Preference or flexibility? Spatial navigation by Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in a multiple-cue environment.

We investigated if and how Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) show flexibility in their use of multiple sources of information in a spatial learning task. In Experiment 1, hamsters were trained to exit an arena through one of three doors. The goal, marked by a beacon, was fixed during the training phase. When the beacon was placed nearer to another door, the hamsters predominantly chose the original door rather than those with the relocated beacon (Tests A and C). The removal of the beacon had little effect on their performance (Test B). In Experiment 2, when we changed the shape of the apparatus to make the positional information of the goals other than the beacon invalid, a few individual subjects used the beacon (Test B'). However, after experiencing the invalidity of such positional information, the original door was less frequently chosen in a rerun of the beacon relocation test (Test C). Finally, in Experiment 3, we confirmed that hamsters could easily learn to use the beacon when it was the sole cue for navigation. These results suggest that, despite hamsters' limited tendency to use a beacon for navigation, they can flexibly use multiple strategies depending on their experience or environmental context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Phylogeny and ontogeny of mental time.

Humans have mental time in our mind, apart from physical time that is a part of system that governs the physical world, and memory is our key cognitive ability for recognizing the passage of time. Recent studies have suggested that the memory system of several nonhuman animals may have an incidental nature, which is also a feature of episodic memory. In addition, apes, which are phylogenetically close to humans, have an ability to remember a single past event. In the case of humans, preverbal infants under the age of two are able to retain long-term memory of a single event and apply it to predict a future event. Thus, nonhuman animals and preverbal human infants both have their own specific mental time travel abilities, and there is a phylogenetic and ontogenic basis of full-fledged mental time travel that can be found in human adults.

Do bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) amodally complete partly occluded lines? An analysis of line classification performance.

Humans perceive a line touching an edge of a large rectangle longer than the reality. Kanizsa (1979) has suggested that this illusion occurs because we perceive that the line is partly "hidden" behind the rectangle and automatically completes it. We tested whether bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) would experience this perceptual phenomenon using a line classification task on the touch monitor, which was used in our previous study with rhesus monkeys and pigeons (Fujita, 2001). We trained three bantams to classify six lengths of black target lines into two categories, "short" or "long," ignoring a gray rectangle (Experiment 1) or a gray area (i.e., a left or a right half of the monitor was filled with gray; Experiment 2) located at the same distance (8 pixels) from the target line. In the test, the gap between the line and the gray rectangle (or area) sometimes changed (0, 4, or 8 pixels; we labeled these stimuli as G0, G4, and G8 respectively). Both of the two successfully trained bantams showed an illusion for G0, but the direction of illusion was reversed; that is, they judged the line in G0 to be "shorter" than that in G4 and G8. Further analyses proved that neither the gaps between the target line and the gray rectangle nor the total widths of the stimuli could account for the bantams' responses. These results suggest that bantams do not complete the "occluded" portion even when identification of its shape is not required.

Do birds (pigeons and bantams) know how confident they are of their perceptual decisions?

Rhesus monkeys are known to recognize confidence about their immediate perceptual and cognitive decisions by using a betting procedure (Son and Kornell in The missing link in cognition: origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 296-320, 2005; Kornell et al. in Psychol Sci 18:64-71, 2007). In this report, we examined whether this ability is shared in two avian species (pigeons and bantams) in order to know how widespread this metacognitive ability is among animals. We trained pigeons and bantams to search for a differently colored disk (target) among others (distracters) displayed on a touch-sensitive monitor. In test, the subjects were required to choose one of two confidence icons, "risk" and "safe", after the visual search. A peck at the "risk" icon after a correct response in the visual search (i.e., a peck at the target) was reinforced by food and light, while that after an incorrect response (i.e., a peck at a distracter) resulted in a timeout. A peck at the "safe" icon was always reinforced by food and light, or by light only, regardless of the visual search result. The percentages of "safe" choices after incorrect responses were higher than after correct responses in all six pigeons and two of three bantams. This behavior generalized to novel stimuli in some subjects, and even to a novel line-classification task in a pigeon. These results suggest that these two distantly related avian species have in common a metacognitive ability that allows them to recognize confidence about their immediate perceptual decisions.

Do bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) experience amodal completion? An analysis of visual search performance.

Whereas many mammals (some primates and mice) experience amodal completion, previous data split for avian species. However, experimental procedures have been quite different among the species, and thus a direct comparison of various avian species in the same experimental situation is needed. We tested whether bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) would complete partly occluded figures using a visual search task on the touch monitor, which was successfully used in our previous study with pigeons. First, we trained 3 participants to search for a notched red diamond (a target) among complete diamonds (distracters). Next, white squares accompanied each figure with a small gap of a fixed size. In test, the location of the accompanying white squares sometimes changed. In some trials, the white squares exactly covered, or "occluded," the notched portion of the target. Humans are known to have great difficulty in finding such targets due to "automatic" completion of the notched part. However, bantams met no such difficulty at all. This result and the demonstration by Forkman (1998) of hens' amodal completion of figures placed on a perspective background, suggest that the perspective cue may have an important role in amodal completion in this species.