[Career prospects for ophthalmologists under 49 years old : A survey in Germany from 2022]. / Berufliche Zukunftsperspektive von Augenärzten unter 49 Jahren : Eine Umfrage in Deutschland aus dem Jahr 2022.

OBJECTIVE: The need for care in ophthalmology is constantly increasing due to demographic changes. The study analyzed the current professional situation and future prospects of ophthalmologists under 49 years old. METHODS: The survey of members of the German Association of Ophthalmologists (Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands) and the German Ophthalmologic Society (Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft) was conducted in 2022. All members under the age of 49 years received an online questionnaire on the current professional situation as well as future perspectives (desired working hours, form of organization). The results of the survey were additionally compared with the 2016 survey of the German Association of Ophthalmologists. A similar questionnaire was used at that time. RESULTS: A total of 1014 people participated in the survey (62.7% women, mean age 39.3 ± 8 years, 75.6% specialists). The response rate to the survey was 25%. Specialist practice from 0 to 5 years showed a higher number of employed ophthalmologists (21% self-employed vs. 32% employed); over time the number of self-employed ophthalmologists increased (6-10 years: 40%, > 10 years: 59.3%). Overall, 46% of women were employed in a practice compared with 33% of men. Of the self-employed specialists, 95.9% said they planned to work in the same type of employment in 10 years as currently. Regarding ophthalmologists' career future, the other employment types showed a desire to move to independent practice. Compared to the 2016 survey, gender differences related to the current type of employment were evident. The number of self-employed women decreased from 43% to 26% and self-employed men decreased from 63% to 39%. The number of ophthalmologists in ambulatory healthcare centers was doubled compared to 2016. Ophthalmologists reported similar future perspectives at both survey times. CONCLUSION: The results of the survey of ophthalmologists under 49 years in Germany showed similar perceptions as in 2016. It became clear that the desire to be self-employed in 10 years is very high; however, ophthalmologists expected large practices or medical care centers to prevail in the market. The number of self-employed doctors is decreasing and the desire for self-employment is difficult to realize.

[The most serious incident-Experiences of aggression and violence in ophthalmology]. / Der schwerwiegendste Vorfall ­ Erfahrungen von Aggressionen und Gewalt in der Augenheilkunde.

BACKGROUND: Experiences of aggression/violence influence job satisfaction and can have a long-term psychological and physical impact on employees. In the fall of 2018, the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA) and the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) conducted a survey on experiences of aggression and violence. The first results were published in 2020. In the survey it was also possible to describe the most serious incident to date using free text fields, among others. METHOD: All 9411 members of the DOG and BVA were given the opportunity to complete a questionnaire online in 2018 regarding aggression and violence in ophthalmology. RESULTS: Overall, 253 of 1508 (16.8%) ophthalmologists participating in the survey reported their most serious incident, 46.8% of which were classified as moderate and 34.3% were related to verbal violence such as insults and threats. The most serious incident was experienced by 171 (67.6%) physicians in a practice setting, 71% were specialists at the time of the incident and 74.3% of the incidents occurred during regular working hours. The main causes were intercultural conflicts, long waiting times, problems with the allocation of appointments, excessive expectations, differences in treatment and basic aggressiveness. The offenders were male in 86.3% of cases, 15.8% of the incidents were reported to the police and 21 (8.3%) physicians issued a practice reprimand or house ban. DISCUSSION: The description of the most serious incidents illustrates situations that are sometimes hard to imagine and also which incidents were considered serious. There are large subjective variations in the assessment of the incidents. Protective measures in practices and clinics are essential.

