Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Poult Sci ; 95(4): 736-48, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26769272

ABSTRACT

Controversy has developed as to whether or not pin-metered water lines or water troughs are more appropriate for Pekin ducks. We hypothesized that water troughs would show improved duck body conditions and environmental quality compared to pin-metered water lines. To test this hypothesis, we housed ducks in 2 barns, one with water lines and one with water troughs. Water troughs were constructed to meet RSPCA guidelines for number and density of ducks and with recently described verandas. Ducks were divided into 4 pens per barn (n=1,000 ducks/pen). The study was then repeated (n=8 pens per water source) in a cross-over design so the barns each contained the opposite water source to the first experiment. We scored the ducks' body condition using an established scoring rubric and analyzed using SAS Proc GLM-Mix as binomial data. Ducks housed with water troughs showed higher (thus worse condition; P<0.001) scores for eyes, nostrils, feather quality, feather cleanliness, and foot pads. We also compared water condition, water quality, and duck mortality using a Student t test for both water sources each week. We found that the water troughs showed higher iron (P<0.001), nitrites (P<0.001), pH (P<0.01), and bacterial growth (P<0.001). The bacterial growth was shown to have higher (P<0.001)E. coli, coliforms, and Staphylococcusin the water troughs. Water lines typically showed no bacterial growth in culture-based assays. Ducks housed with water troughs used greater (P=0.001) volumes of water compared to ducks housed with water lines. Ducks with water troughs also showed a greater percent (P=0.008) mortality at all ages compared to ducks with water lines. These data suggest that water troughs may not be beneficial for duck welfare and could adversely impact both environment and duck or human health.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Drinking Water/analysis , Ducks/physiology , Water Quality , Water Supply/methods , Animal Welfare , Animals , Drinking Water/microbiology , Health Status , Indiana , Longevity , Random Allocation
2.
FEMS Microbiol Lett ; 195(1): 85-90, 2001 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11167000

ABSTRACT

Protein interactions among RNA polymerase small subunits from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii were investigated using affinity pulldown assays in pairwise and higher-order combinations. In the most extensive study of archaeal RNA polymerase subunit interactions to date, including 37 pairs of proteins, 10 ternary combinations, and three quaternary combinations, we found evidence for pairwise interactions of subunit D with subunits L and N, and a ternary complex of subunits D, L and N. No other small subunit interactions occurred. These results are consistent with interactions observed in a crystal structure of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II and support a common archaeal/eukaryal RNA polymerase architecture. We further propose that subunit E" is not an integral member of archaeal RNA polymerases. Finally, we discuss the relative accuracy of the various methods that have been used to predict protein-protein interactions in RNA polymerase.


Subject(s)
DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases/chemistry , DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases/metabolism , Methanococcus/enzymology , Blotting, Western , Cloning, Molecular , DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases/genetics , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Eukaryotic Cells/enzymology , Methanococcus/genetics , Structure-Activity Relationship
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...