Damage control orthopaedics: State of the art.

Damage control orthopaedics (DCO) originally consisted of the provisional immobilisation of long bone - mainly femur - fractures in order to achieve the advantages of early treatment and to minimise the risk of complications, such as major pain, fat embolism, clotting, pathological inflammatory response, severe haemorrhage triggering the lethal triad, and the traumatic effects of major surgery on a patient who is already traumatised (the "second hit" effect). In recent years, new locations have been added to the DCO concept, such as injuries to the pelvis, spine and upper limbs. Nonetheless, this concept has not yet been validated in well-designed prospective studies, and much controversy remains. Indeed, some researchers believe the indiscriminate application of DCO might be harmful and produce substantial and unnecessary expense. In this respect, too, normalised parameters associated with the acid-base system have been proposed, under a concept termed early appropriate care, in the view that this would enable patients to receive major surgical procedures in an approach offering the advantages of early total care together with the apparent safety of DCO. This paper discusses the diagnosis and treatment of severely traumatised patients managed in accordance with DCO and highlights the possible drawbacks of this treatment principle.

Malalignment in intramedullary nailing. How to achieve and to maintain correct reduction?

Intramedullary nailing has become the standard for the treatment of long bones diaphyseal fractures. Modern techniques of locking have further enlarged the primary indications to more proximal and distal fractures relying upon a former correct alignment. Nevertheless, residual deformities are not rare as once the nail has left the narrow diaphyseal canal and comes into the wider metaphysis, it may follow an unwished trajectory. There is also a chance for malreduction in diapyhseal fractures. The more complex the fracture is, the more difficult its reduction, not only for the alignment of the proximal or the distal part of bone in relation to the diaphysis, but also correct rotation and length. In this paper, we analyze recommended techniques to achieve accurate bone fracture reduction, to avoid post-operative deformities combined with correct implant insertion.

Resuscitation of Polytrauma Patients: The Management of Massive Skeletal Bleeding.

The term 'severely injured patient' is often synonymous of polytrauma patient, multiply-injured patient or, in some settings, polyfractured patient. Together with brain trauma, copious bleeding is the most severe complication of polytrauma. Consequently hypotension develop. Then, the perfusion of organs may be compromised, with the risk of organ failure. Treatment of chest bleeding after trauma is essential and is mainly addressed via surgical manoeuvres. As in the case of lesions to the pelvis, abdomen or extremities, this approach demonstrates the application of damage control (DC). The introduction of sonography has dramatically changed the diagnosis and prognosis of abdominal bleeding. In stable patients, a contrast CT-scan should be performed before any x-ray projection, because, in an emergency situation, spinal or pelvic fractures be missed by conventional radiological studies. Fractures or dislocation of the pelvis causing enlargement of the pelvic cavity, provoked by an anteroposterior trauma, and in particular cases presenting vertical instability, are the most severe types and require fast stabilisation by closing the pelvic ring diameter to normal dimensions and by stabilising the vertical shear. Controversy still exists about whether angiography or packing should be used as the first choice to address active bleeding after pelvic ring closure. Pelvic angiography plays a significant complementary role to pelvic packing for final haemorrhage control. Apart from pelvic trauma, fracture of the femur is the only fracture provoking acute life-threatening bleeding. If possible, femur fractures should be immobilised immediately, either by external fixation or by a sheet wrap around both extremities.

Should hip fractures be operated upon only by specialist hip unit surgeons in order to lower rates of surgical site infection?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of hip fractures treated by orthopaedic surgeons, performed by specialist vs. non-specialist surgeons. The rate of surgical site infection (SSI) obtained is taken as the main variable. METHODS: This was a prospective controlled cohort study of 814 patients presenting with hip fractures, operated on by a group of orthopaedic surgeons within the same hospital department. Patients were classified according to whether the surgeons belonged to a specialist hip unit (group A = 212 cases) or not (group B = 602 cases). RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression showed that there was no relation between gender, SSI, Charlson's index, preoperative period, surgical technique or study groups (A or B). Only age was a determinant factor (rank-sum test p = 0.03; OR 95% CI = 1.07, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Since there were no differences in the SSI outcome between surgeons working in a specialist hip unit and the general orthopaedic surgeons, delaying operative treatment for hip fractures to enable treatment in such a unit or creating a new unit of this type is not necessary. In this respect, the only significant variable is the patient's age.

Is there still a place for continuous closed irrigation in the management of periprosthetic total knee infection?

