet, obesity, physical activity, occupational and environmental factors, ultraviolet radiation, infections, and socioeconomic factors. Primary prevention is a simple, effective means to lower the incidence of cancer. Preventive measures must be circulated in the fight against cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Primary Prevention , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Management , Humans , Neoplasms/etiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Societies, Medical
2.
J Transl Med ; 15(1): 62, 2017 03 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28320414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inguinal orchiectomy is curative in 70-80% of clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumours (CS I TGCT). The identification of patients who are at low risk of relapse is critical to avoid unnecessary treatment. The aim of this study is to explore EGFR, hMLH-1/hMSH-2 and microsatellite instability (MSI) as potential prognostic factors of recurrence in CS I TGCT. METHODS: Fifty-six CS I TGCT patients who underwent inguinal orchiectomy were included in this study. We analysed the relationship between clinicopathological and molecular factors with survival. Analysis of hMLH1, hMSH2 and EGFR expression was carried out by immunohistochemistry. Methylation status of the hMLH1 promoter was determined by pyrosequencing analysis in selected cases. EGFR exons 19, 20, 21 were analysed by PCR labeled-fragments and MSI status was determined using standard Multiplex MSI assays. RESULTS: Classical pathological factors such as lymphovascular invasion, high percentage of embryonal carcinoma, rete testis invasion or tumour size ≥4 cm showed a significant relationship with a higher risk of relapse. Additionally, it was found that an epididymis invasion proved to be a significant independent poor prognostic factor of recurrence (p = 0.001). hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression showed no significant association with risk of relapse and no MSI was found. EGFR expression was observed in 30.4% of samples and its expression was associated with higher risk of relapse (HR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3-9.8; p = 0.016). None of the cases presented EGFR kinase domain mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Epididymis invasion and EGFR expression, but not hMLH-1/hMSH-2 or MSI, could be potentially useful as new prognostic factors of recurrence for CS I TGCT.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Epididymis/pathology , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/metabolism , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/metabolism , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , DNA Methylation/genetics , Demography , Disease-Free Survival , Exons/genetics , Genome, Human , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Microsatellite Instability , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/metabolism , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/genetics , Prognosis , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Risk Factors , Testicular Neoplasms/genetics
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 18(8): 805-12, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26542177

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) is controversial. There are different therapeutic schedules but without a clear orientation about which of them should be used in each clinical situation. In addition, when patients suffer a second recurrence or they have poor performance status, they are excluded from clinical trials, although second recurrences and poor performance status are indeed more and more real and common situations in the clinical setting. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of fotemustine (FTM) in HGG [fundamentally, glioblastomas (GB)], independent of time of recurrence or performance status. METHODS/PATIENTS: Retrospective study in HGG patients treated with FTM in second or further line according to standard, the Addeo or any other scheme, starting treatment prior to 30 November 2012. Included patients reflect the regular situation in which the drug is used in terms of comorbidities and analytic situation (hematologic, renal and hepatic functions). Response assessment was performed by MRI and according to the clinical protocols of each center (every 8-12 weeks). Clinical situation and supportive care drugs were evaluated in each medical consultation. Clinical end-points analyzed, among others, were: PFS-6, PFS, OS, response rates, toxicity, quality of life and neurocognitive impact. RESULTS: In terms of activity, an overall response rate of 8 % was observed: partial response 6 % (7 patients) and complete response 2 % (2 patients). The median time to achieve the greater response with FTM was 73 days (4-841 days). Patients treated according to the Addeo schedule had a shorter time to greater response in comparison with other schedules (85.9 vs 114 days), although without statistical significance. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) when comparing different FTM schedules or using FTM in first or second recurrence. Median PFS: 3 months. PFS-6: 30.3 %. Overall survival (OS): although without significant differences, a tendency to better survival when using the Addeo schedule versus other schedules was observed (at 6 months, 44.6 vs 34.5 %; at 12 months, 25 vs 23.6 %; at 18 months, 11.5 vs 7.9 %), as well as if earlier use (second vs third line) concerning OS-12 (33.7 vs 18.2 %). Median OS: 5.2 months. Grades 3-4 toxicity was 28 % (31 patients), being neutropenia (4 %) and thrombocytopenia (17 %) the most frequent adverse reactions. From quality of life and neuro-cognitive function perspectives, 11 patients (10 %) and 16 (14 %) improved the Karnofsky Index and neurological impairment, respectively, after FTM treatment. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that FTM is safe and has a comparable activity with other available therapeutic options of use in the treatment of recurrent HGG.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Glioma/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Nitrosourea Compounds/therapeutic use , Organophosphorus Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Glioma/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 10(7): 426-32, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18628072

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is a common problem in patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy and is normally associated with a negative impact on patients' quality of life (QOL), poor cancer control and diminished survival. In clinical trials, recombinant human erythropoietin has been shown to correct and prevent anaemia, decrease the need for blood transfusions and improve cancer patients' QOL. METHODS: A retrospective study followed lung cancer patients who received first-line chemotherapy in our hospital in 1998 and in 2005. The incidence of anaemia was analysed, as was the impact of incorporating erythropoietin into the treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of anaemia was 68% (69% of which reported asthenia) in 1998 vs. 54% (60% with asthenia) in 2005. The comparison of anaemia rates (1998 vs. 2005) were grade 1 (16% vs. 32%), grade 2 (36% vs. 16%), grade 3 (16% vs. 5%) and grade 4 (none). Treatment for anaemia included transfusion 52%, intravenous iron 5% and epoetin 4% in 1998. In 2005 anaemia was treated with transfusion 9%, intravenous iron 41%, and epoetin 49%. Median survival (1998 vs. 2005) was 242 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 217-329) vs. 356 days (95% CI 322-382). CONCLUSIONS: Erythropoietin is a valid alternative for cancer patients with anaemia undergoing chemotherapy. It can possibly avoid the need for transfusions without negatively impacting survival.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Blood Transfusion , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anemia/chemically induced , History, 17th Century , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Quality of Life , Recombinant Proteins , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...