[Assessment of subjective risk of infection and willingness to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2 among German ophthalmologists : Results of a survey by DOG and BVA]. / Einschätzung des subjektiven Infektionsrisikos und Impfbereitschaft gegen SARS-CoV-2 unter deutschen Augenärzten : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage von DOG und BVA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After approval of the first COVID-19 vaccines in Germany, vaccination prioritization and vaccination preparedness are central topics in the discussion on strategies to end the pandemic. How ophthalmologists evaluate their risk of infection and whether they are willing to be vaccinated has not been investigated so far. The aim of this project was to assess the subjective rating of the risk of infection and the willingness to be vaccinated among German ophthalmologists. METHODS: Data were collected by an anonymous online survey conducted by the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany (BVA) and the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) under the auspices of the University Eye Hospital Düsseldorf. The questionnaire was open for participation from 22 January to 12 February 2021. The survey was addressed to all colleagues in ophthalmology. RESULTS: A total of 1162 completed questionnaires were analyzed. On average, survey respondents rated their risk of infection as 7.5 ± 1.9 (scale of 1-10; 1 = very low risk, 10 = very high risk). Of the respondents 971 (83.6%) rated their risk of infection as higher compared to other disciplines and 92.9% (n = 1079) indicated they would be willing to be vaccinated. CONCLUSION: The ophthalmologists interviewed consider their professional group to be exposed to an above-average risk of SARS-COV­2 infection compared to other disciplines. They frequently criticized the prioritization ranking of the German Ministry of Health (BMG), which deviated from the suggestions of the Standing Vaccination Committee of Germany (STIKO). The willingness to be vaccinated was very high among the surveyed German ophthalmologists.

[Experiences of aggression and violence against ophthalmologists]. / Erfahrungen von Aggression und Gewalt gegen Augenärztinnen und Augenärzte.

BACKGROUND: The media have reported an increased willingness of patients and relatives to use violence against medical personnel. So far a few studies have been carried out on this topic and the data situation is correspondingly weak. Ophthalmologists in particular have close contact with patients at the slit lamp and are often alone with patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed based on the perception of prevalence of aggression scale (POPAS) questionnaire and the survey on aggression and violence among general practitioners. In autumn 2018, all members of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA) received an invitation by e­mail to complete the questionnaire online. RESULTS: Of the 9411 ophthalmologists contacted a total of 1508 (age 49 ± 12 years) took part in the survey (16%). Of the respondents 806 (53.7%) were female and 1139 (75.5%) participants worked in practices. A total of 1264 (83.3%) ophthalmologists had experienced aggression/violence in their work, 986 (65%) respondents had already experienced verbal assaults without threats, 363 (24.1%) doctors reported experiences with threats of physical violence and 30 (2%) participants had received medical treatment for severe physical violence. Sexual intimidation/harassment was affirmed by 322 (21.4%) of respondents, of whom 243 (75.5%) were female and 533 (47.9%) doctors felt that aggressive/violent behavior had increased in the last 5 years. CONCLUSION: The high number of participants indicates the high relevance of the topic. The survey produced astonishing results, which should lead to further discussion and action to improve the safety of employees.

Update of the evidence based, interdisciplinary guideline for anti-inflammatory treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIAU) is frequently associated with the development of complications and visual loss. Topical corticosteroids are the first line therapy, and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are commonly used. However, treatment has not been standardized. METHODS: Interdisciplinary guideline were developed with representatives from the German Ophthalmological Society, Society for Paediatric Rheumatology, Professional Association of Ophthalmologists, German Society for Rheumatology, parents' group, moderated by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. A systematic literature analysis in MEDLINE was performed, evidence and recommendations were graded, an algorithm for anti-inflammatory treatment and final statements were discussed in a consensus meeting (Nominal Group Technique), a preliminary draft was fine-tuned and discussed thereafter by all participants (Delphi procedure). RESULTS: Consensus was reached on recommendations, including a standardized treatment strategy according to uveitis severity in the individual patient. Thus, methotrexate shall be introduced for uveitis not responding to low-dose (≤ 2 applications/day) topical corticosteroids, and a TNFalpha antibody (preferably adalimumab) used, if uveitis inactivity is not achieved. In very severe active uveitis with uveitis-related deterioration of vision, systemic corticosteroids should be considered for bridging until DMARDs take effect. If TNFalpha antibodies fail to take effect or lose effect, another biological should be selected (tocilizumab, abatacept or rituximab). De-escalation of DMARDs should be preceded by a period of  ≥ 2 years of uveitis inactivity. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary, evidence-based treatment guideline for JIAU is presented.

