Management of high-grade papillary Ta or T1 bladder cancer after restaging transurethral resection: A retrospective study comparing Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy upfront versus a third resection.

PURPOSE: Performing restaging transurethral bladder resection (reTURB) for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) reduces the risk of recurrence and tumour understaging. Management of residual high-grade papillary Ta or T1 after reTURB has changed this last 10years in international recommendations. This study aimed to compare the recurrence free survival according to the different management procedures performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent reTURB for initial high-risk NMIBC between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients with residual high-grade papillary Ta or T1 tumour after reTURB were divided into two groups: BCG instillations upfront versus BCG following a third-look resection (3TURB). Patient and tumour characteristics, BCG instillations, recurrence-free survival were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: A total of 162 high-risk patients were included. Sixty-one (37.7%) had residual high-grade papillary Ta or T1 at reTURB: 35 (21.6%) had BCG instillations upfront, 18 (11.2%) had a 3TURB and 8 (5%) had other management. The mean follow-up was 34.2weeks±20.2. Recurrence-free survival was significantly better in patients who underwent BCG instillations upfront (P<0.0043). Recurrence after BCG therapy following reTURB was significantly lower in patients with no residual NMIBC at 6 (92.5% vs. 72.4%, P<0.004) and 12months (85% vs. 67.3%, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of intravesical BCG is compromised in case of residual tumour following TURB. The role of a 3TURB following a positive reTURB is not yet determined. This study has confirmed that residual tumor following reTURB is a negative predictive factor but could not demonstrate the value of a 3TURB compared to upfront BCG.

Management of long ureteral stenosis: Alternatives to indwelling ureteral stents.

OBJECTIF: Evaluate kidney autotransplantation (KAT) and ileal ureter substitution (IUS) practice and outcome as alternatives to indwelling ureteral stents for the management of long ureteral stenosis (US). MATERIAL: We included all patients treated for US with KAT or IUS in 5 French university urology centers between 2010 and 2018. We excluded US due to urothelial carcinoma. Primary endpoint was the preservation of ipsilateral kidney and renal function without any urinary diversion. RESULTS: 22 patients were treated with KAT (n=8, 36.4%) and IUS (n=14, 63.6%). Mean US length was 4.6cm and 6cm (P=0.52) in KAT and IUS groups respectively. US etiologies were lithiasis, iatrogenic, retroperitoneal fibrosis or extrinsic compression. US level was varied. The surgery was described as difficult because of peritoneal adhesions or major peri-ureteral fibrosis. Mean operating time and hospital stay were 336 and 346minutes (P=0.87) and 8 and 15 days respectively (P=0.001). Postoperative complications were mostly Clavien ≤2 (n=17, 77.3%). Revision surgery was required in the KAT group in 3 cases (37.5%), for textiles, renal vein thrombosis and anastomotic leak, none in the IUS group. The mean follow-up was 15.7 months. All but one (in the KAT group) ipsilateral kidneys were preserved, without renal function impairment (Δcreat +2.1 vs. +2.4µmol/l respectively, P=0.67), nor urinary diversion. CONCLUSION: KAT and IUS are safe alternatives whose indication depends on surgeons expertise. Our study pointed out the scarcity of this practice suggesting the need to refer patients to expert centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Renal cell carcinoma of the kidney transplant: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : Carcinome à cellules rénales du transplant rénal.

OBJECTIVE: To propose recommendations for the management of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) of the renal transplant. METHOD: Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU to evaluate prevalence, diagnosis and management of RCC arousing in the renal transplant. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with levels of evidence. RESULTS: Renal cell carcinomas of the renal transplant affect approximately 0.2% of recipients. Mostly asymptomatic, these tumors are mainly diagnosed on a routine imaging of the renal transplant. Predominant pathology is clear cell carcinomas but papillary carcinomas are more frequent than in general population (up to 40-50%). RCC of the renal transplant is often localized, of low stage and low grade. According to tumor characteristics and renal function, preferred treatment is radical (transplantectomy) or nephron sparing through partial nephrectomy (open or minimally invasive approach) or thermoablation after percutaneous biopsy. Although no robust data support a switch of immunosuppressive regimen, some authors suggest to favor the use of mTOR inhibitors. CTAFU does not recommend a mandatory waiting time after transplantectomy for RCC in candidates for a subsequent renal tranplantation when tumor stage

