ABSTRACT
Aquaculture is an activity with economic and social importance since it generates food, employment, and income. However, like other human activities, it negatively impacts the environment, in this respect mainly due to the production of effluents rich in sedimentable solids, organic matter, phosphorus, and nitrogen. These last two are responsible for the eutrophication of water courses, causing changes in the aquatic biota. Hence, there is a need to adopt strategies to improve the efficiency of wastewater reuse. In this sense, the objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of using the floating aquatic macrophytes Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, and Salvinia molesta for the treatment of aquaculture effluents. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design, with seven treatments and three repetitions; the treatments were the following: T1, without plant, treated only with sedimentation; T2, Eichhornia crassipes; T3, Pistia stratiotes; T4, Salvinia molesta; T5, Eichhornia crassipes and Pistia stratiotes; T6, Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia molesta; and T7, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta. The treatments were evaluated for a period of 168 h: the first collection of effluent allowed analysis of the raw effluent; the second occurred 24 h after the first collection and the others, on alternate days with 72, 120, and 168 h, totaling five collections in each experimental unit. The effluent used came from breeding tanks of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The quality of the effluent was evaluated by the rate of removal of nutrients N-total, N-nitrite, N-nitrate, N-ammoniacal and Ptotal, temperature, pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, total alkalinity, BDO, and CDO. After the effluent was treated, the values of the parameters were compared with the maximum admissible values (MAVs), as specified by Brazil's National Environmental Council (CONAMA) in Resolutions 430/2011 and 357/2005. With the use of floating aquatic macrophytes, the concentrations of all evaluated limnology parameters improved significantly. There was also an improvement in the physical aspect of the effluent (transparency and turbidity). Thus, it can be concluded that the use of the macrophytes Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, and Salvinia molesta is effective in the treatment of effluents from fish farming.
Subject(s)
Araceae , Eichhornia , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Aquaculture , Biodegradation, Environmental , Humans , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysisABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: This study aimed to determining the manner in which salinity influenced the growth of the macroalgae Gracilaria birdiae, with the objective of identifying its tolerance limits to this abiotic variable. The specimens were submitted to nutrient-enriched water of varying salinities (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 ppt) for a 30-day period. Initially, under extreme salinity conditions (0 and 60 ppt) the growth of the G. birdiae suffered a negative impact. The macroalgae biomass exposed to 0 and 10 ppt salinities showed a reduction from day six until the experiment was completed. The macroalgae biomass exposed to salinities 20, 30, 40, and 50 ppt showed an increase, with no significant differences between the four treatments. This suggested that this salinity range was comfortable for this species to develop. We concluded that salinity is a crucial parameter which controls the growth of the G. birdiae. This seaweed was negatively influenced when exposed to values equal to or below 10 ppt and equal to 60 ppt, demonstrating good tolerance to salinities of 20, 30, 40 and 50 ppt.
RESUMO: Objetivamos com o presente trabalho avaliar os efeitos da salinidade sobre o crescimento da macroalga Gracilaria birdiae, visando identificar os seus limites de tolerância a esta variável abiótica. Os exemplares foram submetidos a água com salinidades 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 e 60 ppt enriquecida com nutrientes por um período de 30 dias. Inicialmente a G. birdiae foi negativamente afetada em condições de salinidades extremas (0 e 60 ppt). A biomassa das macroalgas expostas a salinidade 0 e 10 ppt declinou a partir do 6º dia até o final do experimento. Houve aumento na biomassa das macroalgas expostas as salinidades 20, 30, 40 e 50 ppt, não apresentando diferenças significativas entre estes quatro tratamentos, sugerindo este intervalo de salinidade como sendo ótimo para o desenvolvimento desta espécie. Concluímos que a salinidade é um parâmetro importante para controlar o crescimento da G. birdiae, sendo afetada negativamente quando exposta a valores igual ou menor que 10 ppt e igual a 60 ppt, possuindo tolerância às salinidades de 20, 30, 40 e 50 ppt.
ABSTRACT
Este estudo avaliou o desempenho zootécnico do camarão marinho Litopenaeus vannamei em diferentes tipos de substratos não consolidados. Juvenis (0,97 ± 0,27 g) foram aclimatados na densidade de 52 m-2, em 21 caixas de polietileno com biofiltros individuais, em um sistema fechado de filtração contínua, sendo submetidos aos tratamentos: 1) A = 25% silte + 25% argila + 25% areia muito fina + 25% areia fina; 2) B = 50% areia fina + 50% areia muito fina e 3) Controle = sem substrato, em um delineamento experimental completamente casualizado, com três tratamentos e sete repetições cada. Os animais foram alimentados com 12% da biomassa/dia com ração peletizada (35% de proteína bruta), ofertada em bandejas e parcelada em duas ofertas diárias (8 e 16h). O estudo teve duração de 48 dias, sendo avaliados: consumo aparente de ração, eficiência alimentar, taxa de crescimento específico, sobrevivência e ganho de peso. Foram acompanhados diariamente salinidade, pH, amônia e temperatura da água. A análise estatística dos dados se deu por meio dos testes Anova ou Kuskal-Wallis, em função da sua parametricidade. Não foram observadas diferenças significativas com relação aos fatores avaliados nas diferentes granulometrias de sedimento testadas, indicando que estas não exerceram influência sobre o desempenho zootécnico de L. vannamei juvenil.
This study aimed to evaluate the zootechnical performance of Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp at different types of unconsolidated substrate. Juvenile shrimp (0.97 ± 0.27 g) were acclimatized, in a stocking density of 52 m-2, to 21 polyethylene boxes (50 L) connected individually to biofilters in a closed water exchange system. The animals were submitted to the treatments: 1) A = 25% silt + 25% clay + 25% very fine sand + 25% fine sand; 2) B = 50% fine sand + 50% very fine sand and 3) Control = no sediment, with seven replications each. Photoperiod was set on 12L: 12D. Shrimps were fed twice a day (at 08:00 and 16:00h) with 12% total biomass day-1. Food was offered in feeding trays 2 cm from the substrate. The experiment had a duration of 48 days, evaluating: apparent ration intake, food efficiency, specific growth rate, survival and weight gain. During this period, water quality was monitored daily. Data was analyzed by Anova or Kuskal-Wallis test, depending on normality (SigmaStat 3.1, 2004 and STATISTICA 6.0, 2001). There were no differences among groups regarding weight gain, food intake, SGR and survival, indicating that these did not exert influence on the zootechnical performance of L. vannamei juvenil.