Effects of JNJ-40929837, a leukotriene A4 hydrolase inhibitor, in a bronchial allergen challenge model of asthma.

UNLABELLED: Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a chemotactic mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma. JNJ-40929837 is an oral inhibitor of LTA4 hydrolase, which catalyzes LTB4 production. We evaluated the effects of JNJ-40929837 in a human bronchial allergen challenge (BAC) model. In this double-blind, 3-period crossover study, 22 patients with mild, atopic asthma were randomized to one of three treatments per period: 100 mg/day JNJ-40929837 for 6 days followed by 50 mg/day on day 7; 10 mg/day montelukast for 6 days; and matched placebo. The BAC was performed on day 6 of each treatment period. Primary outcome was BAC-induced late asthmatic response (LAR) measured by maximal percent reduction in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in one second. Secondary outcomes included early asthmatic response (EAR) by maximal percent reduction in FEV1, EAR and LAR evaluated by area under the FEV1/time curve (AUC0-2, AUC3-10, respectively), change in baseline FEV1 after 5-day treatment, safety, and correlation of JNJ-40929837 to the divalent cation ionophore A23187-stimulated whole blood LTB4 levels and sputum basal LTB4 levels. No significant differences were observed in the primary or secondary FEV1 endpoints with JNJ-40929837 versus placebo. Compared with placebo (n = 17, LS mean = 27.7), there was no significant attenuation of the maximal percent reduction in the LAR FEV1 with JNJ-40929837 (n = 16, LS mean = 28.6, P = 0.63) but montelukast (n = 17, LS mean = 22.6, P = 0.01) significantly attenuated the LAR. JNJ-40929837 substantially inhibited LTB4 production in whole blood, decreased sputum LTB4 levels and was well-tolerated. The number of adverse events leading to study withdrawal was the same in JNJ-40929837 and placebo groups. In conclusion, JNJ-40929837 demonstrated target engagement in blood and sputum. No significant impact in response to allergen inhalation was observed with JNJ-40929837 versus placebo. REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01241422.

Stage Ib cervical cancer during pregnancy: planned delay in treatment--case report.

Approximately 0.05% of pregnancies are complicated with cervical cancer. Treatment of this malignancy during pregnancy depends on the stage of disease and gestational age at the time of diagnosis. In women with Stage IB cervical cancer immediate treatment, without regard to the pregnancy, is traditionally advocated in the first and second trimester. A planned delay of treatment, to achieve foetal maturity, may be acceptable if there are no adverse maternal and foetal consequences. We present a case of a Stage IB1 cervical cancer, diagnosed during a twin pregnancy, and treated with a planned delay of 19 weeks. We have reviewed the literature and focused on what is known about planned delay in therapy of Stage IB cervical cancer, diagnosed before 30 weeks of gestational age.

Prognostic significance of p53, Her-2, and EGFR overexpression in borderline and epithelial ovarian cancer.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of p53, Her-2, and EGFR in borderline and epithelial ovarian cancer. Tumor tissue from 85 patients with borderline and 783 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer stage I-IV were analyzed immunohistochemically for p53 positivity and over-expression of Her-2 and EGFR. In the ovarian cancer (OC) group 415 patients (53%) had p53-positive tumors, 272 (35%) had tumors with Her-2 over-expression, and 483 (62%) had over-expression of EGFR. In the OC group the classical prognostic factors (older age, higher FIGO stage, and poorer differentiated stage) had significant prognostic value in both uni- and multivariate analyses. Multivariate analyses in the OC group proved p53 positivity to increase mortality significantly depending on the grade of the tumor. Her-2 likewise increased the risk of mortality significantly in this group depending on the grade of the tumor. EGFR on the other hand did not have any additional prognostic effect in the OC group after adjustment for the classical prognostic and molecular factors was made. In the borderline group Her-2 and EGFR over-expression in combination, adjusted for age and p53, significantly improved the prognosis.

A randomised phase II multicentre trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) using four different schedules in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The purpose of this phase II trial was to compare the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of four irinotecan schedules for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. In total, 174 5-fluorouracil pretreated patients were randomised to: arm A (n=41), 350 mg m(-2) irinotecan as a 90-min i.v. infusion q3 weeks; arm B (n=38), 125 mg m(-2) irinotecan as a 90-min i.v. infusion weekly x 4 weeks q6 weeks; arm C (n=46), 250 mg m(-2) irinotecan as a 90-min i.v. infusion q2 weeks; or arm D (n=49), 10 mg m(-2) day(-1) irinotecan as a 14-day continuous infusion q3 weeks. No significant differences in efficacy across the four arms were observed, although a shorter time to treatment failure was noted for arm D (1.7 months; P=0.02). Overall response rates were in the range 5-11%. Secondary end points included median survival (6.4-9.4 months), and time to progression (2.7-3.8 months) and treatment failure (1.7-3.2 months). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities, although the toxicity profile between arms A, B, and C and D did differ. Generally, significantly less haematologic toxicity, alopecia and cholinergic syndrome were observed in arm D; however, there was a trend for increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Irinotecan is an effective and safe second-line treatment for colorectal cancer. The schedules examined yielded equivalent results, indicating that there is no advantage of the prolonged vs short infusion schedules.

