Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Biotechnol Adv ; 30(6): 1318-35, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22333321

ABSTRACT

Genetically modified plants, in the following referred to as genetically modified organisms or GMOs, have been commercially grown for almost two decades. In 2010 approximately 10% of the total global crop acreage was planted with GMOs (James, 2011). More than 30 countries have been growing commercial GMOs, and many more have performed field trials. Although the majority of commercial GMOs both in terms of acreage and specific events belong to the four species: soybean, maize, cotton and rapeseed, there are another 20+ species where GMOs are commercialized or in the pipeline for commercialization. The number of GMOs cultivated in field trials or for commercial production has constantly increased during this time period. So have the number of species, the number of countries involved, the diversity of novel (added) genetic elements and the global trade. All of these factors contribute to the increasing complexity of detecting and correctly identifying GMO derived material. Many jurisdictions, including the European Union (EU), legally distinguish between authorized (and therefore legal) and un-authorized (and therefore illegal) GMOs. Information about the developments, field trials, authorizations, cultivation, trade and observations made in the official GMO control laboratories in different countries around the world is often limited, despite several attempts such as the OECD BioTrack for voluntary dissemination of data. This lack of information inevitably makes it challenging to detect and identify GMOs, especially the un-authorized GMOs. The present paper reviews the state of the art technologies and approaches in light of coverage, practicability, sensitivity and limitations. Emphasis is put on exemplifying practical detection of un-authorized GMOs. Although this paper has a European (EU) bias when examples are given, the contents have global relevance.


Subject(s)
Plants, Genetically Modified/growth & development , Social Control, Formal , Genetic Techniques , Genetic Testing , Plants, Genetically Modified/classification , Reference Standards , Transformation, Genetic
2.
J AOAC Int ; 93(3): 1046-56, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20629412

ABSTRACT

A method is presented for estimating the size of uncertainty associated with the measurement of products derived from genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The method is based on the uncertainty profile, which is an extension, for the estimation of uncertainty, of a recent graphical statistical tool called an accuracy profile that was developed for the validation of quantitative analytical methods. The application of uncertainty profiles as an aid to decision making and assessment of fitness for purpose is also presented. Results of the measurement of the quantity of GMOs in flour by PCR-based methods collected through a number of interlaboratory studies followed the log-normal distribution. Uncertainty profiles built using the results generally give an expected range for measurement results of 50-200% of reference concentrations for materials that contain at least 1% GMO. This range is consistent with European Network of GM Laboratories and the European Union (EU) Community Reference Laboratory validation criteria and can be used as a fitness for purpose criterion for measurement methods. The effect on the enforcement of EU labeling regulations is that, in general, an individual analytical result needs to be < 0.45% to demonstrate compliance, and > 1.8% to demonstrate noncompliance with a labeling threshold of 0.9%.


Subject(s)
Glycine max/genetics , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Uncertainty , Zea mays/genetics
3.
Environ Biosafety Res ; 7(4): 197-218, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19081008

ABSTRACT

The combination or stacking of different traits or genes in plants is rapidly gaining popularity in biotech crop production. Here we review the existing terminology regarding gene stacking in plants, and its implications in relation to genetics, biosafety, detectability and European regulations. Different methods of production of stacked gene traits, as well as the status of their cultivation and approval, are reviewed. Related to the different techniques of transformation and production, including classical breeding, and to differences in global authorization and commercialization practices, there are many types, definitions, and perceptions of stacking. These include: (1) stacking of traits and (2) stacking of events, which are the most widely accepted perceptions of stacking, and (3) stacking of genes, which from the analytical and traceability point of view may be a more appropriate perception. These differences in perceptions and definitions are discussed, as are their implications for analytical detection and regulatory compliance according to (in particular) European Union (EU) regulations. A comprehensive terminology regarding gene stacking with regulatory relevance is proposed. The haploid genome equivalent is proposed as the prevailing unit of measurement at all stages throughout the chain, in order to ensure that terminology and definitions of gene stacks are adapted to analytical detection, traceability, and compliance with EU regulations.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/trends , Genetic Engineering/trends , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Transgenes , DNA, Recombinant/analysis , European Union , Genetic Engineering/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Terminology as Topic
4.
J Agric Food Chem ; 56(24): 11596-606, 2008 Dec 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19053386

ABSTRACT

A high-throughput multiplex assay for the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMO) was developed on the basis of the existing SNPlex method designed for SNP genotyping. This SNPlex assay allows the simultaneous detection of up to 48 short DNA sequences (approximately 70 bp; "signature sequences") from taxa endogenous reference genes, from GMO constructions, screening targets, construct-specific, and event-specific targets, and finally from donor organisms. This assay avoids certain shortcomings of multiplex PCR-based methods already in widespread use for GMO detection. The assay demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity. The results suggest that this assay is reliable, flexible, and cost- and time-effective for high-throughput GMO detection.


