Effect of uncertainty on the time course for selection of verbal name codes.

Response selection takes time. Hick's law (Hick, 1952) predicts that the time course of response selection is a logarithmic function of the number of equally likely response alternatives. However, recent work has shown that oculomotor responses constitute noteworthy exceptions in that the latencies of saccades (Kveraga, Boucher, & Hughes, 2002) and smooth pursuit movements (Berryhill, Kveraga, Boucher, & Hughes, 2004) are completely independent of response uncertainty. This finding extends to the case in which the required response was known in advance (i.e., simple reaction times [RTs] were equivalent to choice RTs). In view of these results, we reevaluated reports that latencies to name visually presented digits (Experiment 1) and/or repeat aurally presented digits (Experiment 2) are similarly independent of the size of the response set. We found that naming latencies were equivalent for response set sizes from one to eight, but simple RTs (response set of one) were faster. Thus, the overlearned task of digit naming is indeed highly automatic but has not reached the level of automaticity characteristic of the oculomotor system.

Vibrotactile temporal summation: probability summation or neural integration?

Temporal summation, a decrease in the detection threshold that occurs when either the duration of a stimulus or the number of stimuli in a sequence is increased, has been attributed to the operations of either the mechanism of neural integration or of probability summation. Our experiments indicate that under certain conditions, both mechanisms may operate, but that the process of neural integration is an exclusive characteristic of the Pacinian (P) channel. The P channel was isolated by applying 250 Hz stimuli through a 1.5 cm2 contactor to the thenar eminence of the hand and the NPII channel was isolated by applying the stimuli through a 0.01 cm2 contactor. The finding that the slopes of the psychometric functions were the same within both channels indicated that probability summation could not account for temporal summation for stimulus durations less than 1 s. The finding that the threshold for the detection of multiple-pulse stimuli increased as the interpulse interval increased indicated that, for time intervals less than 800 ms, temporal summation results from neural integration. But for interstimulus intervals greater than 800 ms, probability summation accounts for temporal summation.