Robustness and relevance of predictive score in sudden cardiac death for patients with Brugada syndrome.

AIMS: Risk stratification of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in Brugada syndrome (Brs) remains the main challenge for physicians. Several scores have been suggested to improve risk stratification but never replicated. We aim to investigate the accuracy of the Brs risk scores. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1613 patients [mean age 45 ± 15 years, 69% male, 323 (20%) symptomatic] were prospectively enrolled from 1993 to 2016 in a multicentric database. All data described in the risk score were double reviewed for the study. Among them, all patients were evaluated with Shanghai score and 461 (29%) with Sieira score. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 ± 4.7 years, an arrhythmic event occurred in 75 (5%) patients including 16 SCA, 11 symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, and 48 appropriate therapies. Predictive capacity of the Shanghai score (n = 1613) and the Sieira (n = 461) score was, respectively, estimated by an area under the curve of 0.73 (0.67-0.79) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81). Considering Sieira score, the event rate at 10 years was significantly higher with a score of 5 (26.4%) than with a score of 0 (0.9%) or 1 (1.1%) (P < 0.01). No statistical difference was found in intermediate-risk patients (score 2-4). The Shanghai score does not allow to better stratify the risk of SCA. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest cohort of Brs patient ever described, risk scores do not allow stratifying the risk of arrhythmic event in intermediate-risk patient.

Age at diagnosis of Brugada syndrome: Influence on clinical characteristics and risk of arrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: Despite a strong genetic background, Brugada syndrome (BrS) mainly affects middle-age patients. Data are scarce in the youngest and oldest age groups. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and variations in rhythmic risk in BrS patients according to age. METHODS: Consecutive BrS patients diagnosed in 15 French tertiary centers in France were enrolled from 1993 to 2016 and followed up prospectively. All of the clinical and ECG data were double reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 1613 patients enrolled (age 45 ± 15 years; 69% male), 3 groups were defined according to age (52 patients <17 years; 1285 between 17 and 59 years; and 276 >60 years). In the youngest patients, we identified more female gender (42%), diagnosis by familial screening (63%), previous sudden cardiac death (15%), SCN5A mutation (62%) sinus dysfunction (8%) and aVR sign (37%) (P <.001). The oldest patients had the same clinical characteristics except for gender (40% women; P <.001). During median follow-up of 5.5 [2.1, 10.0] years, 91 patients experienced an arrhythmic event, including 7 (13%) in the youngest patients, 80 (6%) in middle-age patients, and 4 (1%) in the oldest patients. Annual event rates were 2.1%, 1%, and 0.3%, respectively (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Age on diagnosis changes the clinical presentation of BrS. Although children are identified more during familial screening, they present the highest risk of sudden cardiac death, which is an argument for early and extensive familial screening. The oldest patients present the lowest risk of SCD.

Number of electrocardiogram leads in the diagnosis of spontaneous Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The recently recommended single lead-based criterion for the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome may lead to overdiagnosis of this disorder and overestimation of the risk of sudden cardiac death. AIM: To investigate the value of a single-lead diagnosis in patients with Brugada syndrome and a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram. METHODS: Consecutive patients with Brugada syndrome were included in a multicentre prospective registry; only those with a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram were enrolled. Clinical and electrocardiogram data were reviewed by two physicians blinded to the patients' clinical and genetic status. RESULTS: Among 1613 patients, 505 (31%) were enrolled (79% male; mean age 46±15 years). A spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram pattern was found in one lead in 250 patients (group 1), in two leads in 227 patients (group 2) and in three leads in 27 patients (group 3). Groups were similar except for individuals in group 3, who presented more frequently a fragmented QRS complex, an early repolarization pattern and a prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval. After a mean follow-up of 6.4±4.7 years, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death or implantable cardiac defibrillator shock occurred in 46 (9%) patients, without differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of Brugada syndrome with a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram pattern does not appear to be affected by the number of leads required for the diagnosis.

Clinical presentation and follow-up of women affected by Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Studies in Brugada syndrome (BrS) have mainly consisted of men. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and arrhythmic risk factors in BrS women. METHODS: Consecutive BrS patients were enrolled from 1993 and followed prospectively. RESULTS: Among 1613 patients, 494 were women (mean age 47 ± 16 years). Women were more frequently asymptomatic than men (423 [86%] vs 867 [77%], respectively; P = .001) and less frequently had a spontaneous ECG pattern (107 [22%] vs 398 [36%], respectively; P <.001). During median [25th, 75th percentile] follow-up of 57 [23, 118] vs 62 [22, 113] months (P = .65), arrhythmic events occurred in 12 women (2%) vs 79 men (7%) (P = .0005). Mean age at the first event was 48.6 ± 17.8 years for women vs 43 ± 14.2 years for men (P <.001). Gender was significantly related to cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-5.4; P = .0005). In multivariate analysis, event predictors in women were index patient status (HR 10.15; 95% CI 1.7-61.4; P = .01), previous sudden cardiac death (HR 69.4; 95% CI 15-312.5; P <.0001), syncope (HR 6.8; 95% CI 1.4-34.5; P = .02), fragmented QRS (HR 20.2; 95% CI 1.8-228.9; P = .02), and QRS duration >120 ms (HR 4.7; 95% CI 1.2-19.5; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Women represent a lower-risk group than men among individuals with BrS. In asymptomatic women, fragmented QRS and QRS >120 ms seem to be the only event predictors.