Subject(s)
Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Plants/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Genotype , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
5.
Anal Biochem ; 376(2): 189-99, 2008 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18346452

ABSTRACT

Detection of nonauthorized genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has always presented an analytical challenge because the complete sequence data needed to detect them are generally unavailable although sequence similarity to known GMOs can be expected. A new approach, differential quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for detection of nonauthorized GMOs is presented here. This method is based on the presence of several common elements (e.g., promoter, genes of interest) in different GMOs. A statistical model was developed to study the difference between the number of molecules of such a common sequence and the number of molecules identifying the approved GMO (as determined by border-fragment-based PCR) and the donor organism of the common sequence. When this difference differs statistically from zero, the presence of a nonauthorized GMO can be inferred. The interest and scope of such an approach were tested on a case study of different proportions of genetically modified maize events, with the P35S promoter as the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus common sequence. The presence of a nonauthorized GMO was successfully detected in the mixtures analyzed and in the presence of (donor organism of P35S promoter). This method could be easily transposed to other common GMO sequences and other species and is applicable to other detection areas such as microbiology.


Subject(s)
Organisms, Genetically Modified/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Zea mays/genetics , Caulimovirus/genetics , DNA, Plant/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics
6.
J Agric Food Chem ; 56(6): 1818-28, 2008 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18303841

ABSTRACT

The labeling of products containing genetically modified organisms (GMO) is linked to their quantification since a threshold for the presence of fortuitous GMOs in food has been established. This threshold is calculated from a combination of two absolute quantification values: one for the specific GMO target and the second for an endogenous reference gene specific to the taxon. Thus, the development of reliable methods to quantify GMOs using endogenous reference genes in complex matrixes such as food and feed is needed. Plant identification can be difficult in the case of closely related taxa, which moreover are subject to introgression events. Based on the homology of beta-fructosidase sequences obtained from public databases, two couples of consensus primers were designed for the detection, quantification, and differentiation of four Solanaceae: potato (Solanum tuberosum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), pepper (Capsicum annuum), and eggplant (Solanum melongena). Sequence variability was studied first using lines and cultivars (intraspecies sequence variability), then using taxa involved in gene introgressions, and finally, using taxonomically close taxa (interspecies sequence variability). This study allowed us to design four highly specific TaqMan-MGB probes. A duplex real time PCR assay was developed for simultaneous quantification of tomato and potato. For eggplant and pepper, only simplex real time PCR tests were developed. The results demonstrated the high specificity and sensitivity of the assays. We therefore conclude that beta-fructosidase can be used as an endogenous reference gene for GMO analysis.


Subject(s)
Capsicum/genetics , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Solanum lycopersicum/genetics , Solanum melongena/genetics , Solanum tuberosum/genetics , Base Sequence , Capsicum/classification , DNA, Plant/analysis , DNA, Plant/chemistry , Solanum lycopersicum/classification , Molecular Sequence Data , Plants, Genetically Modified/classification , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Solanum melongena/classification , Solanum tuberosum/classification , beta-Fructofuranosidase/genetics
7.
J Agric Food Chem ; 55(20): 8003-10, 2007 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17824661

ABSTRACT

In the first part of the paper, we report the description of a new strategy for the development of a plant reference gene system that can be used for genetically modified organism (GMO) analysis. On the basis of in silico research for candidate genes, the design of degenerate primers allowed the obtention of genomic sequences of the selected gene ppi-phosphofructokinase ( ppi-PPF) for nine taxa in which GMOs have been developed. The comparison and the analysis of inter- and intraspecies sequence variability were performed using a large number of species and cultivars. As an example of application following the detection of single nucleotide polymorphism, we designed specific conventional and real-time polymerase chain reaction tests for the detection and quantification of three taxa, namely, maize, cotton, and rice. This system was highly specific and sensitive. The gene copy number conservation among different cultivars was analyzed and confirmed with a sequencing step. This reference gene system is adequate for use in routine assays for the quantification of GMOs. We then explain briefly the constraints faced and propose recommendations when designing a reference gene system depending on the species to be targeted.


