Drugs associated with epidermal necrolysis in children: A World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions most often induced by drugs. To date, no large pharmacovigilance study has been conducted in the paediatric population. OBJECTIVES: To describe the spectrum of drugs associated with SJS-TEN in children through the analysis of cases reported in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). METHODS: Disproportionality study using data from VigiBase. All paediatric (age under 18 years) cases reported between January 1, 1967, and July 6, 2022, were included. For each molecule, a case-non-case study was performed to assess a potential pharmacovigilance signal by computing the lower end of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC025). We performed sensitivity analyses, (i) taking into account only cases reported by physicians and (ii) taking into account only cases reported in the last 10 years. RESULTS: Among 31,376,783 adverse drug reactions reported in VigiBase, 2,248,727 were paediatric cases and 7342 were encoded as paediatric SJS-TEN. Significant statistical pharmacovigilance signals were observed for 165 drugs. The two most represented drug classes were antiepileptics and anti-infectious drugs. The five drugs with the highest IC025 were lamotrigine (IC025 4.99), carbamazepine (IC025 4.88), phenobarbital (IC025 4.67), phenytoin (IC025 4.52) and nimesulide (IC025 4.23). Acetaminophen was significantly associated with paediatric SJS-TEN (IC025 2.85) and we also described various new suspected drugs. Vaccines had no significant pharmacovigilance signal. These results were confirmed with the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study updates the spectrum of drugs potentially associated with paediatric SJS-TEN.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

Reality of drug-induced erythema multiforme: A French pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Since the 2002 SCAR study, erythema multiforme (EM), a post-infectious disease, has been distinguished from Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), drug-induced. Nevertheless, EM cases are still reported in the French pharmacovigilance database (FPDB). OBJECTIVES: To describe EM reported in the FPDB and to compare the quality and the characteristics of the reports. METHODS: This retrospective observational study selected all EM cases reported in the FPDB over two periods: period 1 (P1, 2008-2009) and period 2 (P2, 2018-2019). Inclusion criteria were 1) a diagnosis of clinically typical EM and/or validated by a dermatologist; 2) a reported date of onset of the reaction; and 3) a precise chronology of drug exposure. Cases were classified confirmed EM (typical acral target lesions and/or validation by a dermatologist) and possible EM (not-otherwise-specified target lesions, isolated mucosal involvement, doubtful with SJS). We concluded possible drug-induced EM when EM was confirmed, with onset ranging from 5 to 28 days without an alternative cause. RESULTS: Among 182 selected reports, 140 (77%) were analyzed. Of these, 67 (48%) presented a more likely alternative diagnosis than EM. Of the 73 reports of EM cases finally included (P1, n=41; P2, n=32), 36 (49%) had a probable non-drug cause and 28 (38%) were associated with only drugs with an onset time ≤4 days and/or ≥29 days. Possible drug-induced EM was retained in 9 cases (6% of evaluable reports). Etiological work-up was more often performed in period 2 than 1 (53.1% vs 29.3%, P=0.04), and the time to onset from 5 to 28 days was more frequent in period 2 (59.2% vs 40%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that possible drug-induced EM is rare. Many reports describe "polymorphic" rashes inappropriately concluded as EM or post-infectious EM with unsuitable drug accountability subject to protopathic bias.

Outcomes Associated With Neutropenia and Lymphopenia in Epidermal Necrolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 147 Patients.

This retrospective cohort study examines the association of lymphocyte and neutrophil levels with treatment outcomes in 147 patients with epidermal necrolysis in France.

IgA Vasculitis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A French Multicenter Case Series Including 12 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign triggered several autoimmune diseases. We hereby aimed to describe IgA vasculitis (IgAV) following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a national, multicenter, retrospective study in France of new-onset adult IgAV diagnosis following COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients with new-onset IgAV were included. Of these, 5 (41.7%) were women, and the median age was 52.5 (IQR 30.75-60.5) years. Of the 12 patients, 10 had received an mRNA vaccine and 2 had received a viral vector vaccine. The median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 11.5 (IQR 4.25-21.25) days. Vasculitis occurred after the first vaccine dose in most patients (n = 8). All patients had skin involvement, with skin necrosis in 4 patients. In total, 7 patients had joint involvement and 2 had arthritis. A total of 4 patients had nonsevere gastrointestinal involvement and 2 had nonsevere renal involvement. The median C-reactive protein level was 26 (IQR 10-66.75) mg/L, the median creatininemia level was 72 (IQR 65-81) µmol/L, and 1 patient had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min at management. All patients received treatment, including 9 patients (75%) who received glucocorticoids. In total, 5 patients received a vaccine dose after developing IgAV, 1 of whom experienced a minor cutaneous relapse. CONCLUSION: The baseline presentation of IgAV following COVID-19 vaccination was mild to moderate, and outcomes were favorable. Thus, a complete COVID-19 vaccination regimen should be completed in this population. Of note, a fortuitous link cannot be ruled out, requiring a worldwide pharmacovigilance search to confirm these findings.

