A New High-Speed Shielded Curved Device Allowing Safe Posterior Thoracic Discectomy Through a Modified Transforaminal Thoracic Interbody Fusion Approach: Technique Description and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate approach for surgical removal of thoracic disc herniations is controversial. The posterior approach historically acquired a bad reputation due to high rates of neurologic deterioration subsequent to spinal cord manipulation. The anterior approach has consequently gained popularity but entails a larger magnitude of surgery if open and is technically demanding if approached thoracoscopically. Approaching the thoracic disc posteriorly following unilateral facetectomy and pediculectomy was suggested in 1978. This study presents a technique for posterior unilateral thoracic discectomy through a hemilaminectomy, unilateral facetectomy, and hemipediculectomy, facilitated by a novel curved dorsally shielded high-speed device. Introducing the device ventral to the dural sac allows removal of calcified and soft disc fragments without relying on forceful manual maneuvers and avoiding manipulation of the spinal cord. METHODS: The maximal disc protrusion side is approached through a hemilaminectomy, unilateral facetectomy, and hemipediculectomy removing the superior half of the pedicle and exposing the disc transforaminally, allowing its removal using the device. Pedicle fixation and fusion concluded all procedures (TTIF). Between June 2014 and November 2018, 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) ages 23 to 74 years underwent posterior thoracic discectomy applying the above approach. The affected levels were D3 to D4 (1), D5 to D6 (1), D7 to D8 (1), D9 to D10 (1), D10 to D11 (3), D11 to D12 (4), and D12 to L1 (1). RESULTS: All patients presented with neurologic deterioration and all but 2 with pyramidal signs. All procedures were uneventful, without dural tears. None of the patients deteriorated neurologically. Average back pain visual analog scale scores decreased by 1.2, from 6.6 to 5.4. Average leg pain visual analog scale scores decreased by 2.2, from 6.6 to 4.4. Improvement was noted in Oswestry Disability Index scores and 6 SF-36 metrics. CONCLUSIONS: The new curved device and approach allow for a faster, safer thoracic disc herniation removal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed technique allows a safer treatment for thoracic disc herniations, reducing complication rates and improving patient outcome.

The da Vinci robotic surgical assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion: technical development and case report.

STUDY DESIGN: Technique development to use the da Vince Robotic Surgical System for anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1 is detailed. A case report is also presented. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and develop the da Vinci robotic assisted laparoscopic anterior lumbar stand-alone interbody fusion procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion is a common procedure associated with potential morbidity related to the surgical approach. The da Vinci robot provides intra-abdominal dissection and visualization advantages compared with the traditional open and laparoscopic approach. METHODS: The surgical techniques for approach to the anterior lumbar spine using the da Vinci robot were developed and modified progressively beginning with operative models followed by placement of an interbody fusion cage in the living porcine model. Development continued to progress with placement of fusion cage in a human cadaver, completed first in the laboratory setting and then in the operating room. Finally, the first patient with fusion completed using the da Vinci robot-assisted approach is presented. RESULTS: The anterior transperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine is accomplished with enhanced visualization and dissection capability, with maintenance of pneumoperitoneum using the da Vinci robot. Blood loss is minimal. The visualization inside the disc space and surrounding structures was considered better than current open and laparoscopic techniques. CONCLUSION: The da Vinci robot Surgical System technique continues to develop and is now described for the transperitoneal approach to the anterior lumbar spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

A biomechanical evaluation of a spacer with integrated plate for treating adjacent-level disease in the subaxial cervical spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adjacent level degeneration (ALD) has been reported as one of the long-term consequences of anterior discectomy and fusion despite its clinical success in treating cervical pathologies. Traditionally, ALD is treated by replacing the previously implanted plate with a longer plate, which can lead to postoperative complications. The biomechanics of SIP in the adjacent level has not been investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the multidirectional stability of a spacer with integrated plate (SIP) in comparison to a traditional spacer and plate (TSP). STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a spacer with integrated plate adjacent to a traditional spacer and plate construct in a human cervical cadaveric model. METHODS: Eight fresh human cervical (C2-C7) cadaver spines were mounted on a six degree-of-freedom spine simulator. The sequence of test constructs was: 1) Intact; 2) TSP (C4-C6) with SIP (C3-C4); and 3) TSP (C3-C6). An unconstrained moment of ±1.5 Nm was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) was measured by a digital motion analysis system. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA repeated measures. RESULTS: All instrumented constructs significantly reduced ROM compared to the intact condition. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two-level TSP with an adjacent SIP construct and three-level TSP construct in all loading modes. CONCLUSION: The biomechanical study shows that adding a spacer with integrated plate adjacent to a two-level anterior plate demonstrates equivalent stability to a three-level anterior plate. The spacer with integrated plate, which preserves the originally plated fusion levels, may overcome the complications associated with the traditional technique of replacing the original plate with a longer plate. However, prospective clinical studies are required to address the clinical benefits and challenges, if any.