Subject(s)
Genes, Plant/genetics , Gossypium/genetics , Oryza/genetics , Phosphotransferases/genetics , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Zea mays/genetics , Breeding , DNA, Plant/analysis , DNA, Plant/chemistry , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Species Specificity
8.
Plant Mol Biol ; 61(1-2): 123-39, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16786296

ABSTRACT

A multiplex DNA microarray chip was developed for simultaneous identification of nine genetically modified organisms (GMOs), five plant species and three GMO screening elements, i.e. the 35S promoter, the nos terminator and the nptII gene. The chips also include several controls, such as that for the possible presence of CaMV. The on-chip detection was performed directly with PCR amplified products. Particular emphasis was placed on the reduction of the number of PCR reactions required and on the number of primers present per amplification tube. The targets were biotin labelled and the arrays were detected using a colorimetric methodology. Specificity was provided by specific capture probes designed for each GMO and for the common screening elements. The sensitivity of the assay was tested by experiments carried out in five different laboratories. The limit of detection was lower than 0.3% GMO for all tests and in general around 0.1% for most GMOs. The chip detection system complies with the requirements of current EU regulations and other countries where thresholds are established for the labelling of GMO.


Subject(s)
Food, Genetically Modified , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genetics , Beta vulgaris/genetics , Brassica rapa/genetics , Caulimovirus/genetics , European Union , Solanum lycopersicum/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Glycine max/genetics , Zea mays/genetics
9.
J AOAC Int ; 88(2): 654-64, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15861534

ABSTRACT

The fate of DNA and protein transgenic sequences in products derived from animals fed transgenic crops has recently raised public interest. Sensitive molecular tests targeting the Bt176 genetic construct and the transgenic Cry1Ab protein were developed to determine whether plant sequences, especially transgenic sequences, are present in animal products. A protocol for total DNA extraction and purification from cow whole blood samples was first drawn up and assessed by spiking with known amounts of DNA from Bt176 maize. The limit of detection for transgenic sequences (35S promoter and Bt176-specific junction sequence) was determined by both the polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) and the 5'-nuclease PCR assay. Four additional PCR systems were built to substantiate the results. The first detects a mono-copy maize-specific sequence (ADH promoter). Two others target multi-copy sequences from plant nucleus (26S rRNA gene) and chloroplast (psaB gene). The last one, used as a positive control, targets a mono-copy animal sequence (alpha(s1)-casein gene). Both methods detected a minimum spiking at 25 copies of Bt176 maize/mL in 10 mL whole blood samples. The sandwich ELISA kit used detected down to 1 ng transgenic Cry1Ab protein/mL spiked whole blood.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/blood , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/blood , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , DNA, Plant/genetics , Endotoxins/blood , Endotoxins/genetics , Food, Genetically Modified , Zea mays/chemistry , Zea mays/genetics , Animals , Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins , Cattle , Cell Nucleus/chemistry , Chloroplasts/chemistry , DNA Primers , DNA, Plant/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Hemolysin Proteins , Plants/chemistry , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
10.
J AOAC Int ; 88(2): 536-46, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15859082

ABSTRACT

T25 is one of the 4 maize transformation events from which commercial lines have so far been authorized in Europe. It was created by polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation using a construct bearing one copy of the synthetic pat gene associated with both promoter and terminator of the 35S ribosomal gene from cauliflower mosaic virus. In this article, we report the sequencing of the whole T25 insert and the characterization of its integration site by using a genome walking strategy. Our results confirmed that one intact copy of the initial construct had been integrated in the plant genome. They also revealed, at the 5' junction of the insert, the presence of a second truncated 35S promoter, probably resulting from rearrangements which may have occurred before or during integration of the plasmid DNA. The analysis of the junction fragments showed that the integration site of the insert presented high homologies with the Huck retrotransposon family. By using one primer annealing in the maize genome and the other in the 5' end of the integrated DNA, we developed a reliable event-specific detection system for T25 maize. To provide means to comply with the European regulation, a real-time PCR test was designed for specific quantitation of T25 event by using Taqman chemistry.


Subject(s)
Food, Genetically Modified , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Zea mays/chemistry , Zea mays/genetics , 3' Flanking Region/genetics , 5' Flanking Region/genetics , Base Sequence , DNA Primers , DNA, Plant/genetics , European Union , Legislation, Food , Molecular Sequence Data , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Seeds/chemistry
11.
J AOAC Int ; 88(2): 547-57, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15859083

ABSTRACT

A highly sensitive quantitative real-time assay targeted on the 35S promoter of a commercial genetically modified organism (GMO) was characterized (sF/sR primers) and developed for an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System and TaqMan chemistry. The specificity assessment and performance criteria of sF/sR assay were compared to other P35S-targeted published assays. sF/sR primers amplified a 79 base pair DNA sequence located in a part of P35S that is highly conserved among many caulimovirus strains, i.e., this consensus part of CaMV P35S is likely to be present in many GM events. According to the experimental conditions, the absolute limit of detection for Bt176 corn was estimated between 0.2 and 2 copies of equivalent genome (CEG). The limit of quantification was reached below 0.1% Bt176 content. A Cauliflower Mosaic Virus control (CaMV) qualitative assay targeted on the ORF III of the viral genome was also used as a control (primers 3F/3R) to assess the presence of CaMV in plant-derived products. The specificity of this test was assessed on various CaMV strains, including the Figwort Mosaic Virus (FMV) and solanaceous CaMV strains. Considering the performance of sF/sR quantification test, the highly conserved sequence, and the small size of the amplicon, this assay was tested in a collaborative study in order to be proposed as an international standard.


