Active Learning in Psychiatry Education: Current Practices and Future Perspectives.

Over the past few decades, medical education has seen increased interest in the use of active learning formats to engage learners and promote knowledge application over knowledge acquisition. The field of psychiatry, in particular, has pioneered a host of novel active learning paradigms. These have contributed to our understanding of the role of andragogy along the continuum of medical education, from undergraduate to continuing medical education. In an effort to frame the successes and failures of various attempts at integrating active learning into healthcare curricula, a group of educators from the A. B. Baker Section on Neurological Education from the American Academy of Neurology reviewed the state of the field in its partner field of medical neuroscience. Herein we provide a narrative review of the literature, outlining the basis for implementing active learning, the novel formats that have been used, and the lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative analysis of the research that has been done to date. While preparation time seems to present the greatest obstacle to acceptance from learners and educators, there is generally positive reception to the new educational formats. Additionally, most assessments of trainee performance have suggested non-inferiority (if not superiority). However, occasional mixed findings point to a need for better assessments of the type of learning that these new formats engender: knowledge application rather than acquisition. Moreover, this field is relatively nascent and, in order to ascertain how best to integrate active learning into psychiatry education, a framework for quantitative outcome assessments is needed going forward.

Strategic Considerations for Applying the Flipped Classroom to Neurology Education.

Nowadays, the "flipped classroom" approach is taking the center stage within medical education. However, very few reports on the implementation of the flipped classroom in neurology have been published to date, and this educational model still represents a challenge for students and educators alike. In this article, neurology educators from the American Academy of Neurology's A. B. Baker Section on Neurological Education analyze reports of flipped classroom in other medical/surgical subspecialties, review the current implementation in neurology, and discuss future strategies to flip the neurology curriculum through contextualization of the benefits and the consequences. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:4-9.

Education Research: Flipped classroom in neurology: Principles, practices, and perspectives.

How to most effectively deliver a large amount of information in an engaging environment that encourages critical thinking is a question that has long plagued educators. With ever-increasing demands on both resident and faculty time, from shrinking duty hours to increased patient complexity, combined with the exponential growth of medical knowledge and unequal access to the spectrum of neurologic subspecialties around the country, this question has become especially pertinent to neurology residency training. A team of educators from the American Academy of Neurology's A.B. Baker Section on Neurological Education sought to review the current evidence regarding the implementation of the flipped classroom format. This educational model has only recently been applied to health care education along the training continuum, and a small collection of articles has, so far, used disparate methods of curricular implementation and assessment. While the feedback from learners is generally positive, a number of obstacles to implementation exist, most notably learner time commitments. These are presented with discussion of potential solutions along with suggestions for future studies.

Neurologic and neuroscience education: Mitigating neurophobia to mentor health care providers.

Neurologic disorders are among the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Moreover, the current shortfall of neurologists is expected to worsen over the coming decade. As a consequence, many patients with neurologic disorders will be treated by physicians and primary care providers without formal neurologic training. Furthermore, a pervasive and well-described fear of neurology, termed neurophobia, has been identified in medical student cohorts, residents, and among general practitioners. In this article, members of the American Academy of Neurology A.B. Baker Section on Neurological Education review current guidelines regarding neurologic and neuroscience education, contextualize the genesis and the negative consequences of neurophobia, and provide strategies to mitigate it for purposes of mentoring future generations of health care providers.

Hypertension and intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence among white, black, and Hispanic individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether recurrence risk for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is higher among black and Hispanic individuals and whether this disparity is attributable to differences in blood pressure (BP) measurements and their variability. METHODS: We analyzed data from survivors of primary ICH enrolled in 2 separate studies: (1) the longitudinal study conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital (n = 759), and (2) the ERICH (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage) study (n = 1,532). Participants underwent structured interview at enrollment (including self-report of race/ethnicity) and were followed longitudinally via phone calls and review of medical records. We captured systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP measurements, and quantified variability as SBP and diastolic BP variation coefficients. We used multivariable (Cox regression) survival analysis to identify risk factors for ICH recurrence. RESULTS: We followed 2,291 ICH survivors (1,121 white, 529 black, 605 Hispanic, and 36 of other race/ethnicity). Both black and Hispanic patients displayed higher SBP during follow-up (p < 0.05). Black participants also displayed greater SBP variability during follow-up (p = 0.032). In univariable analyses, black and Hispanic patients were at higher ICH recurrence risk (p < 0.05). After adjusting for BP measurements and their variability, both Hispanic (hazard ratio = 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.00, p = 0.004) and black (hazard ratio = 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.36-2.86, p < 0.001) patients remained at higher risk of ICH recurrence. CONCLUSION: Black and Hispanic patients are at higher risk of ICH recurrence; hypertension severity (average BP and its variability) does not fully account for this finding. Additional studies will be required to further elucidate determinants for this health disparity.

Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Paradoxical Embolism Through a Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Paradoxical embolism due to isolated pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is an uncommon cause of ischemic stroke, with the majority occurring in patients who have not yet been diagnosed with their malformation. We report a 32-year-old man who presented with an abrupt onset of right facial weakness and expressive aphasia. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed an acute infarct in the left middle cerebral artery territory and chronic infarcts in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres. A cardioembolic mechanism was initially considered in the setting of perimyocarditis diagnosed a few months earlier. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms revealed high volume right to left shunting, but no septal defects. A pulmonary AVM was confirmed with computed tomography angiography and fistualization was successfully treated with embolization. This report highlights a case of undiagnosed pulmonary AVM leading to recurrent paradoxical emboli to the brain. We review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of pulmonary AVMs in relation to stroke risk.

Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Wake-Up Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

GOAL: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in the treatment of wake-up stroke (WUS) using propensity score (PS) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients meeting inclusion criteria were retrospectively identified from our stroke registry between July 2008 and May 2014, and classified as stroke onset less than or equal to 4.5 hours treated with tPA (control; n = 369), tPA-treated WUS (n = 46), or nontreated WUS (n = 154). The primary outcome of interest for safety was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), defined as parenchymal hemorrhage associated with a greater than or equal to 4-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders and PS for receiving IV tPA assessed outcomes, along with PS-matched average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). FINDINGS: No significant difference was found in rates of sICH between tPA-treated WUS, nontreated WUS, and controls (2.2%, .7%, and 3%, respectively), or in the odds of sICH between tPA-treated WUS and controls (OR = .53, 95% CI = .06-4.60, P = .568). Among WUS patients, tPA treatment was significantly associated with higher odds of good functional outcome in fully adjusted analyses (OR = 7.22, 95% CI = 2.28-22.88, P = .001). The ATT of tPA for WUS patients demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in NIHSS score at discharge when compared to nontreated WUS patients (-4.32 versus -.34, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable rates of sICH between treated WUS and stroke onset less than or equal to 4.5 hours treated with tPA suggest that tPA may be safely used to treat WUS. Superior outcomes for tPA-treated versus nontreated WUS subjects may suggest clinical efficacy of the treatment.