The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical plating increases stability and hence improves fusion rates to treat cervical spine pathologies, which are often symptomatic at multiple levels. However, plating is not without complications, such as dysphagia, injury to neural elements, and plate breakage. The biomechanics of a spacer with integrated plate system combined with posterior instrumentation (PI), in two-level and three-level surgical models, has not yet been investigated. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to biomechanically evaluate the multidirectional rigidity of spacer with integrated plate (SIP) at multiple levels as comparable to traditional spacers and plating. STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro cervical cadaveric model. METHODS: Eight fresh human cervical (C2-C7) cadaver spines were tested under pure moments of ±1.5 Nm on spine simulator test frame. Each spine was tested in intact condition, with only anterior fixation and with both anterior and PI. Range of motion (ROM) was measured using Optotrak Certus (NDI, Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) motion analysis system in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) at the instrumented levels (C3-C6). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All the surgical constructs showed significant reduction in motion compared with intact condition. In two-level fusion, SIP (C4-C6) construct significantly reduced ROM by 66.5%, 65.4%, and 60.3% when compared with intact in FE, LB, and AR, respectively. In three-level fusion, SIP (C3-C6) construct significantly reduced ROM by 65.8%, 66%, and 49.6% when compared with intact in FE, LB, and AR, respectively. Posterior instrumentation showed significant stability only in three-level fusion when compared with their respective anterior constructs. In both two-level and three-level fusion, SIP showed comparable stability to traditional spacer and plate constructs in all loading modes. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomically profiled spacer with integrated plate allows treatment of cervical disorders with fewer steps and less impact to cervical structures. In this biomechanical study, spacer with integrated plate construct showed comparable stability to traditional spacer and plate for two-level and three-level fusion. Posterior instrumentation showed significant effect only in three-level fusion. Clinical data are required for further validation of using spacer with integrated plate at multiple levels.

Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures have a known incidence of subsidence. The individual risk of subsidence for specific lumbar levels in ALIF procedures has not been determined. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of subsidence with two ALIF constructs. A paired Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) standard cage construct is compared with a paired BAK Proximity construct (Sulzer Spine-Tech, Minneapolis, MN). Study purpose is to evaluate lumbar intervertebral disc subsidence including the subsidence incidence for each disc level and with single- and two-level constructs. Also evaluated is the site of maximal subsidence within each end plate, risk with increased reaming depth, fusion incidence and clinical outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A consecutive series of 70 fused levels fused with paired standard BAK cages is compared with a subsequent series of 70 fused levels using paired Proximity BAK cages. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study population is derived from a consecutive series of ALIF procedures completed by a single surgeon. In 1998 the construct was changed from dual-standard to dual-Proximity cages. In the year 2000 there were 52 patients with a 2-year follow-up. These were matched to the previous 52 patients with dual-standard construct. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome was determined using pre- and postoperative Oswestry questionnaires. Postoperative questionnaires were completed at the yearly follow-up. Radiographic outcome was determined by fusion status and evaluation of subsidence. Also evaluated was reaming depth and cage size for each fused level. METHODS: A total of 52 patients with ALIF procedures using paired BAK standard cages (the SS group) were studied with a group of 52 patients using paired BAK Proximity cages (the PP group). The study population was derived from an ongoing prospective study of consecutive ALIF fusion procedures completed by a single surgeon. Disc height measurements were used to determine subsidence. Reaming depth, fusion status and the site of maximal subsidence were all recorded. Clinical outcome was determined with a pre- and postoperative Oswestry functional questionnaire. RESULTS: Subsidence greater than 2 mm was noted in 5 of the 70 SS fused levels and in 9 of the 70 fused PP levels. Subsidence was always at the L4-L5 level in the SS subsided levels. Subsidence was in two-level fusions in all but one of the SS constructs. Subsidence was at the L4-L5 level in eight of the nine subsided PP levels. Subsidence was associated with increased reaming depth and the use of larger cage sizes. Subsidence was usually in the posterior and superior end plate. The clinical outcome was not affected by subsidence. Subsidence incidence was not associated with the age, sex or weight of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant increased incidence of subsidence at the L4-L5 level as opposed to other fused lumbar levels in ALIF fusions with BAK cage constructs. There is an increased incidence of subsidence with the PP constructs. Subsidence also is associated with increased reaming depth and with larger cage sizes. The lowest risk for subsidence was with single-level dual-standard cage constructs.

The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was initiated in 1955 with a radiographic and clinical study of 500 first-grade children. OBJECTIVE: To determine the natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most studies on the natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are based on patient populations presenting with pain. Critical to any natural history investigation is the study of a population of affected individuals, whether symptomatic or not, from onset of the condition through their lives. METHODS: By study of a population from the age of 6 years to adulthood, 30 individuals were identified to have pars lesions. Data collection at a 45-year follow-up assessment included magnetic resonance imaging, a back pain questionnaire, and the SF-36 Survey. RESULTS: No subject with a pars defect was lost to follow-up evaluation once a lesion was identified. Subjects with unilateral defects never experienced slippage over the course of the study. Progression of spondylolisthesis slowed with each decade. There was no association of slip progression and low back pain. There was no statistically significant difference between the study population SF-36 scores and those of the general population the same age. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the only prospective study to document the natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis from onset through more than 45 years of life in a population unselected for pain. Subjects with pars defects follow a clinical course similar to that of the general population. There appears to be a marked slowing of slip progression with each decade, and no subject has reached a 40% slip.