[Who visits an ophthalmologist and how often? Results of the German nationwide adult health survey (DEGS1)]. / Wer geht wie oft zum Augenarzt in Deutschland? Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1).

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of eye diseases increases in the second half of life, especially cataract, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration. In this study we examined the influencing factors for visiting an ophthalmologist in the last 12 months. METHODS: Visits to an ophthalmologist's practice in the last 12 months and the frequency were surveyed in the German nationwide adult health survey wave 1 (DEGS1) study (baseline examination from 2008 to 2011, N = 7987, 52.6% women, age 18-79 years). Data on utilization were processed by taking the complex study design into consideration. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine associated factors including age, sex, socioeconomic status, place of residence, type of health insurance (e.g. statutory or private) and diabetes. RESULTS: Between the ages of 18 and 79 years, 29.3% of survey participants in Germany visited an ophthalmologist in the last year, while after the age of 60 years this was only 50.4%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed an association with female sex (odds ratio OR = 1.51, p < 0.001), older age, type of health insurance (private vs. statutory: OR = 0.77, p = 0.006) and diabetes (OR = 3.84, p < 0.001), but no association with socioeconomic status (p = 0.29) or place of residence (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Approximately one third of the German population visit an ophthalmologist at least once a year. Especially diabetics showed a high utilization of ophthalmological consultations, which could be based on the interdisciplinary guidelines for early detection of diabetic eye complications.

[National guidelines for treatment of diabetic retinopathy : Second edition of the national guidelines for treatment of diabetic retinopathy]. / Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie (NVL) Diabetische Retinopathie : 2. Auflage der NVL zur Therapie der diabetischen Retinopathie.

The updated German clinical practice guidelines (second edition) describe the consensus recommendations for prevention and treatment of retinal complications secondary to diabetes. According to the updated numbers on epidemiology a further increase of persons affected is expected. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy is estimated to be 9-16 % in type 2 diabetes and 24-27 % in type 1 diabetes. A prolongation of the screening interval from 1 to 2 years is recommended for those patients with a lower risk of progression, when retinopathy has not already occurred and no increased systemic risk factors are present. Standardized documentation forms are the foundation for improved communication between the disciplines. If diabetic retinopathy is present, control examinations follow the stipulations of the ophthalmologist. The guidelines define scenarios when the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) is necessary, e. g. diagnosis and follow-up of macular edema. Besides focal and panretinal laser therapy, the efficacy and risks of intravitreal operative pharmacotherapy are discussed. Focal laser coagulation is recommended for therapy of macular edema without foveal involvement and for macular edema with foveal involvement patients should be informed about the effective alternative forms of treatment. Panretinal laser coagulation is recommended for first line treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and is optional for severe non-proliferative retinopathy.

[Increase in examinations for cataracts, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration : Comparative cross-sectional study between 2010 and 1997 in ophthalmological practices]. / Zunahme der Untersuchungen wegen Katarakt, Glaukom, diabetischer Retinopathie und Makuladegeneration : Vergleichende Querschnittstudie der Jahre 2010 und 1997 in Augenarztpraxen.

