ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare mandibular morphology and spatial position in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at two different cleft centers (Hannover and Brussels) following different surgical treatment protocols. PATIENTS: A total of 62 Caucasian children (40 boys, 22 girls) with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were evaluated by means of conventional cephalometric analysis at approximately the age of 10 years. Data of both cleft groups were compared with a control, noncleft group (n = 40) matched according to age and sex. INTERVENTIONS: The Hannover children with cleft (n = 36) underwent lip repair at a mean age of 5.83 +/- 1.16 months. The hard and soft palates were closed at a mean age of 29.08 +/- 4.68 and 32.25 +/- 4.29 months, respectively. The Brussels children with cleft (n = 26) were treated according to the Malek surgical protocol with soft palate repair at a mean age of 3.04 +/- 0.20 months and simultaneous lip and hard palate repair at a mean age of 6.15 +/- 0.68 months. RESULTS: Statistical analysis (analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey's test) showed a significant (p =.001) smaller mandibular ramus length (Co-Go) in the Brussels cleft group, compared with the control group. The Hannover-Brussels comparison data revealed that the S-N-B angle was significantly (p =.047) less in the Brussels cleft group. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of surgical procedures in patients with UCLP might not be restricted to the maxilla but could influence mandibular spatial position to the cranial base. Because of these positional changes of the mandible, both cleft groups showed facial balance.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate/pathology , Mandible/pathology , Maxillofacial Development , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Cephalometry , Child , Cleft Lip/pathology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Skull Base/pathology , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
In previous intercenter studies on craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, probable surgical-induced changes in mandibular morphology and spatial position related to posterior vertical maxillary morphology were identified by our group. These changes could not be detected in other cephalometric cleft studies because posterior vertical maxillary height and vertical mandibular ramus length were not measured simultaneously. This study presents a modified digital lateral cephalometric hard and soft tissue analysis (Onyx Ceph software, version 2.5.6.; Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany) to evaluate craniofacial morphology and growth patterns in patients with clefts. Forty controls without clefts were used to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and validity of this analysis for future cleft research. Measurement error according to the method of Bland and Altman was less than 1.00 degrees and 1.00 mm, whereas squared correlation coefficients (r) according to the method of Sackett et al showed a high reliability. Method comparison tests according to the method of Bland and Altman clearly showed that the modified digital cephalometric analysis ("test") was valid for future cleft research compared with the "gold standard" (conventional cephalometry).
Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Cleft Lip/pathology , Cleft Palate/pathology , Facial Bones/pathology , Skull/pathology , Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cleft Lip/physiopathology , Cleft Palate/physiopathology , Facial Bones/growth & development , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/pathology , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Reproducibility of Results , Skull/growth & development , Vertical DimensionABSTRACT
Patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) can present with an asymmetric transversal deficiency caused by collapse of the lateral maxillary segment at the cleft side. The surgical technique and orthodontic implications of segmental unilateral transpalatal distraction (TPD) after a posterior maxillary subapical osteotomy using the transpalatal distractor (TPD(R)) are described. The differences between unilateral posterior surgical-assisted rapid palatal expansion (SA-RPE) and segmental unilateral TPD are discussed. The proposed orthodontic-surgical treatment strategy certainly has to be validated by long-term studies in the future.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Cleft Lip/surgery , Humans , Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation , Palate/surgeryABSTRACT
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The craniofacial morphology of 10-year-old male (n = 23) and female (n = 13) patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate was evaluated by means of cephalometric analysis. The control group comprised 40 non-orthodontically treated non-cleft patients from the same population (20 boys, 20 girls) with neutroclusion, matched according to age and gender. Furthermore the results of the cephalometric analysis were compared with those of other cleft centers. Primary rehabilitation of all patients was performed according to a uniform concept at Hanover Medical School. All cephalometric radiographs were analyzed according to Ross [26]. This analysis permitted comparison with the results of two different cleft centers covering 107 patients, published by Ross. RESULTS: In comparison with the control group, both boys and girls with unilateral cleft lip and palate showed a significant retrusion and clockwise rotation of the mandible as well as a decreased vertical midfacial development.
