A randomized study comparing two different schedules of administration of cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial was designed to investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and activity of two different schedules of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced (International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Stage IIIB-IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: From February 1997 to September 1998, 82 patients with advanced NSCLC were entered onto the study and were randomized to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Day 2 (arm A) or Day 15 (arm B) every 28 days. RESULTS: All the patients were assessable for toxicity (arm A/arm B: 151/177 cycles; median, 4 of 5 cycles per patient), and the following Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported (percentage of cycles in arm A vs. arm B): anemia, 7.9% and 2.3% (P < 0.05); leukopenia, 6.0% and 6.7%; thrombocytopenia, 15.0% and 1.6% (P < 0.01); no World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. These side effects led to gemcitabine dose reductions in 35.1% of courses in arm A and 22.0% of courses in arm B (P < 0.05) and to gemcitabine omissions in 28.5% of courses in arm A versus 7.3% of courses in arm B (P < 0.01). Dose intensities (DIs) of gemcitabine were 607.5 mg/m(2)/week in arm A and 711.6 mg/m(2)/week in arm B (P < 0.01); DIs of cisplatin were 18. 1 mg/m(2)/week in arm A and 18.8 mg/m(2)/week in arm B. The total delivered doses of gemcitabine were 9315.5 mg/m(2) in arm A and 12, 631.0 mg/m(2) in arm B (P < 0.01); the total delivered doses of cisplatin were 277.1 mg/m(2) in arm A and 333.0 mg/m(2) in arm B (P < 0.01). Response rates according to intention to treat were 40.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5-55.3) in arm A and 45% (95% CI, 29.5-60.5) in arm B. The overall median duration of response was 7.4 months; the median time to disease progression was 6 months (95% CI, 3-9) in arm A and 9 months (95% CI, 4-14) in arm B (P < 0.02); the median overall survival was 10 months (95% CI, 7.0-12.5) in arm A and 17 months (95% CI, 13.0-21.6) in arm B (P < 0.01); the 1-year survival rates were 34% and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that arm B (cisplatin on Day 15) is less toxic than arm A (cisplatin on Day 2) and allows the administration of significantly higher total doses and dose intensities of chemotherapy. No significant differences in response rates were observed between the two schedules; patients on arm B experienced a significantly more prolonged progression free and overall survival; however, the study was not powered to detect differences in these outcomes.

Gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This trial investigated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in previously untreated elderly (> 70 years) patients with advanced (stage IIIB-IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 to July 1998, 46 patients with advanced NSCLC aged over 70 years with a performance status of 0-2 were entered into the study. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered as a 30-min infusion once a week for 3 weeks followed by a week of rest; cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable for response. One complete response and nine partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 22.2% (95% C.I.: 11.3-37.5). The median time to disease progression was 5.1 months (95% C.I.: 3.5-6.7), the median duration of response was 6.3 months, and the median overall survival time 6.75 months (95% C.I.: 5.3-8.2). All patients were evaluable for toxicity (184 cycles, median = 3 cycles/patient) and no grade 4 hematologic toxicities were reported. WHO grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia and anemia occurred in 3.3, 0.5 and 1.1% of cycles, respectively. Grade 3 skin rash occurred in 4.3% of patients. These side effects led to treatment discontinuation in two patients. CONCLUSION: Our data show that gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in patients aged over 70 years with advanced NSCLC.

Intrahepatic chemotherapy with floxuridine, leucovorin and dexamethasone in continuous infusion and mitomycin-C bolus in unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic continuous infusion FUDR induces a 50% response rate in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Lower rates have been observed in pretreated patients. The combination of floxuridine plus leucovorin has obtained over 70% responses, with high hepatic toxicity. The use of dexamethasone can decrease hepatic toxicity. A randomized study reported an increase in response rate and a decrease in hepatic toxicity in a group of patients treated with floxuridine plus dexamethasone compared to a group receiving only floxuridine. Moreover, the combination of mitomycin C, carmustine and floxuridine is also effective in pretreated patients. METHODS: On such premises, since July 1993 we have treated 39 patients affected by unresectable hepatic metastases from colon carcinoma (26 patients) and rectal carcinoma (13 patients) with the combination continuous infusion of floxuridine (0.20 mg/kg per day) + leucovorin (7.5 mg/m2/day) + dexamethasone (20 mg on days 1 to 14) and bolus mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 on day 1) via the hepatic artery. Cycles were administered every four weeks. There were as 28 males and 11 females, with a median age of 64 years (range, 39-75) and a median PS = 0. Twenty-two patients were pretreated with systemic chemotherapy including 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Total number of cycles was 189, with a median of 6 cycles per patient (range, 1-12). RESULTS: Of 39 patients 37 were assessable for response (2 patients were not assessable because they stopped chemotherapy for occlusion of the catheter after the first cycle). There were 3 complete responses (1 in a naive patient and 2 in pretreated patients), 16 partial responses (11 in pretreated patients and 5 in chemonaive patients), 4 minor responses, 4 stable disease and 10 progressive disease. The overall response rate was 51.3% (95 Cl, 51.3-86.7%). Median time to progression was 6 months (range, 1-34+). Overall survival was 18 months (range, 1-34+). Of 39 patients, 36 were assessable for toxicity (WHO) (3 patients died after the first cycle for progression of disease): diarrhea and nausea-vomiting grade 3-4 occurred respectively in 15 (41%) and 3 patients (8%); hepatic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment we used showed an elevated activity in liver metastases from colorectal cancer even in patients pretreated and resistant to systemic chemotherapy, although toxicity grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in approximately 40% of the patients.

Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: analysis of acute and chronic toxicity.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate acute and chronic toxicity of combined postoperative standard radiation therapy to the pelvis and 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole in resectable rectal cancer. METHODS: Between July 1990 and September 1993, 58 patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum entered the prospective study. The schedule consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 450 mg/m2 i.v. for 5 days, and from day 28 5-fluorouracil, 450 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 24 weeks, plus levamisole given orally at the dose of 150 mg every day for 3 days every 2 weeks for 6 months; radiotherapy (180 cGy/day) 5 days a week for a total dose of 45 Gy was administered from day 28. RESULTS: After the first cycle of chemotherapy (before radiotherapy), overall toxicity was mild. During chemoradiotherapy, dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 diarrhea and proctitis, for which the combined treatment was interrupted for more than 7 cumulative days in 28 patients. During the 24 weeks of weekly 5-fluorouracil (after radiotherapy), no severe toxicity was reported. Three-year survival and progression-free survival were 65% and 50-55%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is usually feasible, in our study toxicity was severe in a substantial proportion of patients, probably due to the schedule applied. We are evaluating the feasibility and toxicity of a combined treatment which includes 5-fluorouracil in continuous chronomodulated infusion during radiotherapy.

Oral doxifluridine in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapy in elderly patients is an important and under-researched area. Doxifluridine is a fluoropyrimidine derivative and is activated to 5-fluorouracil by uridine phosphorylase, which is more highly expressed in malignant cells. Because of the high bioavailability and low toxicity of oral doxifluridine we conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and activity of a home therapy with oral doxifluridine in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients entered the study: their median ECOG performance status was 1 (0-2) and median age 74 years (69-83), the predominant site of metastasis was liver and all but one of the patients had received no previous chemotherapy. Doxifluridine was given orally at the initial daily total dose of 2250 mg for 4 consecutive days every week. The daily dose was reduced to 1500 mg if toxicities greater than grade 2 (WHO) occurred. RESULTS: Forty-two patients are evaluable for toxicity: treatment was well tolerated, with the most common side effect being diarrhea, severe in 7 (17%) patients (6 grade 3 and 1 grade 4). Thirty-six patients are evaluable for response and 2 complete and 3 partial responses have been observed (response rate 14%; 95% confidence limit interval 5%-29%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a home therapy with oral doxifluridine in elderly advanced colorectal cancer patients is feasible, with a relatively low rate of toxicity, and has moderate activity, comparable to that of intravenous 5-fluorouracil. Therefore, this treatment may be considered for the management of advanced colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Double 5-fluorouracil modulation with folinic acid and recombinant alpha-2B-interferon. A phase I-II study in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Twenty-two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer entered a Phase I-II trial to assess the maximum tolerable dose of alpha-2B-interferon administered intramuscularly three times per week in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 IV for 5 days, and, from day 28, weekly) and folinic acid (200 mg/m2 IV before 5-fluorouracil) and the efficacy of this combination. Diarrhea and mucositis were the most frequent 5-fluorouracil-related toxicities and were > or = ECOG grade 3 in 23% and 18% of patients, respectively. Of 15 patients receiving interferon > or = 9 x 10(6) IU, 10 required interferon dose reduction mostly because of severe fatigue, anorexia, and declining performance status. Among 19 patients evaluable for response, 3 achieved a partial response and 1 a complete response for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval, 6-46%). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that IFN-alpha 2B at doses higher than 6 x 10(6) IU intramuscularly three times per week in the combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid we used is too toxic for the majority of patients; this combination has moderate activity in metastatic colorectal cancer, although similar response rates have been reported, with less toxicity, with 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid without IFN-alpha. A larger Phase III study would be required to determine the value of IFN-alpha in this combination.

Alpha-2B-interferon plus floxuridine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND: Both alpha-interferon and floxuridine are active in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC); the two agents have demonstrated antitumor synergism and different clinical toxicities. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of floxuridine (FUDR), administered as a constant continuous infusion for 14 days every 28 days, in combination with fixed doses of alpha-2B-interferon and to preliminarily evaluate the antitumor activity of this combination. METHODS: Sixteen patients entered the study; six had previously received alpha-interferon. Alpha-2B-interferon was administered at the dose of 10 x 10(6) IU intramuscularly 3 times/week and floxuridine at the starting daily dose of 0.075 mg/kg. This dose was escalated at each subsequent cycle up to dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Most common toxicities included fever and flue-like symptoms, fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, mucositis, and nausea, and 55% of patients experienced greater than or equal to Grade 2 toxicity, mostly diarrhea, for floxuridine doses greater than 0.125 mg/kg/d. Among 15 evaluable patients, 1 achieved a complete response and 4 achieved a partial one (33%; 95% confidence interval, 12-62%). Three partial responses were obtained in patients pretreated with alpha-interferon plus vinblastine. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alpha-2B-interferon and floxuridine is feasible, and in our regimen the recommended daily dose of floxuridine for Phase II studies was 0.125 mg/kg. This combination is active in metastatic renal carcinoma, but further studies are needed to determine whether alpha-2B-interferon has added anything to the FUDR infusion or vice versa.