[Renal cell carcinoma in candidates for renal transplantation and recipients of a kidney transplant: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : carcinome rénal sur reins natifs chez le patient transplanté rénal ou en attente de transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To define guidelines for the management of renal cell carcinoma of the native kidney (NKRCC) in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients candidates for renal transplantation. METHOD: A review of the literature following a systematic approach (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU to report renal cell carcinoma epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and management in KTx candidates and recipients. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with the corresponding levels of evidence. RESULTS: ESRD patients are at higher risk of RCC with a standardized incidence ratio of approximately 4,5 as compared with general population. NKRCC tumors occur in 1 to 3 % of KTx recipients with a 10 to 15-fold increased risk as compared with general population, especially in patients with acquired multicystic kidney disease. Most authors suggest yearly monitoring of the native kidneys using ultrasound imaging. Radical nephrectomy (either open or laparoscopic approach) is the preferred treatment of NKRCC in KTx recipients and RCC in ESRD. Surveillance in a valid option in small or cystic renal masses. In the localized setting, change in immunosuppressive therapy is not recommended besides perioperative avoidance of mTOR inhibitor to limit morbidity. CTAFU does not recommend a mandatory waiting time after nephrectomy for RCC in ESRD patients candidates for renal tranplantation when tumor stage

[Urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients and candidates: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : carcinome urothélial chez le patient transplanté rénal et le candidat à la transplantation rénale.

OBJECTIVE: To propose surgical recommendations for urothelial carcinoma management in kidney transplant recipients and candidates. METHOD: A review of the literature (Medline) following a systematic approcah was conducted by the CTAFU regarding the epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and treatment of urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients and candidates for renal transplantation. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with levels of evidence. RESULTS: Urothelial carcinomas occur in the renal transplant recipient population with a 3-fold increased incidence as compared with general population. While major risk factors for urothelial carcinomas are similar to those in the general population, aristolochic acid nephropathy and BK virus infection are more frequent risk factors in renal transplant recipients. As compared with general population, NMIBC in the renal transplant recipients are associated with earlier and higher recurrence rate. The safety and efficacy of adjuvant intravesical therapies have been reported in retrospective series. Treatment for localized MIBC in renal transplant recipients is based on radical cystectomy. In the candidate for a kidney transplant with a history of urothelial tumor, it is imperative to perform follow-up cystoscopies according to the recommended frequency, depending on the risk of recurrence and progression of NMIBC and to maintain this follow-up at least every six months up to transplantation whatever the level of risk of recurrence and progression. Based on current data, the present recommendations propose guidelines for waiting period before active wait-listing renal transplant candidates with a history of urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The french recommendations from CTAFU should contribute to improve the management of urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant patients and renal transplant candidates by integrating both oncologic objectives and access to transplantation.

[Use of antiplatelet therapy and direct oral anticoagulants in candidates for renal transplantation: The French guidelines from the CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : agents antiplaquettaires et anticoagulants oraux directs en transplantation rénale.

OBJECTIVE: To define guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy (AT) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in candidates for kidney allotransplantation. METHOD: A review of the medical literature following a systematic approach was conducted by the CTAFU to report the use of AT and DOAC before major surgery and in the setting of advanced chronic kidney disease, defining their managment prior to kidney transplantation with the corresponding level of evidence. RESULTS: DOAC are not recommended in patients under dialysis. Aspirin therapy, but not anti-P2Y12 and DOAC, may be maintained during renal transplantation. Anti-P2Y12 and DOAC should not be use in patients awaiting a kidney transplant, except when a living donor is scheduled, therefore authorizing treatment interruption in optimal conditions. Further data regarding DOAC reversion and monitoring may improve their use in this setting. Global level of evidence is weak. CONCLUSION: These French recommendations should contribute to improve surgical management of kidney transplant candidates exposed to AT or DOA.

