Spontaneous intracranial hypotension secondary to anterior thoracic osteophyte: Resolution after primary dural repair via posterior approach.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is an uncommon syndrome widely attributed to CSF hypovolemia, typically secondary to spontaneous CSF leak. Although commonly associated with postural headache and variable neurological symptoms, one of the most severe consequences of SIH is bilateral subdural hematomas with resultant neurological deterioration. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a patient diagnosed with SIH secondary to an anteriorly positioned thoracic osteophyte with resultant dural disruption, who after multiple attempts at nonsurgical management developed bilateral subdural hematomas necessitating emergent surgical intervention. The patient underwent a unilateral posterior repair of his osteophyte with successful anterior decompression. At 36months follow up, the patient reported completely resolved headaches with no focal neurological deficits. DISCUSSION: We outline our posterior approach to repair of the dural defect and review the management algorithm for the treatment of patients with SIH. We also examine the current hypotheses as to the origin, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome. CONCLUSION: A posterior approach was utilized to repair the dural defect caused by an anterior thoracic osteophyte in a patient with severe SIH complicated by bilateral subdural hematomas. This approach minimizes morbidity compared to an anterior approach and allowed for removal of the osteophyte and repair of the dural defect.

Conjoined lumbar nerve roots: a frequently underappreciated congenital abnormality.

Nerve root anomalies are frequently underrecognized on advanced imaging studies and may account for some percentage of failed spinal surgical procedures. The conjoined nerve root represents the most common nerve root anomaly. It is a well-known cause of false-positive readings for bulging and herniated disks in patients with purely axial neuroimaging studies. A retrospective evaluation of consecutive microsurgical lumbar diskectomies in 80 patients during a 5-year period was undertaken. A total of four patients (5%) were found intraoperatively to have evidence of a conjoined nerve root by the classification of Neidre. None was diagnosed preoperatively. Coronal magnetic resonance imaging offers the best means of visualizing a conjoined nerve root. The chance for a successful operation can be significantly enhanced if the surgeon is prepared to encounter this pathology.

Acute sports-related spinal cord injury: contemporary management principles.

Improvements in helmet and equipment design have led to significant decreases in overall injury incidence, but no available helmet can prevent catastrophic injury to the neck and cervical spine. The most effective strategy for preventing this type of injury appears to be careful instruction, training, and regulations designed to eliminate head-first contact. The incidence of football-related quadriplegia has decreased from a peak of 13 cases per one million players between 1976 and 1980 to 3 per million from 1991 to 1993, mostly as a result of systematic research and an organized effort to eliminate high-risk behavior. An episode of transient quadriparesis does not appear to be a risk factor for catastrophic spinal cord injury. Torg reported that 0 of 117 quadriplegics in the National Football Head and Neck Injuries Registry recalled a prior episode of transient quadriparesis, and 0 of the 45 patients originally studied in his transient quadriparesis cohort have subsequently suffered quadriplegia. The significance of developmental spinal stenosis is unclear. Plain radiographic identification of a narrow spinal canal in a player sustaining cervical cord neurapraxia warrants further evaluation by MRI to rule out functional stenosis. The presence of actual cord deformation or compression on MRI should preclude participation in high-risk contact or collision sports.

Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting.

Although autogenous iliac bone is frequently used for bone graft, many well-documented complications are associated with this procedure-including chronic pain; nerve, arterial, and ureteral injury; herniation of abdominal contents; sacroiliac joint instability; pelvic fractures; hematoma; and infection. An understanding of the morbidities associated with bone graft harvesting and of the strategies for avoiding them is imperative for surgeons using this grafting source. In addition, although synthetic grafting materials are considered relatively expensive compared with autogenous sources, the majority of physicians are unaware of the actual direct and indirect costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting. Contemporary allograft and synthetic grafting composites are being developed to optimize and surpass the native qualities of autogenous sources (ie, osteogenesis, osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity). Careful comparison of the cost of these alternative sources with the physical and monetary costs of autogenous bone graft will undoubtedly make allograft, recombinant, synthetic graft composites the logical choice in the very near future.

Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bone grafting is used to augment bone healing and provide stability after spinal surgery. Autologous bone graft is limited in quantity and unfortunately associated with increased surgical time and donor-site morbidity. Alternatives to bone grafting in spinal surgery include the use of allografts, osteoinductive growth factors such as bone morphogenetic proteins and various synthetic osteoconductive carriers. PURPOSE: Recent research has provided insight into methods that may modulate the bone healing process at the cellular level in addition to reversing the effects of symptomatic disc degeneration, which is a potentially disabling condition, managed frequently with various fusion procedures. With many adjuncts and alternatives available for use in spinal surgery, a concise review of the current bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery is necessary. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A systematic review of the contemporary English literature on bone grafting in spinal surgery, including abstract information presented at national meetings. METHODS: Bone grafting alternatives were reviewed as to their efficacy in extending or replacing autologous bone graft sources in spinal applications. RESULTS: Alternatives to autologous bone graft include allograft bone, demineralized bone matrix, recombinant growth factors and synthetic implants. Each of these alternatives could possibly be combined with autologous bone marrow or various growth factors. Although none of the presently available substitutes provides all three of the fundamental properties of autograft bone (osteogenicity, osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity), there are a number of situations in which they have proven clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: Alternatives to autogenous bone grafting find their greatest appeal when autograft bone is limited in supply or when acceptable rates of fusion may be achieved with these substitutes (or extenders) despite the absence of one or more of the properties of autologous bone graft. In these clinical situations, the morbidity of autograft harvest is reasonably avoided. Future research may discover that combinations of materials may cumulatively result in the expression of osteogenesis, osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity found in autogenous sources.