Implantable cardiac monitors: artificial intelligence and signal processing reduce remote ECG review workload and preserve arrhythmia detection sensitivity.

Introduction: Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide long-term arrhythmia monitoring, but high rates of false detections increase the review burden. The new "SmartECG" algorithm filters false detections. Using large real-world data sets, we aimed to quantify the reduction in workload and any loss in sensitivity from this new algorithm. Methods: Patients with a BioMonitor IIIm and any device indication were included from three clinical projects. All subcutaneous ECGs (sECGs) transmitted via remote monitoring were classified by the algorithm as "true" or "false." We quantified the relative reduction in workload assuming "false" sECGs were ignored. The remote monitoring workload from five hospitals with established remote monitoring routines was evaluated. Loss in sensitivity was estimated by testing a sample of 2000 sECGs against a clinical board of three physicians. Results: Of our population of 368 patients, 42% had an indication for syncope or pre-syncope and 31% for cryptogenic stroke. Within 418.5 patient-years of follow-up, 143,096 remote monitoring transmissions contained 61,517 sECGs. SmartECG filtered 42.8% of all sECGs as "false," reducing the number per patient-year from 147 to 84. In five hospitals, nine trained reviewers inspected on average 105 sECGs per working hour. This results in an annual working time per patient of 83 min without SmartECG, and 48 min with SmartECG. The loss of sensitivity is estimated as 2.6%. In the majority of cases where true arrhythmias were rejected, SmartECG classified the same type of arrhythmia as "true" before or within 3 days of the falsely rejected sECG. Conclusion: SmartECG increases efficiency in long-term arrhythmia monitoring using ICMs. The reduction of workload by SmartECG is meaningful and the risk of missing a relevant arrhythmia due to incorrect filtering by the algorithm is limited.

Implementation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in daily practice: the need for comprehensive education for professionals and patients.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. NOACs do not require routine coagulation monitoring, creating a challenge to established systems for patient follow-up based on regular blood tests. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are required to cope with a mixture of patients receiving either a vitamin K antagonist or a NOAC for the same indications, and both professionals and patients require education about the newer drugs. A European working group convened to consider the challenges facing HCPs and healthcare systems in different countries and the educational gaps that hinder optimal patient management. Group members emphasised the need for regular follow-up and noted national, regional and local variations in set-up and resources for follow-up. Practical incorporation of NOACs into healthcare systems must adapt to these differences, and practical follow-up that works in some systems may not be able to be implemented in others. The initial prescriber of a NOAC should preferably be a true anticoagulation specialist, who can provide initial patient education and coordinate the follow-up. The long-term follow-up care of patients can be managed through specialist coagulation nurses, in a dedicated anticoagulation clinic or by general practitioners trained in NOAC use. The initial prescriber should be involved in educating those who perform the follow-up. Specialist nurses require access to tools, potentially including specific software, to guide systematic patient assessment and workflow. Problem cases should be referred for specialist advice, whereas in cases for which minimal specialist attention is required, the general practitioner could take responsibility for patient follow-up. Hospital departments and anticoagulation clinics should proactively engage with all downstream HCPs (including pharmacists) to ensure their participation in patient management and reinforcement of patient education at every opportunity. Ideally, (transmural) protocols for emergency situations should be developed. Last but not least, patients should be well-informed about their condition, the treatment, possible risk scenarios, including the consequences of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, and the organisation of follow-up care.

Prevalence and antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation in hospitalised patients.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a tertiary care centre, to describe the comorbidity profile of hospitalised patients with AF, and to evaluate the appropriateness of their maintenance antithrombotic management. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, descriptive study, all consenting hospitalised patients from 36 wards in a University hospital (excluding critical care units, psychiatric, maternity and paediatric wards) received an ECG on a single day. Also their charts were reviewed for key demographic and clinical data. For patients with AF, all factors and comorbidities comprising thromboembolic (CHA2DS2-VASc) and bleeding risk (HAS-BLED) were listed. The appropriateness of long-term anticoagulant therapy was assessed according to the 2010 international guidelines (CHA2DS2-VASc score 0=aspirin or no antithrombotic treatment; 1=aspirin or oral anticoagulant treatment (OAC); ≥2=OAC). The response rate was 79.7%, that is, an ECG was performed in 636 of 812 eligible hospitalised patients. RESULTS: AF was present on ECG in 58 patients reflecting a 9.1% hospital point prevalence (95% CI 6.9% to 11.3%). Of the remaining 587 participants, 49 had a history of AF. Hence, 107 AF cases were identified, yielding a total prevalence of 16.8% (95% CI 13.9% to 19.7%). Patients with AF were detected in every hospital zone, with highest prevalence rates in zone 'thorax' (29.3% (95% CI 22.2% to 36.4%)) and 'internal medicine' (21.7% (95%CI 14.8% to 28.6%)). Patients with AF were older than patients without AF (78.7±10.3 years versus 62.7±15.9 years; p<0.001). The most common associated comorbidities were hypertension (63.6%) and valvular heart disease (58.9%). Most patients with AF were at high risk for stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc-score ≥2 in 92.5%). Overall, only 51.3% of all patients did receive appropriate anticoagulant long-term management, while 31% were undertreated and 17.7% were possibly overtreated. CONCLUSIONS: This hospital-based study revealed high AF prevalence rates (16.8%). Patients with AF were present in all hospital zones and almost all patients were at high risk for stroke. Anticoagulation management was likely inappropriate in 48.7%, indicating the need for better guideline implementation initiatives to guarantee hospital-wide optimised care for patients with AF.

