ABSTRACT
Nusinsersen is now available in Italy for all SMA types. We describe the experience with intrathecal treatment with nusinersen in 50 patients with SMA at the NEMO Center (NEuroMuscular Omniservice Clinical Center) in Milan, a neuromuscular patient-centered clinic hosted within Niguarda Hospital, a National Public General Hospital. Our results indicate that the pathway of care described outweighs the burden due to the repeated intrathecal injections. Irrespective of age and severity, the treatment is feasible, accessible, and replicable provided that there is a multidisciplinary team having experience and training in SMA.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal/drug therapy , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Oligonucleotides/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Family , Geography, Medical , Humans , Infant , Injections, Spinal , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal/complications , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal/diagnosis , Neuroprotective Agents/adverse effects , Oligonucleotides/adverse effects , Patient Care Team , Patient Dropouts , Scoliosis/complications , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Puncture , Spine/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
The objective of our study was to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the effects of three strictly monitored exercise programs(SMEP) compared to "usual care" (UCP) in a cohort of ALS patients. We included patients with definite and probable ALS and disease duration ≤24 months. Patients were randomized to receive a SMEPs or a UCP. SMEPs included three subgroups of treatment: active exercises associated with cycloergometer activity (1A), only active (1B) and passive (1C) exercises, respectively. Moreover, SMEP patients and their caregivers were trained to a daily home-based passive exercise program. The UCP group was treated with passive and stretching exercises twice weekly. The treatment period for both groups was 6 months (T180), and patients were assessed by revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), % Forced Vital Capacity (FVC %), and McGill Quality of Life (MGQoL) questionnaire. ALSFRS-R score was also evaluated at 6 months after the treatment period (T360). Sixty ALS patients were randomly assigned to one of two arms: SMEP Group included 30 patients, ten subjects for each subgroup (1A, 1B, and 1C); 30 patients were included in the UCP Group.At T180 and T360, SMEPs group had significantly higher ALSFRS-R score compared to the UCP group (32.8 ± 6.5 vs 28.7 ± 7.5, p = 0.0298; 27.5 ± 7.6 vs 23.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.0338, respectively). No effects of SMEPs on survival, respiratory decline and MGQol were found. In conclusion, although no effect on survival was demonstrated,our data suggest that a strictly monitored exercise program may significantly reduce motor deterioration in ALS patients.