Which first-line treatment for cutaneous sarcoidosis? A retrospective study of 120 patients.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease that affects the skin in about 25% of patients. The treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis is guided by the extent of lesions, associated symptoms and organ involvement. To evaluate rates of response to various potential first-line treatments for cutaneous sarcoidosis during the year following treatment initiation. This retrospective multicentre study included 120 patients with cutaneous sarcoidosis. Treatment response was assessed retrospectively from the patients' medical records. Univariate logistic regression analysis, with an estimation of unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% CI ,was performed to identify factors associated with complete cutaneous remission (CR), followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. At one year, 43 of the 120 (36%) included patients had CR. The best response rates were obtained with oral corticosteroids (12/21, 57%), followed by a combination of hydroxychloroquine and topical steroids (6/13, 46%). In multivariate analysis, lupus pernio was the only predictor of a poor cutaneous response. We suggest the use of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and topical steroids as an optimal first-line treatment for cutaneous sarcoidosis, given the known adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids.

Bullous pemphigoid: Three main clusters defining 3 outcome profiles.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disorder. Its presentation is polymorphic. OBJECTIVE: To investigate different clinical and biological profiles of BP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective 2-center study including all BP patients seen between January 1, 2015, and February 28, 2021. We performed hierarchical clustering on principal components. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 1 (n = 155) were older than those in clusters 2 (n = 89) and 3 (n = 35; P < .0001), more frequently presented pauci-bullous BP (n = 63 [41%] vs 14 [16%] and 2 [6%], respectively; P < .0001) and had anti-BP230 antibodies in 87% of cases. More than 100 blisters were observed in 14 patients (40%) from cluster 3, versus 3 (2%) from cluster 1 and 0 (0%) from cluster 2 (P < .0001). Frequency of mucosal involvement was higher in cluster 3 (n = 32 [91%, including epiglottis in 40%] vs 11 [7%] and 34 [38%]; P < .0001). In clusters 2 and 3, 70% and 74% of patients had antibodies targeting only BP180. Those in cluster 3 received more lines of systemic treatment and experienced more relapses. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study without immunoelectron microscopy. CONCLUSION: We identified 3 different BP clusters, including one corresponding to severe BP180+ BP230- BP with features common to mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Efficacy and safety of treatments in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: A French observational retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa is a form of medium-sized vessel vasculitis. Despite a disabling and prolonged course, data on treatment efficacy and safety remain scarce. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe treatment efficacy and safety in patients with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective, observational study, recorded clinical and biologic data together with treatments received. The primary outcome was the rate of complete response at month 3. Secondary outcomes assessed drug survival and safety. RESULTS: We included 68 patients who received a median of 2 therapeutic lines (interquartile range, 1-3). Overall, complete response was achieved in 13 of 42 (31%) patients with colchicine, 4 of 17 (23%) with dapsone, 11 of 25 (44%) with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone, 1 of 9 (11%) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 11 of 13 (84%) with GCs+azathioprine, and 7 of 15 (47%) with GCs+methotrexate. GCs+azathioprine had the best drug survival (median duration, 29.5 months; interquartile range, 19.5-36.0). Response at month 3 was decreased with peripheral neurologic involvement (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.81; P = .04). Overall, the rate of treatment-related adverse events was 18%, which led to the discontinuation of treatment in 7% of patients. LIMITATION: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Colchicine seems to confer good benefit-risk balance in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa without peripheral sensory neuropathy. GCs+azathioprine seem the best treatment in the event of relapse.

