ABSTRACT
Few protocols have been published for the dental management of patients with head and neck cancer to prevent complications from head and neck radiation therapy. Radiation therapy not only affects the tumor cells targeted, but also the dentition, bone, salivary gland, and oral soft tissue structures. A comprehensive dental evaluation prior to head and neck radiation therapy can help prevent many complications. The following clinical guidelines were established by a workgroup of oral health providers within the Department of Veterans Affairs. This workgroup focused on developing a set of recommendations regarding dental care prior to the initiation of head and neck radiation therapy based on the best clinical evidence and expert consensus. A systematic algorithm was developed for the evaluation including pre-exam data gathering, examination, education, and treatment, followed by maintenance and postradiation dental follow-up. This document is evidence-based, patient-centered, consistent with accepted practices of care and safety, and in accordance with applicable statutes and regulations.
Subject(s)
Dental Care/standards , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Diagnosis, Oral , Humans , Oral Hygiene , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Tooth Diseases/prevention & control , Tooth Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Staff of the VA Office of Dentistry, the dental care arm of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' Veterans Health Administration, developed a performance measure (PM) regarding appropriate fluoride use. The authors hypothesized that after the implementation of this PM, veterans at high risk of experiencing caries would require fewer new dental restorations than in the past. METHODS: In a retrospective longitudinal analysis, the authors evaluated the effectiveness of a PM in reducing restoration rates in veterans at high risk of experiencing caries. They evaluated changes in restoration rates for all eligible veterans, as well as the subpopulation at high risk of experiencing caries (defined as receiving two or more restorations in 12 months) both before and after the implementation of the PM. RESULTS: In 2012, 81 percent of clinics provided fluoride for more than 90 percent of their patients at high risk of experiencing caries. After use of the PM for four years, there were 8.6 percent fewer patients needing two or more restorations, a 10.8 percent decrease in the mean number of restorations and a modest 3.4 percent fewer patients at high risk of experiencing caries who required new restorations after the initial 12-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoride use for patients at high risk of experiencing caries rose from 51.8 percent in 2008 to 93.6 percent in 2012. Restoration rates rose before implementation of the PM and fell consistently after its implementation. Practical Implications Fluoride use reduces the need for future restorations in adults at high risk of experiencing caries.