Long-term follow-up confirms a survival advantage of the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen over the cyclophosphamide-cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer.

Two independent and consecutive randomized clinical trials, conducted by the American Gynecological Oncology Group and by an European-Canadian Intergroup, have shown superiority, in clinical response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, of a cisplatin-paclitaxel regimen over cisplatin-cyclophosphamide given as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The results of these studies, published with a median follow-up of about 3 years, have been updated with a 6.5-year follow-up: In each case, an 11% absolute gain in survival favoring the paclitaxel arm is shown; this advantage remains both statistically and clinically significant and supports a role for paclitaxel in frontline chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Phase II study of vinorelbine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate on an intent-to-treat basis the activity and toxicity of single-agent vinorelbine (VRL) as second-line chemotherapy of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Platinum-resistant disease was defined as disease refractory to or relapsing within 12 months after finishing platinum-containing chemotherapy. METHODS: VRL (30 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously as a bolus injection days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Initially, four courses of VRL were given. Patients with responding or stable disease received four more courses of VRL to a maximum of eight courses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 33 eligible patients were considered evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 21% (7/33) (95% CI: 7--35). Median time to progression was 3.1 months and median survival was 10.1 months. Toxicity was generally mild. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. CALGB grade III/IV infection was observed in 15/0% of patients. The most important nonhematologic toxicities were nausea and constipation. Grade III/IV nausea was observed in 6/0% and grade III/IV constipation in 3/3% of patients. Peripheral neurotoxicity was only a minor problem with no grade III/IV toxicity. No patients stopped treatment because of toxicity and no toxic death was reported. CONCLUSION: VRL was generally well tolerated, but the activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer was only modest, although fully comparable to other second-line treatments. Further studies are required to define the role of VRL in combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on prognostic factors in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma have been too small for robust conclusions to be reached. We undertook a retrospective study in a large international database to identify the most important prognostic variables. METHODS: 1545 patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage I) were included. The records of these patients were examined and data extracted for univariate and multivariate analysis of disease-free survival in relation to various clinical and pathological variables. FINDINGS: The multivariate analyses identified degree of differentiation as the most powerful prognostic indicator of disease-free survival (moderately vs well differentiated hazard ratio 3.13 [95% CI 1.68-5.85], poorly vs well differentiated 8.89 [4.96-15.9]), followed by rupture before surgery (2.65 [1.53-4.56]), rupture during surgery (1.64 [1.07-2.51]), FIGO 1973 stage Ib vs Ia 1.70 [1.01-2.85]) and age (per year 1.02 [1.00-1.03]). When the effects of these factors were accounted for, none of the following were of prognostic value: histological type, dense adhesions, extracapsular growth, ascites, FIGO stage 1988, and size of tumour. INTERPRETATION: Degree of differentiation, the most powerful prognostic indicator in stage I ovarian cancer, should be used in decisions on therapy in clinical practice and in the FIGO classification of stage I ovarian cancer. Rupture should be avoided during primary surgery of malignant ovarian tumours confined to the ovaries.

Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study #111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen as the new "standard," a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial. METHODS: This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG #111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3-hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan-Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The overall clinical response rate was 59% in the paclitaxel group and 45% in the cyclophosphamide group; the complete clinical remission rates were 41% and 27%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P =.01 for both). At a median follow-up of 38.5 months and despite a high rate of crossover (48%) from the cyclophosphamide arm to the paclitaxel arm at first detection of progression of disease, a longer progression-free survival (log-rank P =.0005; median of 15.5 months versus 11.5 months) and a longer overall survival (log-rank P =. 0016; median of 35.6 months versus 25.8 months) were seen in the paclitaxel regimen compared with the cyclophosphamide regimen. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong and confirmatory evidence from two large randomized phase III trials to support paclitaxel-cisplatin as the new standard regimen for treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

How long should first-line chemotherapy continue?

Documentation for the optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer is limited. Three randomised trials have compared 5-6 cycles with 8, 10 and 12 cycles respectively. None of the studies showed benefit of chemotherapy beyond 6 cycles. At the moment the standard number of cycles therefore must be 6 cycles. However, these data are based on platinum poly-chemotherapy regimens without taxanes. It may be that the optimal number of cycles is different when using taxanes regimens. It is not possible to tell from the literature if there is a relationship between the number of cycles and response or between the cumulative dose and response. At the moment no trial has shown any benefit of high-dose intensity chemotherapy administered over a short time compared with standard dose chemotherapy administered over a longer period.

