Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment.

BACKGROUND: Studies from several countries have documented gender disparities in the management of coronary artery disease. Whether such gender disparities are seen in Italy and, if so, whether they can be explained by factors such as age and severity of illness were investigated. METHODS: 77 974 Piedmontese patients, admitted between 1999 and 2002, with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction (ICD 410), angina (ICD 413), chronic ischaemia (ICD 414) and chest pain (ICD 786.5) were studied. The number of men and women undergoing surgical treatment was extracted and the male-female odds ratios calculated. Several risk factors and a risk adjustment technique (APR-DRG) were used to control for possible confounders. Backward stepwise multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for significant covariates. RESULTS: Crude analysis demonstrated that gender is a discriminating factor in the probability of surgery (OR 2.11, 95% CI 2.04 to 2.19), with similar findings among those with each main diagnosis. The odds ratios decreased after adjustment for age, co-morbidity and disease severity but remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women admitted to hospitals in a region of northern Italy with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease are treated differently and this cannot be explained by age or severity of disease.

Appropriateness of early breast cancer management in relation to patient and hospital characteristics: a population based study in Northern Italy.

Administrative data may provide valuable information for monitoring the quality of care at population level and offer an efficient way of gathering data on individual patterns of care, and also to shed light on inequalities in access to appropriate medical care. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of patient and hospital characteristics in the initial treatment of early breast cancer using administrative data. Incident breast cancer patients were identified from hospital discharge records and linked to the radiotherapy outpatient database during 2000-2004 in the Piedmont region of Northwestern Italy. Women treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT) were compared to those treated with BCS without radiotherapy (BCS w/o RT) or mastectomy using multinomial logistic regression models. Out of 16,022 incident cases, 46.2% received BCS + RT, 20.3% received BCS w/o RT, and 33.5% received a mastectomy. Compared to BCS + RT, the factors associated with BCS w/o RT were: increased age (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.29-1.85, for ages 70-79 vs. <50), being unmarried (1.24; 1.13-1.36), presence of co-morbidities (1.32; 1.10-1.58), being treated at hospitals with low surgical volume (1.31; 1.07-1.60 for hospitals with less than 50 vs. > or =150 interventions/year), and living far from radiotherapy facilities (1.75; 1.39-2.20 for those at a distance of >45 min). These same factors were also associated with mastectomy. During the 5-year period observed, there was a trend of reduced probability of receiving a mastectomy (0.70; 0.56-0.88 for 2004 vs. 2000). The presence or absence of nodal involvement was positively associated with mastectomy (2.28; 1.83-2.85) and negatively associated with BCS w/o RT (0.65; 0.56-0.76). After adjustment for potential confounders, education level did not show any association with the type of treatment. Social and geographical factors, in addition to hospital specialization, should be considered to reduce inappropriateness of care for breast cancer.

Multidimensional geriatric assessment in treatment decision in elderly cancer patients: 6-year experience in an outpatient geriatric oncology service.

This prospective cohort study of consecutive elderly cancer patients was undertaken to evaluate the role of the multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA) as an aid in treatment decision-making. A total of 571 cancer patients (aged > or =70) were enrolled during 6-year (1999-2005). All underwent MGA as part of the first evaluation. In multivariate analysis, the probability of receiving active, instead of palliative, treatment was negatively associated with increasing age (odds ratio=0.69 every 5 years, p=0.005), living alone (OR=0.54, p=0.031), dependence in activities of daily living (ADL score >0, OR=0.41, p=0.003) and a low body-mass index (BMI) (OR=0.51, p=0.061); while a positive association emerged for instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score (OR=1.12 per point, p=0.019). Our data suggest that MGA, in addition to age, is a useful tool in clinical practice for deciding cancer treatment in elderly patients, with a major independent role played by living alone, ADL, IADL and BMI.

Opinions concerning euthanasia, life-sustaining treatment and acceleration of death: results of an Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) survey.

