Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous, Non-Submerged, Implant Placement Using a Minimally Invasive Hydraulic Technique.

Background and objectives: To evaluate whether sinus augmentation, using a minimally invasive implant device, via a non-submerged surgical approach, might negatively influence the outcome. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by evaluating patients' files, classifying them into two groups. Fifty patients (22 men 28 women) were included in the study, 25 in each group. The use of an implant device based on residual alveolar ridge height for sinus augmentation, radiographic evaluation, insertion torque, membrane perforation, post-operative healing, and a minimum of 12 months follow-up were evaluated. Results: The mean residual alveolar ridge height was 5.4 mm for the non-submerged group and 4.2 mm for the submerged group. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications (including membrane perforations). The mean insertion torque was 45 N/cm for the study group and 20 N/cm for the control group. Complete soft tissue healing was observed within three weeks. Mean bone gain height was 8 mm for the study and 9.3 mm for the control group. All implants osseointegrated after 6-9 months of healing time. Mean follow-up was 17.5 months, range 12-36 months. Marginal bone loss at last follow-up was not statistically significantly different: 1 mm in the non-submerged vs. 1.2 mm in the submerged group. Conclusions: Submerged and non-submerged healing following maxillary sinus augmentation was comparable provided residual alveolar ridge height >5 mm and insertion torque >25 N/cm.

The Feasibility of Flapless Approach to Sinus Augmentation Using an Implant Device Designed According to Residual Alveolar Ridge Height.

Hydraulic sinus lift and augmentation may be successfully performed using a dedicated implant device designed according to residual bone height (RBH). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a flapless surgical approach might negatively influence the outcome. A total of 40 consecutive patients (16 men and 24 women) were included in the study, 20 in each group (minimal flap/control versus flapless/study). Inclusion criteria were ≥ 3 mm RBH, ≥ 6 mm width of the residual alveolar ridge according to preoperative cone beam computerized tomography, and ≥ 8 mm buccopalatal keratinized gingiva for the flapless group. Primary outcome parameters included intraoperative membrane perforation. Secondary outcome parameters included postoperative infection, soft tissue healing, bone gain, and short-term dental implant survival. Mean RBH was 4.6 mm. No intraoperative membrane perforations and no postoperative infections were observed. Mean bone gain height was similar for both groups, at 11 mm. Soft tissue healing was observed within 2 months. In all cases, second-stage surgery allowed generation of at least 2 mm of keratinized gingiva buccally. All implants were osseointegrated at second-stage surgery. The use of a flapless approach to maxillary sinus augmentation using an implant device based on RBH yields predictable results.

Patients perceptions of recovery after maxillary sinus augmentation with a minimally invasive implant device.

OBJECTIVE: Patients' perceptions of recovery following sinus augmentation procedures have scarcely been documented. The aim of the present prospective pilot clinical study was to evaluate the patient's perception of immediate postoperative recovery after sinus augmentation, using a minimally invasive implant device. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients (8 men, 10 women), average age 52 (median 48, range 38 to 72), who had been scheduled for sinus augmentation procedures, were asked to enroll in a prospective clinical study. A healthrelated quality-of-life questionnaire was given to the patient. The questionnaire was designed to assess patient's perception of recovery in four main areas: pain, oral function, general activity, and other symptoms. The questionnaire was compared to the surgical chart that described the surgical details and to the outcome. RESULTS: Patients' perceptions of postoperative symptoms in the four tested areas: pain, oral function, general activity, and other symptoms were mostly scored "not at all" or "very little" from postoperative day (POD) 1. Most patients returned to work on POD 1. CONCLUSION: The current results offer a preliminary indication that patients undergoing sinus augmentation using a minimally invasive implant device can expect to experience minimum discomfort and immediate return to everyday activity.

Minimally invasive sinus lift implant device: a multicenter safety and efficacy trial preliminary results.