[Localized Prostate cancer in candidates for renal transplantation and recipients of a kidney transplant: The French Guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : cancer de la prostate localisé chez le patient transplanté rénal ou en attente de transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To define guidelines for the management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) in kidney transplant (KTx) candidates and recipients. METHOD: A systematic review (Medline) of the literature was conducted by the CTAFU to report prostate cancer epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and management in KTx candidates and recipients with the corresponding level of evidence. RESULTS: KTx recipients are at similar risk for PCa as general population. Thus, PCa screening in this setting is defined according to global French guidelines from CCAFU. Systematic screening is proposed in candidates for renal transplant over 50 y-o. PCa diagnosis is based on prostate biopsies performed after multiparametric MRI and preventive antibiotics. CCAFU guidelines remain applicable for PCa treatment in KTx recipients with some specificities, especially regarding lymph nodes management. Treatment options in candidates for KTx need to integrate waiting time and access to transplantation. Current data allows the CTAFU to propose mandatory waiting times after PCa treatment in KTx candidates with a weak level of evidence. CONCLUSION: These French recommendations should contribute to improve PCa management in KTx recipients and candidates, integrating oncological objectives with access to transplantation.

[Living donor nephrectomy: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : néphrectomie pour don de rein.

OBJECTIVE: To propose surgical recommendations for living donor nephrectomy. METHOD: Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU regarding functional and anatomical assessment of kidney donors, including which side the kidney should be harvested from. Distinct surgical techniques and approaches were evaluated. References were considered with a predefined process to propose recommendations with the corresponding levels of evidence. RESULTS: The recommendations clarify the legal and regulatory framework for kidney donation in France. A rigorous assessment of the donor is one of the essential prerequisites for donor safety. The impact of nephrectomy on kidney function needs to be anticipated. In case of modal vascularization of both kidneys without a relative difference in function or urologic abnormality, removal of the left kidney is the preferred choice to favor a longer vein. Mini-invasive approaches for nephrectomy provide faster donor recovery, less donor pain and shorter hospital stay than open surgery. CONCLUSION: These French recommendations must contribute to improving surgical management of candidates for kidney donation.

[Urinary stones in renal transplant recipients and donors: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : lithiase urinaire chez le receveur ou le donneur en transplantation rénale.

OBJECTIVE: To define guidelines for the management of kidney stones in kidney transplant (KTx) donor or recipients. METHOD: Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU to report kidney stone epidemiology, diagnosis and management in KTx donors and recipients with the corresponding level of evidence. RESULTS: Prevalence of kidney stones in deceased donor is unknown but reaches 9.3% in living donors in industrialized countries. Except in Maastrich 2 donors, diagnosis is done on systematic pre-donation CT scan according to standard french procedure. No prospective study has compared therapeutic strategies available for the management of kidney stones in KTx donor: ureteroscopy or an extra corporeal lithotripsy in case of living donor prior to donation, ex vivo approach (pyelotomy or ureteroscopy), ureterocopy in the KTx recipient or surveillance. De novo kidney stones result from a lithogenesis process to be identified and treated in order to avoid recurrences. The context of solitary functional kidney renders the prevention of recurrence of great importance. Diagnosis is suspected when identification of a renal graft dysfunction, hematuria or urinary tract infection with renal pelvis dilatation. Stone size and location are determined by computed tomography. There are no prospective, controlled studies on kidney stone management in the KTx. The therapeutic strategies are similar to standard management in general population. CONCLUSION: These French recommendations should contribute to improve kidney stones management in KTx donor and recipients.

[Indocyanine green fluorescence to visualize the ureteric vascularization of kidney transplants: An exploratory study]. / Visualiser la vascularisation urétérale des transplants rénaux par fluorescence au vert d'indocyanine : étude exploratoire.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary complications after kidney transplantation are common and can compromise renal function. While they are mainly attributed to ischemic lesions of the ureter, there is no existing method to evaluate its vascularization during surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate if indocyanine green, revealed by infra-red light andused to visualize tissue perfusion, could provide an appreciation of the ureter's vascularization during kidney transplantation. METHODS: This feasibility study was conducted over one month, on eleven consecutive kidney transplants. During transplantation, an injection of indocyanine green enabled the surgeon to visualize in real time with an infra-red camera the ureter fluorescence. Its intensity was reported on a qualitative and semi-quantitative scale. Occurrence of urinary complications such as stenosis or ureteral fistula were collected during 6 months. RESULTS: In all of the 11 cases (100%), the last centimeters of the ureters were not fluorescent. Three (27%) ureters were poorly or partiallly fluorescent. Out of these three cases, only one case of urinary fistula occurred, followed by ureteric stenosis. In the series, two fistulas (18%) and two ureteric stenoses (18%) occurred. No side effects were observed. The low number of events did not allow statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: Infra-red fluorescence of indocyanine green could be a simple and innovative way to appreciate the transplant's ureteric vascularization during kidney transplantation. It could help surgeons to identify the level of ureter section and to decide the anastomosis technique, in order to limit urinary complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Smooth muscle of the male pelvic floor: An anatomic study.