Subject(s)
DNA, Plant/genetics , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Zea mays/genetics , DNA Primers , DNA, Plant/chemistry , DNA, Viral/chemistry , DNA, Viral/genetics , Oligonucleotide Probes , Plant Viruses/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Seeds/chemistry , Viruses/chemistry
12.
J AOAC Int ; 88(2): 558-73, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15859084

ABSTRACT

The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the European Network of GMO Working Laboratories have proposed development of a modular strategy for stepwise validation of complex analytical techniques. When applied to the quantitation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food products, the instrumental quantitation step of the technique is separately validated from the DNA extraction step to better control the sources of uncertainty and facilitate the validation of GMO-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory study on the quantitation step of the method standardized by CEN for the detection of a regulatory element commonly inserted in GMO maize-based foods. This is focused on the quantitation of P35S promoter through using the quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR). Fifteen French laboratories participated in the interlaboratory study of the P35S quantitation operating procedure on DNA extract samples using either the thermal cycler ABI Prism 7700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) or Light Cycler (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Attention was focused on DNA extract samples used to calibrate the method and unknown extract samples. Data were processed according to the recommendations of ISO 5725 standard. Performance criteria, obtained using the robust algorithm, were compared to the classic data processing after rejection of outliers by the Cochran and Grubbs tests. Two laboratories were detected as outliers by the Grubbs test. The robust precision criteria gave values between the classical values estimated before and after rejection of the outliers. Using the robust method, the relative expanded uncertainty by the quantitation method is about 20% for a 1% Bt176 content, whereas it can reach 40% for a 0.1% Bt176. The performances of the quantitation assay are relevant to the application of the European regulation, which has an accepted tolerance interval of about +/-50%. These data were fitted to a power model (r2 = 0.96). Thanks to this model, it is possible to propose an estimation of uncertainty of the QRT-PCR quantitation step and an uncertainty budget depending on the analytical conditions.


Subject(s)
DNA, Plant/genetics , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Zea mays/genetics , Algorithms , Calibration , DNA, Plant/chemistry , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Flour/analysis , Models, Statistical , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results
13.
J Agric Food Chem ; 52(15): 4632-7, 2004 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15264892

ABSTRACT

Four real-time polymerase chain reaction systems aiming at the specific detection and quantification of maize DNA are described. They have been developed in four independent laboratories targeting different maize sequences, i.e., alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1), high mobility group protein (hmga), invertase A (ivr1), and zein, respectively. They were all fully specific, showing a very similar quantification accuracy along a number of distantly related maize cultivars and being either single or low copy number genes. They were highly sensitive and exhibited limits of quantification below 100 maize genomic copies. In consequence, they are considered suitable for use as maize specific endogenous reference genes in DNA analyses, including GMO quantitative tests.


Subject(s)
DNA, Plant/analysis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Zea mays/genetics , Alcohol Dehydrogenase/genetics , Base Sequence , High Mobility Group Proteins/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Sensitivity and Specificity , Zein/genetics
14.
J AOAC Int ; 85(3): 801-8, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12083279

ABSTRACT

Detection methods for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are necessary for many applications, from seed purity assessment to compliance of food labeling in several countries. Numerous analytical methods are currently used or under development to support these needs. The currently used methods are bioassays and protein- and DNA-based detection protocols. To avoid discrepancy of results between such largely different methods and, for instance, the potential resulting legal actions, compatibility of the methods is urgently needed. Performance criteria of methods allow evaluation against a common standard. The more-common performance criteria for detection methods are precision, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, which together specifically address other terms used to describe the performance of a method, such as applicability, selectivity, calibration, trueness, precision, recovery, operating range, limit of quantitation, limit of detection, and ruggedness. Performance criteria should provide objective tools to accept or reject specific methods, to validate them, to ensure compatibility between validated methods, and be used on a routine basis to reject data outside an acceptable range of variability. When selecting a method of detection, it is also important to consider its applicability, its field of applications, and its limitations, by including factors such as its ability to detect the target analyte in a given matrix, the duration of the analyses, its cost effectiveness, and the necessary sample sizes for testing. Thus, the current GMO detection methods should be evaluated against a common set of performance criteria.


Subject(s)
Food Analysis/methods , Food, Genetically Modified , Plants, Genetically Modified/genetics , Calibration , DNA, Plant/analysis , Food Analysis/standards , Plant Proteins/analysis , Reference Standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...