PURPOSE: In cases of advanced maxillary sinus atrophy of the bone (pneumatization), the sinus floor has to be augmented in order to obtain acceptable bone volume for implantation. The objective of the present study is to evaluate a new procedure and device, designed as a closed sinus lift using a dedicated dental implant that allows for Schneiderian membrane elevation and the placement of a flowable bone replacement graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (8 males, 10 females) underwent 23 procedures. All procedures were completed successfully, with elevation of the sinus membrane and insertion of bone graft and the dental implant at the planned site. No membrane tears were noted. No intraoperative or postoperative adverse events were observed in any of the cases. There were no postprocedural emergency or distress calls. RESULTS: The patients' average age was 52 (range 38-72). The mean residual alveolar ridge height was 5.5 mm (range 4.0-7.0). The average bone gain was 11.2 mm (range 9-13) after an average healing period of 8.7 months (range 6.7-13.1). All implants achieved clinical stability and prosthetic rehabilitation was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: A closed sinus floor elevation procedure can be accomplished using a dedicated dental implant that allows for hydraulic elevation of the Schneiderian membrane and placement of a flowable bone replacement graft and dental implant placement all at the same time with minimal patient discomfort.

Healing kinetics of periapical lesions enhanced by the apexum procedure: a clinical trial.

The new Apexum procedure (Apexum Ltd, Or-Yehuda, Israel) is based on a minimally invasive removal of periapical chronically inflamed tissues through a root canal access. Its goal is to enhance healing kinetics of periapical lesions. This clinical study was conducted to explore the safety and efficacy of this procedure. The Apexum procedure was applied, as a supplementary step, during conventional root canal treatment in 48 teeth with periapical lesions. Safety and efficacy were clinically and radiographically assessed and teeth of the Apexum-treated group were compared with 39 similar teeth treated by the same endodontic procedure with no additional intervention. No adverse events occurred in either the Apexum-treated or conventional treatment groups. Furthermore, healing kinetics was significantly enhanced in the Apexum-treated group (p < 0.005). At 3 and 6 months, 87% and 95% of the lesions in the Apexum-treated group, respectively, presented advanced or complete healing, whereas only 22% and 39% of the lesions in the conventional treatment group presented this degree of healing at 3 and 6 months, respectively.

Enhancement of healing kinetics of periapical lesions in dogs by the Apexum procedure.

In nonsurgical endodontic procedures, the healing of apical periodontitis is achieved by treatment provided within the root canal system. The new Apexum procedure is based on advancing the debridement one step further by minimally invasive removal of the inflamed periapical tissues through root canal access, thereby enhancing the healing kinetics of periapical lesions. The Apexum procedure uses 2 sequential rotary devices designed to extend beyond the apex and to mince periapical tissues on rotation in a low-speed handpiece, followed by washing out the minced tissue. This initial animal study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and potential adverse effects of this procedure. Periapical lesions were induced in the lower premolars in dogs by placement of autologous dental plaque and subsequent radiographic verification. Fifty roots with periapical lesions were then subjected to cleaning, shaping and disinfection of their root canals, using a conventional root canal treatment protocol. Teeth in group 1 were subjected to the new Apexum procedure just before obturation, whereas roots in group 2 were subjected to no additional intervention before obturation. Clinical and radiographic follow-ups were carried out for 6 months. Radiographic healing of the periapical lesions in dogs at 3 and 6 months showed significantly enhanced kinetics in the Apexum-treated group compared with the conventional treatment group, at both time points (p <0.01). No noticeable adverse events occurred in either of the groups. This new procedure might significantly enhance healing kinetics of apical periodontitis compared with conventional nonsurgical endodontic treatment.

Immediate root canal disinfection with ultraviolet light: an ex vivo feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to test application of ultraviolet light to root canal walls, as a mean of complementary immediate disinfection after the use of sodium hypochlorite. STUDY DESIGN: Root canals were infected ex vivo with Enterococcus faecalis for 48 hours. Non-attached bacteria were washed away, and the remaining attached bacteria were subjected to disinfection, with 5% sodium hypochlorite alone or followed by exposure to ultraviolet light (254 nm, 300 mJ/cm(2)). Root canals were then tested for remaining viable bacteria. Canals were obturated and tested again after 14 days. RESULTS: Sodium hypochlorite alone achieved negative cultures in only 47% of the cases, but 96% was achieved with sodium hypochlorite followed by ultraviolet light (P < .001). This status was also maintained after 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: Illumination of root canals with ultraviolet light may be an effective supplementary means to achieve immediate disinfection of infected root canals.

