Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Work ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The concept of ergonomics in health services is attracting significant attention in the scientific community. There is a need for an integrated study presenting a summary of the published literature backed by detailed bibliometric characteristics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a summary of the published literature supported by detailed bibliometric properties. METHODS: Within the scope of this study, a total of 3008 articles on ergonomics in the health field were reviewed and analyzed using a bibliometric method. RESULTS: It reveals the trends of the publications conducted between 1999-2023, and defines the common citation structure between the articles, bibliographic coupling, and keyword co-occurrences. This study presents a knowledge map of ergonomics studies conducted in the health field using a bibliometric analysis method. CONCLUSION: The research results provide comprehensive information to the relevant literature, and define global research focuses and future scopes. This serves as a guide for academics to understand developments in the field of ergonomics and health more easily and quickly.

2.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 52(2): 130-133, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378876

ABSTRACT

This discussion paper aims to examine the potential benefits and limitations of using artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in nursing practice, with a particular focus on the ChatGPT example. The study discusses how chatbots can serve as a valuable tool for nurses' continuing education, consultation, and information access. It is suggested that ChatGPT can contribute to enhancing nurses' knowledge and skill levels, providing rapid and accurate information, and improving time management. However, the potential risks and limitations of using AI chatbots have also been evaluated. The study highlights the possibility of negative impacts on the nurse-patient relationship due to chatbots' inadequacy in emotional and empathetic communication. Additionally, concerns about chatbots providing inaccurate or biased information and issues regarding data privacy are addressed. The review draws attention to the limited existing literature on the use of AI chatbots in nursing and emphasizes the need for expanding research in this area. Future studies are suggested to focus on identifying the necessary training and support resources for nurses to effectively utilize this technology. This study underscores an important ethical and professional point for nurses, reminding them not to overlook the significance of human touch and emotional connection while evaluating the advantages offered by technology.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Clinical Competence , Humans , Language , Technology , Touch
3.
Nurse Educ Pract ; 72: 103775, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37683366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is crucial for nursing students to possess self-efficacy in medication administration to children for correct drug implementation. It is expected that nursing students enhance their clinical application skills in the pediatric field before graduation, execute the clinical decision-making process, and acquire self-efficacy in medication administration. AIM: This research was conducted to examine the self-efficacy and clinical decision-making levels of nursing students in the context of medication administration to children. METHODS: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted with 368 students. The data were collected using the "Participant Information Form", the "Medication Administration Self-Efficacy Scale in Children for Nursing Students", and the "Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale". Number, percentage, minimum and maximum values, mean and standard deviation, Independent Samples T-Test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation test were used in the analysis of the data. In addition, Cronbach's Alpha coefficient was calculated to evaluate the reliability of the scales. The research report of the study followed the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: In the study, the mean score of the students on the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale was slightly low; the mean score of the Medication Administration Self-Efficacy Scale in Children for Nursing Students was found to be moderate; and a significant and negative relationship was determined between the two scales. The clinical decision-making levels of the male students, the fourth-year nursing students, and those who did not experience anxiety during medication administration were found to be significantly higher. The self-efficacy of the students who did not experience anxiety during medication administration to children was found to be significantly higher than the others. CONCLUSION: Nursing students need to possess self-efficacy in administering medication to children and be able to make clinical decisions. Given the significant impact of the clinical decision-making process on patient outcomes and safety, it is necessary to develop educational programs to enhance the clinical decision-making abilities of nursing students. Different educational methods that will increase students' self-efficacy in medication administration to children need to be implemented.

4.
Hemodial Int ; 27(4): 411-418, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37318078

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Use of a stress ball is a known t non-pharmacological method to distract attention and to relieve stress and anxiety. The goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of stress ball use on anxiety and depression in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: The study utilized a single-blind, balanced crossover design. There were two sequential 4-week intervention periods separated by a 4-day washout period. During one intervention period stress ball use at home was encouraged while the other 4-week "intervention" period served as a control. The order in which the two evaluation periods were applied was randomized for a given patient. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale before and after each 4-week intervention period. FINDINGS: A total of 65 patients participated in this study. There were statistically significant reductions in both anxiety (p < 0.001) and depression (p < 0.001) during the stress ball intervention periods vs. no change during the control interventions. A delayed follow-up evaluation showed that the anxiety level of patients remained reduced after 1 month of no longer using a stress ball. DISCUSSION: The use of a stress ball at home for 4 weeks significantly decreased anxiety and depression levels in our group of hemodialysis patients.


Subject(s)
Depression , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Cross-Over Studies , Depression/etiology , Depression/therapy , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/therapy
5.
Afr Health Sci ; 21(3): 1107-1116, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35222573

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has raised the global public health concern and has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to examine the clinical course and outcomes of the patients with COVID-19 in the southeastern part of Turkey. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on the files of 173 patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19. The "COVID-19 Case Information Form" in the patients' medical records was used. RESULTS: Of the patients with COVID-19, 64.2% were male and 16.2% had a chronic disease. Their mean age was 34.76±25.75 years. Cough and fatigue were the most common clinical symptoms at admission with 38.7%. The patients at the age of 65 and over were treated mostly in the intensive care unit, and the symptoms associated with the cardiovascular and nausea and vomiting were observed more often (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the majority of the patients were male and there were differences between the age groups in terms of transmission route, the clinic where they were being followed-up, some symptoms, and clinical status outcome. It is recommended that multi-center, prospective, experimental, or observational studies with larger samples should be and the patients should be followed-up for longer periods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitals, State , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...