BACKGROUND: The importance of the four most commonly occurring vision-threatening diseases, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and cataract in ophthalmological practices has changed due to demographic developments, medical progress and transference of inpatient treatment to the outpatient area of private practice. METHODS: In the fourth quarter year of 2010 a survey of 15,125 patients (approximately 10%) from 96 private ophthalmology practices (mean 149 patients per ophthalmologist, range 45-376) was carried out. The results for the four most commonly occurring vision-threatening diseases were compared with the result from a previous survey carried out for the fourth quarter year of 1997. RESULTS: Compared to 1997 there was an increase in the age-adjusted proportion of examinations in 2010 for cataracts by 29 %, for glaucoma by 21 %, for diabetic retinopathy by 39 % and for vitreoretinal diseases by 19 %. The number of AMD examinations in the age group over 70 years old showed a particularly high increase. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients examined for the four most commonly occurring vision-threatening diseases increased from 1997 to 2010 not only in absolute numbers but also in relation to age. In the future financial and personnel resources must be made available for the early and guidelines-conform detection, diagnostics and therapy by ophthalmologists.

[Potentials and limitations of the planned compulsory quality assurance program for cataract surgery (Qesü)]. / Potenziale und Grenzen der geplanten obligatorischen Qualitätssicherung für Kataraktoperation (Qesü).

Cataract surgery is scheduled for a federal program for quality improvement across the different sectors of care (outpatient care and hospitals). In case of implementation not only ophthalmic surgeons but all ophthalmologists would have to contribute to the documentation. Urgency, potential benefits and limitations of a compulsory compared to a voluntary quality assessment system are analyzed.

[Trends in inpatient treatment in ophthalmology in Germany]. / Entwicklung der stationären augenärztlichen Versorgung in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade inpatient treatment has been reduced in favor of outpatient care or markedly shortened inpatient stays in most organ-specific surgical specialties such as ophthalmology in Germany. METHODS: Data from the federal statistics agency on the international classification of disease (ICD), diagnosis-related groups (DRG) and performed operations and procedures from 2000 to 2010 as well as data from the Institute for Reimbursements of Hospitals (InEK) on average costs per DRG in every German DRG (G-DRG) version from 2004 to 2010 were analyzed for ophthalmology. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, the number of cases with a main ophthalmological diagnosis decreased (-19 %), which was mostly due to a reduction in the number of cataract inpatients (-56 %). All subspecialties such as glaucoma (+82 %) and retina (+68 %) with the exception of primary strabismus diagnoses (-15 %) gained in number of cases. Inpatient cataract surgery was the most common surgery in 2004 but numbers decreased to 2010 (-9 %). The most often performed inpatient procedure was vitreoretinal surgery in 2007 and 2010 (increase 2004-2010 + 46 %). Average hospital stay decreased between 2005 and 2010 from 3.9 to 3.4 days and the average cost per case increased by 3.6 % overall and by 13.4 % for surgical cases. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmic healthcare provided as inpatient services decreased with a trend towards more complex cases being treated as inpatients from 2000 to 2010.

[Age, sex and diagnostic distribution of patients in ophthalmological medical practice in Germany]. / Die Patientenpopulation der augenärztlichen Praxen in Deutschland: Alter, Geschlecht und Diagnosen.

OBJECTIVE: The ophthalmological patient care in Germany has changed over the past decades due to demographic and diagnostic facility change and the shift from inpatient to outpatient care. METHOD: In the fourth quarter of 2010 a survey was conducted including almost 10 % of the patients of 96 ophthalmologists. The results for age, sex, main and secondary diagnosis and the main reason for the examination were examined and compared with those of surveys from 1966 and 1997. RESULTS: 15125 patients (median per doctor: 149, range: 45-376) were included in the survey. 58 % were women. The proportion of women was elevated in all decades compared to men, apart from the first age decade. The proportion of older patients (70 +) increased (1997: 25.3 %; 2010: 40.8 %) although the age distribution in Germany appears to be rather constant (1997: 11.9 %; 2010: 15.3 %). The proportion of examinations due to glaucoma, diabetes and vitreoretinal diseases increased by almost 60 % compared to 1997. CONCLUSION: Compared to the results of 1997, we observed a marked change from simple to differentiated cases in ophthalmological medical practice in Germany. The early diagnosis and therapy have to be guaranteed in the future taking into account the limited resources.