Knowledge of the anatomy of the male pelvic floor is important to avoid damaging the pelvic floor muscles during surgery. We set out to explore the structure and innervation of the smooth muscle (SM) of the whole pelvic floor using male fetuses. We removed en-bloc the entire pelvis of three male fetuses. The specimens were serially sectioned before being stained with Masson's trichrome and hematoxylin and eosin, and immunostained for SMs, and somatic, adrenergic, sensory and nitrergic nerve fibers. Slides were digitized for three-dimensional reconstruction. We individualized a middle compartment that contains SM cells. This compartment is in close relation with the levator ani muscle (LAM), rectum, and urethra. We describe a posterior part of the middle compartment posterior to the rectal wall and an anterior part anterior to the rectal wall. The anterior part is split into (1) a centro-levator area of SM cells localized between the right and left LAM, (2) an endo-levator area that upholsters the internal aspect of the LAM, and (3) an infra-levator area below the LAM. All these areas are innervated by autonomic nerves coming from the inferior hypogastric plexus. The core and the infra-levator area receive the cavernous nerve and nerves supplying the urethra. We thus demonstrate that these muscular structures are smooth and under autonomic influence. These findings are relevant for the pelvic surgeon, and especially the urologist, during radical prostatectomy, abdominoperineal resection and intersphincteric resection. Clin. Anat., 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Is sarcopenia a morbi-mortality factor in the treatment of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer?] / La sarcopénie est-elle un facteur de morbi-mortalité dans le traitement des tumeurs localisées de la vessie infiltrant le muscle ?

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia evaluated from the measurement of skeletal muscle index (SMI) has been evaluated as a predictive factor of morbidity and mortality after surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether it was predictive of morbidity and mortality in patients managed by cystectomy or tri-modality therapy (TMT), combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy after endoscopic resection of the tumour, for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 146 consecutive patients from 2 university hospital centres treated by cystectomy between January 2012 and April 2017 or TMT between October 2008 and October 2014 were included. The SMI was measured on axial computed-tomography at the level of the transverse process of L3, before treatment. Sarcopenia was assessed in two ways: either by SMI without muscle mass adjustment or according to the definition by Martin and al. based on gender and patient BMI, then called "adjusted sarcopenia". The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) for sarcopenia. The secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival without re-admission (SRH) for the total population and for each treatment group. Survival analyses were performed using the Cox model. The association between sarcopenia and complications has been investigated by the Chi2 test. RESULTS: The characteristics of sarcopenic (n=67) and non-sarcopenic (n=79) patients were comparable except for 2 criteria: older patients in the sarcopenic group and a higher proportion of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in non-sarcopenic patients. Sarcopenia was not significantly associated with any type of survival. Sarcopenia was not associated with the proportion or severity of complications. CONCLUSION: Unlike unadjusted SMI, sarcopenia was not associated with survival or complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Is it necessary to perform urine culture systematically prior to double J ureteral stent removal?] / Est-il nécessaire de faire systématiquement un ECBU avant l'ablation d'une sonde double J ?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of systematic urine culture before ureteric double j removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective audit was performed to assess the validity of our current clinical practice. A cohort of informed patients without clinical signs of urinary tract infection and without predefined risk factors were programmed for ureteral double j stent removal in an outpatient setting. Urine was sampled for culture immediately before the procedure. Patients had to complete a self-questionnaire 15 days following stent removal, inquiring about tolerance and complications which were to be analyzed according to the culture results. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of febrile urinary tract infection. RESULTS: Among the 56 participants, immediate preoperative urine culture revealed colonization in 9 patients (16.1%) and contamination in 6 patients (10.7%). A significant association was found between bacteriuria and double j placement following surgery with urinary tract injury (P<0.02) and diabetes (P<0.009). Two patients had fever including a man with sterile urine and a woman with Staphylococcus Aureus infection. No hospitalization was necessary. Twelve patients reported functional signs with lumbar pain being the most common. There was no significant association between functional signs and patients' clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: This evaluation was not in favor of modifying our protocol of care i.e. the lack of performing neither antibiotic prophylaxis nor systematic urine culture before JJ ureteral stent removal in a selected population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Management of renal transplant urolithiasis: a multicentre study by the French Urology Association Transplantation Committee.