[Avascular necrosis of the jaw bone after bisphosphonate therapy].

Bisphosphonates have an antiosteolytic effect by the inhibition of osteoclastic action. Although the exact mode of action is not completely understood, major progress on both the cellular and molecular levels has been made in recent years. Bisphosphonates alleviate pain and reduce complications, such as pathologic fractures, or hypercalcemia. Dental and periodontal research has shown great interest in clinical applications of bisphosphonates' antiosteolytic and antiosteoclastic traits, since they can be applied to counteract bone loss in chronic periodontitis. Investigations have associated avascular necrosis events in the jawbones with bisphosphonate therapy. Maxillary and mandibular osteonecrotic foci accompanied by pain, inconvenience and purulent exudates were incidentally found in patients who were taking pamidronate (Aredia), zolendronate (Zometa) and even alendronate (Fosalan). Our institutional database search over the past year yielded ten patients who were admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, due to an osteonecrotic bone lesion coupled with a prior history of bisphosphonate therapy. All these patients also had a recent dental extraction. They were all treated according to the osteomyelitis protocol, and their response to therapy varied from several weeks to many months, with some cases requiring repeat surgical intervention (curettage or sequestrectomy). This article strives to alert on the possible linkage between drug therapy using bisphosphonates and the serious event of avascular jawbone necrosis. The important role of the oral surgeon in following up on this group of patients should not be underestimated.

The presurgical workup before third molar surgery: how much is enough?

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the indications for patient referral for computed tomography (CT) scan before third molar extraction. The influence of the data obtained from the CT scans on the surgical outcome and morbidity was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 189 patients in the study (120 females and 69 males). Sixty-five patients were referred to receive CT and formed the study group. The remaining patients were included in the control group. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to demographic data and tooth and root angulations. Indications for tooth extraction such as pain, swelling, pericoronitis, caries, endodontic problems, pathology, and prosthetic considerations were similar. The proximity of the tooth root to the inferior alveolar canal was the only statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P <.001). The treatment plan outcomes for extraction, surgical extraction, and follow-up were comparable. The surgeon changed the initial decision from "surgical extraction" to "follow-up" in only 1 case after CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that the main reason for CT scan referral is the proximity of the third molar root to the inferior alveolar canal (<1 mm). The data obtained from the CT scan had minimal effect on the final surgical outcome. The routine use of CT scan in cases of third molar extractions cannot be recommended.

Case selection for apical surgery: a retrospective evaluation of associated factors and rational.

Endodontic failures associated with poor quality of endodontics respond favorably to retreatment. Nevertheless, under certain clinical conditions, apicoectomy should be the preferred procedure. A retrospective survey of 200 roots that were referred for apical surgery revealed that 83% of the roots were inadequately obturated, including 8.5% with no root canal filling at all. In 49 of the roots in this group (24.5% of the referred cases) nonsurgical retreatment was judged by an endodontist as either impossible or improbable because it might jeopardize the root integrity. Retreatment should have been the preferred treatment modality for the rest of the group, provided that coronal restorations could be safely bypassed or removed. Posts were found in 63 of these teeth, however 35 of them were either short or loosely fitting and could safely be removed. The rest of the posts were longer than 5 mm, which might have presented a problem if their removal was attempted. In 45% of the 200 cases in the present study, surgical intervention was justified. The rest of the cases (55%) should have either been subjected to a follow-up (10.5%) or retreated nonsurgically by a skilled endodontist (44.5%). These results indicate that referring dentists may not appreciate the retreatment possibilities offered by modern endodontics, and they emphasize the need for a shift of concept: endodontists should be involved in the decision making before referring a patient to surgery.