BACKGROUND: Advance directives, acceleration of death, euthanasia and 'life-sustaining treatment' have sparked much heated debate among the media, the public, doctors and political leaders. We evaluate the personal opinions of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) members. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 30-item questionnaire was developed and delivered to all 1,832 AIOM members. RESULTS: Six-hundred and eighty-five (37%) oncologists completed and returned the questionnaires. Sixty-three per cent felt culturally and psychologically prepared to face these issues. Fifty-four per cent believed that what had been decided while the patient enjoyed good health is no longer applicable in an advanced state of terminal illness. Thirty-nine per cent believed that doctors should abide by these directives, while 49% believed that this should be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Fourteen per cent of oncologists were favourable towards euthanasia and 42% only in particular circumstances. Fifty-six per cent had received at least one request for accelerating death: 15% consented, 50% discussed it with the patient and 31% refused. CONCLUSION: Advance directives, euthanasia, accelerated death and life-sustaining treatment represent considerable challenges for Italian oncologists. Although prepared to face these issues, AIOM members ask for a debate within the medical world and for a shared judicial regulation.

The MERITO Study: a multicentre trial of the analgesic effect and tolerability of normal-release oral morphine during 'titration phase' in patients with cancer pain.

Adequate and rapid pain control is one of the main goals of cancer pain treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the effect and tolerability of oral normal-release morphine during the initial phase of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain. Consecutive patients naïve to strong opioids received normal-release morphine 5 or 10 mg every 4 h during the titration phase (first 5 days), depending on previous analgesic therapy. Pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), and data were recorded in a patient-compiled diary. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time with pain control (a reduction of at least 50% with respect to the baseline pain score) during the titration phase. A total of 159 consecutive patients (102 men; mean age 65 years) with cancer-related pain were enrolled. Pain control was observed for 75% (95% CI 70-80) of the follow-up period in the intent-to-treat population. Overall, 50% and 75% of patients achieved pain control within 8 and 24 h after starting normal-release morphine therapy respectively. The mean pain score was 7.63 points at baseline, and decreased to 2.43 and 1.67 points (both P<0.001) at days 3 and 5 respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence (24% of patients), constipation (22%), vomiting (13%), nausea (10%) and confusion (7%). Normal-release morphine results in rapid and satisfactory pain control, and is well tolerated, during the strong-opioid titration phase in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A phase II study was carried out to investigate an induction regimen with cisplatin, paclitaxel followed by radiotherapy concurrent with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage III-IV disease patients were eligible. Two cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) courses were administered every 21 days followed by standard fractionated external beam radiotherapy (approximately 70 Gy), concomitant to weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled: over 70% had unresectable disease with bulky lesions. Grade 3-4 neutropenia developed in 14% and G3 mucositis in 23%. Locoregional control was achieved in 51%. Median time to progression and overall survival were 10,7 and 17 months respectively; 2- and 3-year survival rates were 30% and 25% respectively. CONCLUSION: Our induction two-drug regimen followed by chemoradiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin was well tolerated with low acute toxicity and good locoregional control and survival rate.

Involvement of PPARs in Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Human Colon Cancer Specimens and in Normal and Cancer Cell Lines.

PPAR involvement in cell growth was investigated "in vivo" and "in vitro" and was correlated with cell proliferation and apoptotic death. "In vivo" PPARgamma and alpha were evaluated in colon cancer specimens and adjacent nonneoplastic colonic mucosa. PPARgamma increased in most cancer specimens versus mucosa, with a decrease in c-Myc and in PCNA proteins, suggesting that colon cancer growth is due to increased cell survival rather than increased proliferation. The prevalence of survival over proliferation was confirmed by Bcl-2 or Bcl-X(L) increase in cancer versus mucosa, and by decreased PPARalpha. "In vitro" PPARgamma and PPARalpha were evaluated in human tumor and normal cell lines, treated with natural or synthetic ligands. PPARgamma was involved in inhibiting cell proliferation with a decrease in c-Myc protein, whereas PPARalpha was involved in inducing apoptosis with modulation of Bcl-2 and Bad proteins. This involvement was confirmed using specific antagonists of two PPARs. Moreover, the results obtained on treating cell lines with PPAR ligands confirm observations in colon cancer: there is an inverse correlation between PPARalpha and Bcl-2 and between PPARgamma and c-Myc.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial.

