Elite vs. Experienced Male and Female Trail Runners: Comparing Running Economy, Biomechanics, Strength, and Power.

ABSTRACT: Besson, T, Pastor, FS, Varesco, G, Berthet, M, Kennouche, D, Dandrieux, P-E, Rossi, J, and Millet, GY. Elite vs. experienced male and female trail runners: comparing running economy, biomechanics, strength, and power. J Strength Cond Res 37(7): 1470-1478, 2023-The increased participation in trail running (TR) races and the emergence of official international races have increased the performance level of the world best trail runners. The aim of this study was to compare cost of running (Cr) and biomechanical and neuromuscular characteristics of elite trail runners with their lower level counterparts. Twenty elite (10 females; ELITE) and 21 experienced (10 females; EXP) trail runners participated in the study. Cr and running biomechanics were measured at 10 and 14 km·h-1 on flat and at 10 km·h-1 with 10% uphill incline. Subjects also performed maximal isometric voluntary contractions of knee and hip extensors and knee flexors and maximal sprints on a cycle ergometer to assess the power-torque-velocity profile (PTVP). Athletes also reported their training volume during the previous year. Despite no differences in biomechanics, ELITE had a lower Cr than EXP (p < 0.05). Despite nonsignificant difference in maximal lower-limb power between groups, ELITE displayed a greater relative torque (p < 0.01) and lower maximal velocity (p < 0.01) in the PTVP. Females displayed shorter contact times (p < 0.01) compared with males, but no sex differences were observed in Cr (p > 0.05). No sex differences existed for the PTVP slope, whereas females exhibited lower relative torque (p < 0.01) and velocity capacities (p < 0.01) compared with males. Although not comprehensively assessing all determining factors of TR performance, those data evidenced level and sex specificities of trail runners in some factors of performance. Strength training can be suggested to lower level trail runners to improve Cr and thus TR performance.

Elite Road vs. Trail Runners: Comparing Economy, Biomechanics, Strength, and Power.

ABSTRACT: Sabater Pastor, FS, Besson, T, Berthet, M, Varesco, G, Kennouche, D, Dandrieux, P-E, Rossi, J, and Millet, GY. Elite road vs. trail runners: comparing economy, biomechanics, strength, and power. J Strength Cond Res 37(1): 181-186, 2023-The purpose of this study was to determine the differences between road (ROAD) vs. trail (TRAIL) elite runners in terms of force-velocity profile (FVP), running biomechanics, lower-limb maximal isometric strength, cost of running (Cr), and training. Seventeen male elite athletes (10 TRAIL and 7 ROAD) participated in this study. Force-velocity profile was measured using a 2-sprint test on a cycle ergometer. Strength was assessed with a dynamometer measuring isometric maximum voluntary torque of the knee extensors and knee flexors. Biomechanics parameters (running kinematics and stiffness) were measured, and Cr was calculated at 10 and 14 km·h-1 at 0% slope and at 10 km·h-1 on a 10% slope on a treadmill. Athletes also reported their training duration during the previous year. Theoretical maximal torque (F0) and maximal power (Pmax) in the FVP were higher for TRAIL vs. ROAD (122 ± 13 vs. 99 ± 7 N·m, p = 0.001; and 726 ± 89 vs. 626 ± 44 W; p = 0.016). Cost of running was higher for TRAIL compared with ROAD on flat at 14 km·h-1 (4.32 ± 0.22 vs. 4.06 ± 0.29 J·kg-1·m-1; p = 0.047) but similar at 10 km·h-1 and uphill. No differences were found in maximal isometric strength or running biomechanics. ROAD spent 81% more time training than TRAIL (p = 0.0003). The specific training (i.e., "natural" resistance training) performed during graded running in trail runners and training on level surface at high speed may explain our results. Alternatively, it is possible that trail running selects stronger athletes because of the greater strength requirements of graded running.