Biases associated with epidermal necrolysis reporting in pharmacovigilance: An exploratory analysis using World Health Organization VigiBase.

BACKGROUND: Possible biases in pharmacovigilance reporting may impact epidermal necrolysis (EN) and drugs associations. OBJECTIVES: To assess biases associated with EN-reporting. METHODS: Using VigiBase, the World Health Organization-pharmacovigilance database, among drugs associated with EN between 2016 and 2020, we used an unsupervised clustering including reports characteristics, that is, reporter quality, time from drug intake to EN onset, and only one suspected drug in the report. RESULTS: Among 152 drugs, three clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (n = 41) exhibited drugs frequently reported within a time from intake to onset longer than 4 days, in 57 ± 13% of reports. It corresponded to well-reported drugs and was composed mainly of antivirals and antiepileptics. Cluster 2 (n = 42) exhibited drugs frequently reported within a time from drug intake to onset shorter than 4 days, in 31 ± 12% of reports. It corresponded to drugs with a high risk of protopathic bias and was composed of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics, and antibiotics. Cluster 3 (n = 69) exhibited drugs frequently reported with an unavailable time from drug intake to reaction, in 66 ± 11% of reports, and reported by a high frequency of consumers (9 ± 9%). It corresponded to drugs reported with a high risk of classification bias, and was composed of anticancer therapies and cardiovascular drugs. CONCLUSION: Protopathic and classification biases impact EN-reporting and should be considered regarding associations with antibiotics, NSAIDs, analgesics, anticancer therapies, and cardiovascular drugs.

Evolution of Drug Survival with Biological Agents and Apremilast Between 2012 and 2018 in Patients with Psoriasis from the PsoBioTeq Cohort.

Drug survival reflects treatment effectiveness and safety in real life. There is limited data on the variation of drug survival with the availability of systemic treatments with additional biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs). The aim of this study was to determine whether the increasing number of available systemic treatments for psoriasis affects drug survival over time. Patients were selected from the PsoBioTeq cohort, a French prospective observational cohort enrolling patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. All patients initiating a first bDMARD or sDMARD were included. The primary outcome was comparison of drug survival over time. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio model was computed. A total of 1,866 patients were included; 739 females (39%), median age 47 years. In the multivariate Cox model, no association was found between the calendar year of initiation and drug survival (hazard ratio) overlapping from 0.80 (0.42-1.52) to 1.17 (0.64-2.17), p = 0.633). In conclusion, drug survival in psoriasis is not affected by the year of initiation.

Overlapping network meta-analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments, an overview: quantity does not make quality.

BACKGROUND: Network meta-analyses (NMAs) have become successful in addressing gaps in the comparative effectiveness of systemic treatments in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, their increasing number carries both a risk of overlap and reproducibility issues that can hamper clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVES: In this overview, we aimed to assess redundancy across these NMAs and to describe their characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered all systematic reviews with NMAs of randomized controlled trials that included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and that evaluated the efficacy and/or safety of systemic treatments compared with placebo or with an active comparator. PubMed/MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, PROSPERO and the Evidence update of the Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology of the University of Nottingham were searched up to 25 February 2021. Our main outcome was the number per year of redundant NMAs and the extent of their overlap. We also described their features, especially, the confidence in the results of the reviews, the funding of the studies and the presence of spin (a description that overstates efficacy and/or understates harm), reporting issues and methodological characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 47 redundant NMAs were included. Only two of 47 (4%) included all available treatments. Both efficacy and safety were evaluated in 14 of 47 (30%) NMAs and both short- and long-term evaluations were assessed in five of 47 (11%). Confidence in the results was critically low for 39 of 47 (83%) NMAs and only 10 of 47 (21·3%) registered a protocol. Twenty-six of 47 NMAs (55%) received pharmaceutical funding. Contract research organizations were involved in 19 of 47 (40%) NMAs. Reporting was poor across most of the NMA abstracts and spin was present in all of the abstracts. Almost half of the NMAs failed to consider important limitations such as heterogeneity (considered in 32%) or consistency (considered in 66%). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to a duplication of efforts, our overview showed heterogeneous methods and poor confidence in the results in a majority of the included NMAs, further distorted by reporting issues and spin. Clinicians need to interpret NMAs with caution when looking for the most reliable and comprehensive evidence.