Oral capecitabine (Xeloda) is an effective drug with favourable safety in adjuvant and metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin-based therapy is becoming standard for Dukes' C colon cancer in patients suitable for combination therapy, but is not yet approved by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the adjuvant setting. Adjuvant capecitabine is at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), with significant superiority in relapse-free survival and a trend towards improved disease-free and overall survival. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant capecitabine from payer (UK National Health Service (NHS)) and societal perspectives. We used clinical trial data and published sources to estimate incremental direct and societal costs and gains in quality-adjusted life months (QALMs). Acquisition costs were higher for capecitabine than 5-FU/LV, but higher 5-FU/LV administration costs resulted in 57% lower chemotherapy costs for capecitabine. Capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV-associated adverse events required fewer medications and hospitalisations (cost savings pound3653). Societal costs, including patient travel/time costs, were reduced by >75% with capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV (cost savings pound1318), with lifetime gain in QALMs of 9 months. Medical resource utilisation is significantly decreased with capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV, with cost savings to the NHS and society. Capecitabine is also projected to increase life expectancy vs 5-FU/LV. Cost savings and better outcomes make capecitabine a preferred adjuvant therapy for Dukes' C colon cancer. This pharmacoeconomic analysis strongly supports replacing 5-FU/LV with capecitabine in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in the UK.

Weekly cisplatin plus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer patients heavily pretreated with both anthracycline and taxanes.

BACKGROUND: Treating patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer is challenging. This study evaluated the activity and safety of a combination of cisplatin and capecitabine in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients entered the study. All had experienced failures or relapse after previous treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes plus/minus other chemotherapeutic regimens. The present treatment consisted of intravenous cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) every week for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, and oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. RESULTS: Objective response was obtained in 14 patients (35.9%), with complete remission in 3 (7.7%). Median time to progression was 5.2 months and survival was 10.9 months in the entire population and 8.7 and 16.5 months in the responding patients, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity for the regimen was leucopenia, while gastrointestinal discomfort was the most frequent cause of capecitabine reduction or delay. CONCLUSIONS: The cisplatin and capecitabine combination regimen is active and manageable. It seems to be non-cross resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes.

Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to compare two vinorelbine-based doublets with carboplatin (CBDCA-VC) or with gemcitabine (VG) in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 316 patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated were randomized to either vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) D1,8 with carboplatin AUC 5 D1 (VC) or vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) with gemcitabine (VG) 1000 mg/m(2) both given D1,8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate with secondary parameters being survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance and clinical benefit. RESULTS: The median number of cycles was four in each arm with a total of 1268 cycles. The objective response (OR) on intent-to-treat was 20.8% in VC and 28% in VG (p=0.15). Median PFS was 3.9 months in VC and 4.4 months (mo) in VG (p=0.18). Median survival was significantly longer (p=0.01) for VG with 11.5 mo compared to 8.6 mo in VC with 1 year survival at 48.9 and 34.4%, respectively. Tolerance was better in the VG arm as compared to the VC patients. Four toxic deaths were recorded in the VC group. Clinical benefit response rate was 32.4% compared to 40.9% in 111 and 110 evaluable patients in VC and VG, respectively. CONCLUSION: VG compared to VC resulted in a similar overall response rate, favourable median survival and a better toxicity profile. For non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, VG is a useful alternative.

Paclitaxel, vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines.

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel (PTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion administered as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines. A total of 61 patients received a regimen consisting of VNB 25 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, PTX 60 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and continuous infusion of 5-FU at 200 mg m(-2) every day. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Disease response was evaluated by both RECIST and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Objective responses were recorded in 39 of 61 patients (64.0%) assessed by WHO and in 36 of 50 patients (72.0%) assessable by RECIST criteria. Complete remission occurred in 15 (24.6%) and 14 patients (28.0%), respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival of entire population was 10.6 and 27.3 months, respectively, and median duration of complete response was 14.8 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3/4 in 52.5% of patients). Grade 3/4 nonhaematologic toxicities included mucositis/diarrhoea in 13.1%, skin in 3.3% and cardiac in 1.6% of patients. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in five patients (7.2%). The VNB, PTX and 5-FU continuous infusion combination regimen was active and manageable. Complete responses were frequent and durable.