In recent decades, many technical improvements have been achieved in the use of prosthetic joints, and the risk of infection has been greatly reduced, to current rates of 0.4-2.0% following primary knee replacement. However, the increasing rate of joint replacements being performed means that the absolute number of such infections remains significant and poses substantial costs to healthcare systems worldwide. Accordingly, further strategies to treat and prevent total joint infections should be investigated. Infections following knee replacements can compromise the function and durability of arthroplasty. When these infections occur during the immediate postoperative period, irrigation and debridement with component retention can be attempted to salvage the implant. This is an attractive, cheap, low-morbidity treatment for periprosthetic knee infection. However, the results published regarding this procedure are uneven; some studies report the eradication of prosthetic joint infection by debridement alone in 70-90% of cases but conversely, others have reported a high failure rate for this procedure, averaging 68% (61-82%). The difference could be attributed in part to the multiplicity of variables that may influence the success of the procedure. One such is that of treatment with a continuous irrigation system, which has the theoretical advantage of enabling the administration of antimicrobial agents, as well as the drainage of debris and blood clots. The objective of this study is to elucidate the overall efficacy of irrigation and debridement with prosthesis retention in infected total knee arthroplasty and to determine whether the addition of a continuous irrigation system influences this efficacy.

The diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

Periprosthetic infection (PJI) is the most serious joint replacement complication, occurring in 0.8-1.9% of knee arthroplasties and 0.3-1.7% of hip arthroplasties. A definition of PJI was proposed in the November 2011 issue of the journal Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. The presence of a fistula or of local inflammatory signs is indicative of PJI, but in many cases local pain is the only symptom. In the absence of underlying inflammatory conditions, C-reactive protein measurement is the most useful preoperative blood test for detecting infection associated with a prosthetic joint. The most useful preoperative diagnostic test is the aspiration of synovial joint fluid to obtain a total and differential cell count and culture. Intraoperative frozen sections of periprosthetic tissues produce excellent accuracy in predicting a diagnosis of PJI but only moderate accuracy in ruling out the diagnosis. In this process, obtaining a quality sample is the first step, and determines the quality of microbiological results. Specimens for culture should be obtained prior to the initiation of antibiotic treatment. Sonication of a removed implant may increase the culture yield. Plain radiography has low sensitivity and low specificity for detecting infection associated with a prosthetic joint. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in the evaluation of complex cases, but metal inserts interfere with these tests, and abnormalities may be non-specific. Labelled-leucocyte imaging (e.g., leucocytes labelled with indium-111) combined with bone marrow imaging with the use of technetium-99m-labelled sulphur colloid is considered the imaging test of choice when imaging is necessary.

Management of calcaneal fractures: what have we learnt over the years?

Calcaneal fractures result, in many cases, in, subtalar joint stiffness and severe disability. Diagnosis is usually made by X-ray, but more accurately by a computed tomography (CT) scan. In the last years, much has been known regarding its physiopathology and osteosynthesis. Although new developments in osteosynthesis materials have been made, calcaneus fractures still remains in dispute of those advocating non-operative treatment and those defending open reduction and internal fixation. Less invasive surgery, arthroscopy and three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy are very important for reduction accuracy and soft-tissue damage avoidance. In this article, the physiopathology, diagnosis, classification and treatment of calcaneus fractures are updated. Nevertheless, systematic reviews have shown no evidence about what treatment is better.

How many distal bolts should be used in unreamed intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal tibial fractures?

INTRODUCTION: Unreamed intramedullary nailing (UIMN) is an effective treatment procedure for the majority of tibial fractures, with locking constituting the technical support for the buttressing and neutralisation principles underlying intramedullary nailing. It has been claimed that the added versatility obtained from the use of more bolts in distal locking is very important. Several studies have been made concerning the optimum number of locking bolts in distal tibial fractures; however, to the best of our knowledge, no study has dealt with the question of whether two or three bolts should be used in diaphyseal fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this paper, we evaluate the results of treating 86 diaphyseal tibial fractures (type 42 according to the AO classification) with Expert Tibial UIMN (Synthes™, West Chester, PA, USA) and distal blocking with either two or three bolts. Mean patient age was 35 years (21-51). RESULTS: We found that the consolidation time is shorter, less radiation time is needed and the material cost is lower when two bolts are used. No other differences were found regarding mean operative time, wound healing, pain at fracture site, joint function, angular deviation or rotation. CONCLUSIONS: For type 42 AO tibial fractures treated with Expert Tibial UIMN, distal blocking should be performed with only two bolts.