PURPOSE: Urolithiasis is rare among renal transplant recipients and its management has not been clearly defined. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective study was organised by the Comité de Transplantation de l'Association Française d'Urologie (French Urology Association transplantation committee). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19 software. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included in this study. Renal transplant urolithiasis was an incidental finding in 55% of cases, mostly on a routine follow-up ultrasound examination. One half of symptomatic stones were due to urinary tract infection and the other half were due to an episode of acute renal failure. The initial management following diagnosis of urolithiasis was double J stenting (27%), nephrostomy tube placement (21%), or watchful waiting (52%). Definitive management consisted of: watchful waiting (48%), extracorporeal lithotripsy (13%), rigid or flexible ureteroscopy (26%), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (11%) and surgical pyelotomy (2%). All transplants remained functional following treatment of the stone. The main limitation is the retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of lithiasis could be higher in kidney transplanted patients due to a possible anatomical or metabolical abnormalities. The therapeutic management of renal transplant urolithiasis appears to be comparable to that of native kidney urolithiasis.

Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Urinary Complications After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Only surgically irrelevant risk factors including sex, African-American ancestry, or exceptional U-stitch anastomosis have been identified to associate with urinary complications after kidney transplantation. The objective was to identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors associated with urinary complications after kidney transplantation. METHODS: A single-center study of 3,129 kidney transplants performed over 40 years was conducted to identify independent risk factors using χ2 tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified the quality of the transplant's ureter, cystographic abnormalities in the recipient, and repeat transplantations as independent risk factors for overall urinary complications occurring after kidney transplantation in multivariable analysis. Obesity was associated with an increased risk of urinary fistula, while the presence of a JJ stent was associated with a reduced risk of urinary fistula. The risk of urinary surgical complications for kidney transplantations was reduced when the kidney was recovered from a living related compared to a deceased donor. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors identified in the present study will allow candidates for kidney transplantation to be more informed and will also allow for surgical modifications to limit the occurrence of urinary complications.

Prostate biopsies: Available technique, approaches and diagnostic accuracy.

Despite advances in the diagnosis of prostate cancer over the past century, it remains a leading cause of cancer related death. A recent recommendation against screening has further complicated the diagnosis and management of this condition. It remains to be demonstrated if newer diagnostic modalities will have an impact on mortality rates. Most certainly, not all prostate cancers need to be diagnosed, and methods of accurately diagnosing those cancers that lead to death needs more work. In this review article, we describe the different techniques, approaches and diagnostic accuracies of the currently used biopsy methods.

[Deep infiltrating endometriosis surgical management and pelvic nerves injury]. / Identification des sites anatomiques à risque de lésion nerveuse lors de chirurgie pour endométriose pelvienne profonde.

OBJECTIVES: Deep pelvic endometriosis surgery may need substantial excisions, which in turn expose to risks of injury to the pelvic nerves. To limit functional complications, nerve-sparing surgical techniques have been developed but should be adapted to the specific multifocal character of endometriotic lesions. The objective was to identify the anatomical areas where the pelvic nerves are most at risk of injury during endometriotic excisions. METHODS: The Medline and Embase databases have been searched for available literature using the keywords "hypogastric nerve or hypogastric plexus [Mesh] or autonomic pathway [Mesh], anatomy, endometriosis, surgery [Mesh]". All relevant French and English publications, selected based on their available abstracts, have been reviewed. Five female adult fresh cadavers have been dissected to localize the key anatomical areas where the pelvic nerves are most at risk of injury. RESULTS: Six anatomical areas of high risk for pelvic nerves have been identified, analysed and described. Pelvic nerves can be damaged during the dissection of retrorectal space and the anterolateral rectal excision. Furthermore, before an uterosacral ligament excision, a parametrial excision, a colpectomy or a dissection of the vesico-uterine ligament, the hypogastric nerves, splanchnic nerves, inferior hypogastric plexus and its efferent pathways must be mapped out to avoid injury. The distance between the deep uterin vein and the pelvic splanchnic nerves were measured on four cadavers and varied from 2.5cm to 4cm. CONCLUSION: Six key anatomical pitfalls must be known in order to limit the functional complications of the endometriotic surgical excision. Applying nerve-sparing surgical techniques for endometriosis would lead to less urinary functional complications and a better short-term postoperative satisfaction.