Weekly cisplatin paclitaxel and continuous infusion fluorouracil in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin, paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have demonstrated significant activity in patients with advanced squamous head and neck cancer (HNSCC) despite relevant toxicity. A weekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel with continuous infusion of 5-FU could offer a better toxicity profile without affecting dose intensity or treatment outcome. We evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly cisplatin/paclitaxel with continuous infusion 5-FU in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. METHODS: A total of 44 patients were studied. Treatment consisted of two 6-week cycles with weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and daily continuous infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m2 from day 1 to 42. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response. RESULTS: 40 out of 44 patients were evaluable for response. After two cycles we observed seven complete responses (16%) and 12 partial responses (27%), with a 43% (95% CI 28-58%) overall response rate. Stable disease was seen in 13 patients (29%) and progressive disease in 12 patients (27%). Toxicity was mild in treated patients: we observed less than 10% of grade 3/4 hematological and gastroenteric toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: A weekly schedule of cisplatin and paclitaxel associated with continuous infusion 5-FU showed low toxicity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC while significant activity was conserved.

Phase II study of cisplatin, gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the activity of the combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as therapy for metastatic or locally advanced inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received first-line chemotherapy comprising cisplatin (20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29 and 36) and 5-FU (200 mg/m2 as continuous infusion on days 1-42) every 56 days. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were studied. Eighty courses were administered (median two courses per patient). Among 32 patients evaluable for response, two patients had a complete response and four a partial response for an overall response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval 7% to 36%). Thirteen patients had stable disease (40%) and 13 progressed. Median progression-free survival was 4.7 months, median survival 9.0 months and 26% of patients achieved 1-year survival. Ten of 25 patients (40%) with pain at presentation had a sustained reduction of analgesic consumption. The principal grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and mucositis, occurring in 24%, 21%, 9% and 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: This schedule seems well tolerated and active in pancreatic cancer and worthwhile of further evaluation.

Paclitaxel administration on days 1 and 8 every 21 days in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. A multicenter phase II trial.

Paclitaxel is now included in second- and even first-line regimens in advanced breast cancer. The optimal dose and schedule of this drug, however, still remain a matter of investigation. A group of 57 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-containing regimens were submitted to treatment with single-agent paclitaxel administered at 130 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Of the 57 patients, 56 were fully evaluable, and of these 25 had an absolute anthracycline resistance, 14 a relative resistance and 17 were potentially sensitive. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 33-71 years), their median performance status was 1 (0-3), and 27 (47%) had liver involvement, 17 (30%) lung involvement, 30 (53%) bone involvement and 15 (26%) skin/lymph node involvement. Toxicity was recorded in 295 cycles. This scheme was well tolerated, the dose-limiting toxicities being hematological and neurological. Grade 3/4 leukopenia was observed in 20% of patients at nadir, while grade 3 leukopenia was observed in 3% of patients at recycle. Only one patient experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in 26% of patients, leading to drug withdrawal in three. The treatment was given on an outpatient basis in all patients and the median relative dose intensity of 86.6 mg/m2 per week was 100% of the planned dose (range 75-100%). Three patients (5%) attained a complete clinical response and 12 (21%) a partial response for an overall response rate of 26% (95% confidence interval 18-38%), while 30 (53%) attained disease stabilization and 11 progressed (19%). Time to progression in responding patients was 10.3 months, and the median overall survival of the entire population was 15.4 months. To conclude, paclitaxel administration on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was active and manageable in advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines. The response obtained was durable.