Use of tumour markers in monitoring the course of ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to delineate how the best available serum marker for ovarian cancer, CA 125 should be used in monitoring the treatment of individual patients, and in clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The situations where measurement of CA 125 could alter the management of individual patients during therapy and at relapse were critically analysed. Precise definitions for response according to CA 125 were first developed and tested on 989 patients receiving first line therapy and have since been tested on over 2000 patients in phase 2 trials. Precise definitions for progression were developed from 71 patients during and on 255 patients both during and after initial chemotherapy. RESULTS: In individual patient management, progression on initial chemotherapy can be demonstrated by serial rise in CA 125 suggesting the need for a change in therapy. A confirmed doubling of CA 125 from the upper limit of normal during follow up accurately predicts relapse. This endpoint needs prospective testing for use in clinical trials. Precise definitions of response based on a 50% or 75% fall in CA 125 levels accurately predicts whether a cytotoxic agent is active against ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Precise definitions of response based on CA 125 should be used in phase 2 trials of new cytotoxic drugs.

Intergroup collaboration in ovarian cancer: a giant step forward.

The rather slow evolution of so-called "optimal chemotherapy" for ovarian cancer is the result of suboptimal randomised clinical trials, not having the statistical power to identify truly superior regimens, and of the lack of systematic comparisons of new agents with relevant control arms. There is little doubt that we need international collaboration to move the field forward in a timely and coherent manner. European and transatlantic collaboration represents the beginning of the process and point to the success that can await us if the drive to work together remains strong. A similar organisation as for breast cancer (Breast International Group, BIG) needs to be established for ovarian cancer.

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1998 consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: During an international workshop held in September 1998, a group of specialists in the field of ovarian cancer reached consensus on a number of issues with implications for standard practice and for research of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Five groups of experts considered several issues which included: biologic factors, prognostic factors, surgery, initial chemotherapy, second-line treatment, the use of CA 125, investigational drugs, intra-peritoneal treatment and high-dose chemotherapy. The group attempted to arrive at answers to questions such as: Are there prognostic factors, which help to identify patients who will not do well with current therapy? What is the current best therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma? What directions should research take in advanced ovarian cancer? These issues were discussed in a plenary meeting. RESULTS: One of the major conclusions drawn by the consensus committee was that in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer, cisplatin plus paclitaxel has been shown to be superior to previous standard therapy with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide (level I evidence). However, for many patients, carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a reasonable alternative because of toxicity and convenience considerations. Most participants felt that the benefits in terms of toxicity for the paclitaxel-carboplatin are such that its widespread adoption at this stage is justified. Until mature survival data are available a minority of investigators would recommend continued use of cisplatin plus paclitaxel, specifically for those patients with advanced disease with the best prognostic characteristics. For future clinical research in this area, new end points for randomised clinical trials, together with a new Trials Network, are proposed.

Long-term results from a phase II study of single agent paclitaxel (Taxol) in previously platinum treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer: the Nordic experience.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the wide spread perception of a possible benefit from paclitaxel in the second-line situation the Nordic Gynecologic Oncology Group (NGOG) conducted two prospective phase II studies of paclitaxel single agent treatment (175 mg/m2, three-hour i.v. infusion with standard pre-medication every third week) in patients with relapsing or progressing epithelial ovarian cancer following platinum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992-1994 138 patients in total were enrolled of whom 136 received paclitaxel and were included in the toxicity and survival analysis, while 112 were evaluable for response. RESULTS: The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 28% with 16 patients achieving a CR (14%). The estimated median (range) time to progression was 4.1 (0.7-60.7) months. The projected four-year overall survival was 7%, with a median (range) of 9.6 (0.3-60.7) months. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that platinum resistance, and WHO performance status at baseline, independently correlated with survival at all three time points (median survival time 9.6, 18, and 24 months). Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and WHO performance status 0 had a median survival of 25.6 months compared to 7.0 months for the rest of the patients (P < or = 0.0001). No serious toxicity was registered. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel could safely be administered in an outpatient setting using this schedule. Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and a good performance status were most likely to survive. However, these patients are also most likely to respond to re-treatment with a platinum compound. With reference to the reasonably good tumor control and limited toxicity observed in this study, we conclude that paclitaxel single agent therapy is a viable option in the salvage situation, which in some patients can give long-lasting responses. However, although responses can be induced in a significant number of patients, the survival figures remain poor.

[Patients with early stages of endometrial cancer should be spared adjuvant radiotherapy. Danish Endometrial Cancer Group]. / Patienter med tidlige stadier af endometriecancer bør skånes for adjuverende strålebehandling.