Impact of corticosteroid-related symptoms in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: results of a survey of 985 patients.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) therapy is effective in many patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), although it is associated with adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to describe the CS-related symptom experience of adult patients with ITP and to compare the symptom experience of current users of CS, previous users of CS, and those who have never used CS. METHODS: In 2006, adult members of the Platelet Disorder Support Association (PDSA) who were listed in the organization's database, resided in the United States, and had a diagnosis of ITP were invited to participate in a Web-based survey. Symptom experience was assessed using 33 CS-related symptoms derived from a scale developed for use in patients undergoing organ transplantation. Symptom experience over the past 4 weeks was measured in terms of the occurrence of symptoms (rated on a 5-point scale from 1 [never occurring] to 5 [always occurring]) and the distress associated with those symptoms (rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 [not at all distressing] to 4 [extremely distressing]). Respondents were categorized according to 4 patterns of CS use: current users, nonusers, previous users who stopped CS use <6 months earlier, and previous users who stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 985 patients with ITP (8.2% of the PDSA membership). The median age of the sample was 47 years, and the ratio of women to men was 3:1. One hundred sixteen patients (11.8%) were current CS users, 171 (17.4%) were nonusers, 99 (10.1%) had stopped CS use <6 months earlier, and 599 (60.8%) had stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier. In all 4 groups, back pain, fatigue, sleep difficulties, muscle weakness, and difficulty seeing well were reported to be the most frequently occurring and most distressing symptoms. Current CS users and those who stopped CS treatment <6 months earlier also reported bruises to be among their most frequent and distressing symptoms. Twenty-five of the 33 symptoms occurred more frequently in current CS users than in nonusers, and 30 symptoms occurred more frequently in current users than in previous users who had stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier. Symptom occurrence was significantly greater for current users compared with those who stopped CS use <6 months earlier for puffy face (q = 0.003), excessive appetite (q = 0.002), changed facial features (q = 0.033), and buffalo hump (q = 0.048). Patients who had stopped CS use <6 months earlier reported 20 of the 33 symptoms significantly more often than those who had stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier (q < 0.05). The only symptoms reported significantly more often in patients who had stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier compared with nonusers were buffalo hump and bruises (q < 0.05). The distress associated with bruises was significantly higher in current users compared with nonusers and compared with previous users who had stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier (both, q = 0.047). Current users also reported significantly greater distress than nonusers for puffy face and excessive appetite (both, q = 0.047). Changed facial features was significantly more distressing in current users compared with those who had stopped CS use >or=6 months earlier (q = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Different symptom profiles emerged based on the pattern of CS use. Patients who were currently using CS or who had stopped CS treatment <6 months earlier reported more symptoms than did patients who had never received CS or who had stopped CS treatment =6 months earlier.

Beliefs and attitudes of intensive care nurses toward visits and open visiting policy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the beliefs and attitudes of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses toward visiting, visiting hours, and open visiting policies in critical care settings. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter survey. SETTING: Seventeen hospitals in Flanders (Dutch-speaking Belgium), including 30 ICUs. Sixteen mixed adult medical/surgical ICUs, three medical ICUs, five surgical ICUs, three coronary care units, two post-cardiac surgery ICUs, and one burn unit. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 531 intensive care nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We devised a questionnaire comprising 20 items assessing beliefs and 14 items assessing attitudes. Nurses indicated their level of agreement for each statement on a five-point rating scale. Nurses believed that open visiting hampers planning of adequate nursing care (75.2%), interferes with direct nursing care (73.8%), and causes nurses to spend more time in providing information to the patients' families (82.3%). The presumed effects of visits on the patients and families were contradictory. Most nurses (75.3%) did not want to liberalize the visiting policy of their unit. CONCLUSIONS: ICU nurses have rather skeptical beliefs and attitudes toward visiting and open visiting policy. This suggests that the culture at Flemish ICUs is not ready for a drastic liberalization of the visiting policy.