Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 87(11): 100595, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778702

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Determine the impact of prematriculation course withdrawals on first year pharmacy school (P1) success, defined as on-time progression to the second (P2) year without remediation. METHODS: A retrospective review of students matriculating to a four-year private institution from 2018 to 2021 was conducted. Potential predictors of P1 year success including age, sex, highest degree achieved, prematriculation grade point average (GPA), and course withdrawals were collected. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis indicates that age, cumulative GPA, science GPA, and prematriculation course withdrawals were significantly different between students who were successful vs unsuccessful in the first year of pharmacy school. Out of 220 students analyzed, 40.9% (n = 90) were unsuccessful in the first year. Of those 90 P1 students, 52% did not progress to the P2 year, and 48% progressed but required course remediation. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that independent predictors of P1 success included cumulative GPA and having less than two prematriculation course withdrawals. In addition, the number of prematriculation course withdrawals, cumulative GPA, and having a bachelor's degree or higher were independent predictors of P1 GPA. CONCLUSION: Prematriculation course withdrawal was an independent predictor of both P1 success and P1 GPA. Students with less than two prematriculation course withdrawals were more likely to be successful during the first year of pharmacy school. College of pharmacy admission committees may consider prematriculation course withdrawal frequency when making admission decisions or to identify students that may need additional academic support during the first year of pharmacy school.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy , Pharmacy , Students, Pharmacy , Humans , Educational Measurement , Schools, Pharmacy , Achievement , School Admission Criteria
2.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 15(2): 139-148, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Men who have sex with men (MSM), especially Black MSM, are disproportionately affected by HIV and experience disparate prescription of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention compared to White MSM. While pharmacists are essential in efforts to scale-up PrEP, little is known about the role of knowledge and implicit biases in pharmacy students' decision-making regarding PrEP, which may elucidate mechanisms for improving PrEP access and addressing disparities. METHODS: A nationwide, cross-sectional study of pharmacy students in the United States was conducted. A fictional White or Black MSM seeking PrEP was presented. Participants completed measures of PrEP/HIV knowledge, implicit racism and heterosexism, assumptions about the patient's behavior (condomless sex, extra-relational sex, adherence to PrEP), and confidence providing PrEP-related care. RESULTS: A total of 194 pharmacy students completed the study. Compared to the White patient, the Black patient was assumed to be less adherent to PrEP if prescribed. In contrast, assumptions of sexual risk behaviors if prescribed PrEP and confidence providing PrEP-related care did not differ. Additionally, implicit racism was associated with lower confidence providing PrEP-related care, whereas PrEP/HIV knowledge, implicit sexual orientation bias, and assumed sexual risk behaviors if prescribed PrEP were not associated with confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists are essential in efforts to scale-up PrEP prescription, making pharmacy education about PrEP for HIV prevention critical. These findings suggest that implicit bias awareness training is needed. This training may reduce the influence of implicit racial bias on confidence providing PrEP-related care and improve knowledge of HIV and PrEP.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Students, Pharmacy , Humans , Male , Female , Homosexuality, Male , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Bias, Implicit , Cross-Sectional Studies , Bias
3.
J Appl Lab Med ; 8(3): 514-522, 2023 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (PN Panel) provides a more rapid and sensitive method of respiratory pathogen detection than standard culture. However, it is often unclear how to apply the results clinically, especially in the case of discordant culture results. We evaluated the concordance of bacterial organism and resistance gene identification between the PN Panel and standard culture methods in hospitalized patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study of 274 inpatients assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) and described the prevalence of individual bacterial organism and resistance marker targets on the PN Panel. RESULTS: The overall PPV of the PN Panel in identifying bacteria was 70.1%, with individual organism PPV ranging from 50.0% to 90.9%. For resistance gene identification, the PN Panel's PPV ranged from 46.2% for CTX-M to 68.4% for mecA/C and the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element right extremity junction (MREJ), although resistance was uncommon. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacterial pathogen detected by the PN Panel (38.7%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.3%), and Haemophilus influenzae (12.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The PN Panel detected more bacteria and resistance gene targets than standard culture methods. To optimize the use of this technology for both patient care and antimicrobial stewardship, results should be coupled with clinical assessment and clinician education.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Pathology, Molecular , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Bacteria/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus
4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 50(3): 172-174, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36455293

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: In this case series of 20 ambulatory and hospitalized adult patients treated for monkeypox virus at a large academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois, tecovirimat use was reserved for those with or at high risk of severe disease, delayed because of logistical and clinical factors, but well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Adult , Humans , Benzamides , Chicago
5.
Orthop Nurs ; 40(4): 248-254, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397982

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic administration in the perioperative period is the foundation of preventing surgical site infections. ß-Lactam antibiotics, notably the first-generation cephalosporin cefazolin, are the drugs of choice for this indication. However, reported antibiotic allergies often result in the use of suboptimal alternative agents that can lead to an increased risk of infection and adverse effects. A comprehensive allergy history and risk stratification should be completed preoperatively to determine whether or not a patient can be rechallenged with a ß-lactam antibiotic and what testing may be necessary prior to administration. Nursing staff can play a critical role in understanding the implications and management of reported antibiotic allergies in surgical patients in order to optimize patient care.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Aminoglycosides/administration & dosage , Aminoglycosides/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Aztreonam/administration & dosage , Aztreonam/adverse effects , Cefazolin/administration & dosage , Cefazolin/adverse effects , Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , Vancomycin/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/administration & dosage , beta-Lactams/adverse effects
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(11): e872-e875, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242095

ABSTRACT

Alternative antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis are associated with increased adverse events and surgical site infection compared to cefazolin. In a sample of perioperative inpatients from 100 hospitals in the United States, cefazolin was 9-fold less likely to be used in patients with a documented ß-lactam allergy whereas clindamycin was 45-fold more likely.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , beta-Lactams , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Documentation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , United States , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...