Quality of life studies and genito-urinary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary (GU) tumors represent a large proportion of solid cancers (1 of 4) and a wide variety of natural histories, based on various prognostic factors and resulting in different treatment options and end points. In some cases, for the same stage of disease, different treatment strategies do not impact differently on overall survival (OS): surgery vs. radiation, or radical vs. conservative multidisciplinary approach, adjuvant or neoadjuvant, chemotherapy vs. BSC. Quality of life (QoL) is considered a reasonable end point when differences in OS do not seem to be striking. DESIGN: A review of the literature on different disease stages was undertaken to show where and when QoL was used as the end point of treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Very few studies have been performed in prostate, bladder and testicular cancer to show the impact of different treatment approaches on QoL. Although these studies might be considered as non-conclusive, some data may allow a better choice for the patients. CONCLUSIONS: QoL as the principal end point has not been used in clinical trials of GU tumors comparing different treatment approaches. This makes the choice between treatments offering similar survival but different toxicity patterns, body and behavioral consequences more difficult. We suggest that future prospective randomized studies should be planned taking into account the QoL as the main end point.

Low dose adriamycin and ifosfamide in the treatment of advanced adult soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are infrequent tumors (up to 1% of all neoplasms) in adult patients. Treatment of advanced disease is largely unsatisfactory. Only a few drugs are active agents and combination regimens offer limited and short-lived activity. High dose chemotherapy may be administered only to limited groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated, in a phase II study, the adriamycin and ifosfamide combination regimen. The drugs were administered at 60 mg/sqm and 6 g/sqm dosage, respectively. The total number of treated patients was 42 of which 40 were evaluable. RESULTS: We observed 6 complete responses (14% response rate) and 6 partial responses (14%). The mean survival was 6 months (median 7.6 months). Toxicity was limited and reversible. CONCLUSION: While high dose chemotherapy may be reserved for selected groups of patients, an adriamycin and ifosfamide combination regimen at conventional doses can be administered to the great majority of patients with suboptimal performance status or with advanced age.

Vinorelbine treatment of recurrent salivary gland carcinomas.

Twenty patients (13 males, 7 females, median age 61 years, range 27-74) with recurrent adenocarcinoma-like tumors of major (10 patients) and minor (10 patients) salivary gland origin (13 adenoid cystic carcinoma, 5 adenocarcinoma, 1 malignant mixed tumor, 1 undifferentiated carcinoma) were treated with vinorelbine at the dose of 30 mg/m2 i.v. weekly. Sixteen patients had been previously treated with surgery + radiation, 3 with surgery + radiotherapy + Novantrone and 1 with radiotherapy alone. Nine patients had local recurrence, 2 local relapse + metastasis and 9 metastasis alone. Site of metastases are: lung (7), bone (1), lung + bone (2), lung + bone + lymph-node + skin (1). Overall 174 courses were given (median 9, range 6-19). Responses were: PR in 4 patients (20%) with a median duration of 6 months (3-9), 9 NC (45%) with a median duration of 3.5 months and 7 PD (35%). The median survival time was 10 months for PR/NC patients, 4 months for non-responders. Median overall survival was 7 months. Vinorelbine has a moderate activity in these very advanced cases.

Randomized comparison of goserelin acetate versus mitomycin C plus goserelin acetate in previously untreated prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

In a prospective trial conducted by the Gruppo Onco Urologico Piemontese, newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients with bone metastases were randomized to receive goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or goserelin plus mitomycin at 14 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks. Treatment was planned to be continued until progression. The study was interrupted because of inadequate accrual rate when 63 patients had been recruited. A long-term follow-up (median, 47 months), performed to counterbalance the limited number of patients included, revealed no difference in time to progression and overall survival between the study treatments. However, 56.5% of assessable patients allocated to the chemotherapy arm presented a > or =90% reduction of prostate-specific antigen levels compared with 36.3% in the goserelin group, and previously elevated levels normalized in 73.9% versus 45.4%. Non-progressing patients received 5-7 cycles of mitomycin C with acceptable toxicity, but the cytotoxic treatment was interrupted early in all cases within the first year due to cumulative myelotoxicity. In conclusion, the results, although inconclusive, fail to support a clear advantage in terms of cost/benefit of chemotherapy plus hormone therapy over hormone treatment alone in advanced prostate cancer with bone involvement.