In an attempt to create uniform nationwide guidelines for the management of all stages of endometrial carcinoma, and to limit the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in stage I disease to high-risk patients only, a protocol was developed by the Danish Endometrial Cancer group (DEMCA). From September 1986 through August 1988, 1214 women in Denmark with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the endometrium have been treated according to this protocol. This figure represents all endometrial carcinomas diagnosed in Denmark during this two-year period. The primary treatment was total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, no preoperative radiation therapy was delivered. In 1039 cases no macroscopic residual tumour and/or microscopic tumor tissue in the resection margins was found following surgery. Based on surgery and histopathology, these patients were classified as: P-stage I low risk (n = 641), P-stage I high risk (n = 235), P-stage II (n = 105) and P-stage III, Group 1 (n = 58). No postoperative radiation therapy was given to P-I low risk cases. P-I high risk, P-II, and P-III (Group 1) cases received external radiation therapy. Recurrence rate at 68-92 months follow-up was 45/641 (7%) in P-I low risk, 36/235 (15%) in P-I high risk, 30/105 (29%) in P-II, and 27/58 (47%) in P-III (Group 1) cases. Fifteen of 17 vaginal recurrences in P-I low risk cases were salvaged (mean observation time 61 months). In this population-based investigation it has been shown that P-stage low-risk patients are adequately treated by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and that no pre- or postoperative radiation therapy is necessary.

Dose-effect study of carboplatin in ovarian cancer: a Danish Ovarian Cancer Group study.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the effect of a doubled carboplatin dose-intensity in epithelial ovarian cancer in combination with a fixed dose of cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 222 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer stages II to IV were included in the study. Following surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin at an area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of 4 (AUC4) or carboplatin at an AUC of 8 (AUC8) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 given every 4 weeks for six courses. The AUC was calculated according to Calvert's formula. In 123 patients, the carboplatin AUC was also measured based on a single-sample method and the results were compared with the calculated AUC. The end points of the trial were complete pathologic remission (CPR) and crude survival. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of patients in both arms underwent second-look surgery. The frequency of CPR was 32% and 30%, respectively. The survival curves showed no significant difference (P = .84). The dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide was almost identical in the two arms, whereas that of carboplatin was different. In the AUC8 arm, the dose-intensity was 1.86 times that of the AUC4 arm. The results also demonstrated good agreement between the calculated and the measured AUC in most patients. Bone marrow toxicity was significantly higher in the AUC8 arm. CONCLUSION: A doubling of the carboplatin dose-intensity did not result in any significant improvement of pathologic remission or survival. Calvert's formula can be used to give a fairly accurate estimate of the carboplatin AUC. Bone marrow toxicity increased with higher dose-intensity, and a further increase of dose is only feasible with growth-factor or stem-cell support.

A phase 2 study with epirubicin as second-line treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Thirty-six patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer received epirubicin as second-line therapy after primary treatment with carboplatin and cyclophosphamide. Thirty-four patients were evaluatable for response, 36 for toxicity. There were 9 responses (response rate 26.4%, 95% CI = 12.9-44.4), 2 complete and 7 partial. Median duration of response was 149 days (range 42-183); 4 patients with partial remission are still on study. Toxicity consisted of fatal cardiac failure and paravenous injection (1 patient), fatal leukopenia and sepsis (1 patient), and severe loss of appetite, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and general malaise in 3 patients. Platelet nadir grade 4 (WHO) was observed in 2 patients while leukocyte nadir grade 4 was seen in 3 patients. The present study showed a high response rate from standard-dose epirubicin. Toxicity was acceptable in most patients, but 2 patients died from treatment complications which gives a treatment-related mortality rate of 6%. Response was primarily seen in patients with minor tumor load and in good general condition.

[Was chemotherapy beneficial for the patients with advanced ovarian cancer? A comparison of survival and resource use in two different time periods]. / Har kemoterapi gavnet patienter med avanceret ovariecancer? En sammenligning of overlevelse og ressourceforbrug i to forskellige tidsperioder.

Around 1980, aggressive surgery and combination-chemotherapy were introduced as routine therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. It is interesting to evaluate whether this has been associated with an improvement of survival. A comparison between patients diagnosed in the county of Funen during the period April 1973 to April 1978 with patients diagnosed during the period September 1981 to September 1986 was made. In the last period the patients were treated according to the DACOVA guidelines (Damish Cancer of the Ovaries). An improvement in median survival but not in five-year survival was registered. The number of hospital bed-days during the two periods was calculated. In the second period the number of hospital bed-days was seven days higher per patient than in the first period. The cost per gained year of life was 240,000 Dkr. in 1992 prices.