Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 97(1): 43-51, 2004 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15527917

ABSTRACT

Nineteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study to evaluate the performance of validation samples consisting of powdered infant formula and cereal-based weaning food artificially contaminated with low levels of Salmonella anatum. The Standard method BS EN ISO 6579:2002 was to be followed for the trial. Salmonella counts in each baby food were around 10 CFU/25 g (low) or 10 CFU/g (high level). Trial participants received five samples of each sample type and five blank samples. All samples contained Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Lactobacillus spp. at concentrations between 10(4) and 10(5) CFU/g as background flora. Precision data for the powdered infant formula were similar for the solid selective plating-out medium xylose-lysine-deoxycholate (XLD) and a 2nd choice of agar suitable to isolate Salmonella spp. The sensitivity was 91.3%, accordance 82.5% and concordance 83.9% for the low and 100% for the high level in all cases. For the cereal-based weaning food, the precision data for the high level were similar for XLD and the 2nd choice medium (98.8%, 97.5% and 97.5%). A slight difference was observed for the low level where XLD obtained values of 82.5%, 73.8%, 70.6% for sensitivity, accordance and concordance and the second choice medium values of 81.5%, 72.5% and 69%. The specificity, accordance and concordance of blanks for the infant formula and cereal-based weaning food were 100%.


Subject(s)
Agar/chemistry , Colony Count, Microbial/standards , Food Analysis/standards , Infant Food/microbiology , Laboratories/standards , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Edible Grain/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Microbiology , Humans , Infant , Infant Formula , Infant, Newborn , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Syst Appl Microbiol ; 27(4): 492-500, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15368855

ABSTRACT

Council Directive 70/524/EEC regulates the application of probiotic (microorganisms) additives in feeding stuffs. In the present study a method for the differentiation and strain identification of authorised probiotic Saccharomyces cereviseae strains in feeding stuffs by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was validated. Four different samples of animal feeding stuffs containing yeast at levels between 10(5) to 10(7) CFU/g were examined. Samples were enumerated on chloramphenicol glucose yeast extract agar and colonies were selected from these plates for DNA extraction and subsequent analysis. The PCR method using delta sequence primers produced an 'amplified sequence polymorphism' characteristic for the test strain. Feeds supplemented with one of four probiotic yeast strains each were analysed by seven of nine invited laboratories. All laboratories returned valid results with the exception of one laboratory that had insufficiently separated bands on the gel. The method had a good reproducibility for probiotic yeast isolates from feed of all four authorised probiotic yeast strains (APYS) CBS 493.94, APYS CNCM 1-1079, APYS CNCM 1-1077, APYS NCYC SC47 and of a commercially available yeast reference strain, NCYC 81. The PCR method is to be considered by CEN and ISO as official control method for identification of authorised probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from feeding stuffs.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Probiotics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/classification , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial , DNA, Fungal/analysis , Phenotype , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Terminal Repeat Sequences/genetics
3.
J AOAC Int ; 87(3): 604-13, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15287658

ABSTRACT

A standard method for the detection of Enterobacteriaceae was modified for the presumptive detection of Enterobacter sakazakii, and the modified method was validated in an interlaboratory trial with 16 laboratories from 8 European countries. The modification included a differential-elective medium for the isolation of E. sakazakii, consisting of nutrient agar (NA) supplemented with 4-methyl-umbelliferyl alpha-D-glucoside (alpha-MUG). A 25 g sample was added to 225 mL buffered peptone water. After incubation at 35 degrees or 37 degrees C for 16 or 20 h, 10 mL nonselective enrichment was transferred into 90 mL selective enrichment. The selective enrichment was streaked on violet-red bile glucose agar (VRBGA) and incubated at 37 degrees C for 24 h. It was streaked in parallel on NA plates supplemented with alpha-MUG at 50 mg/L and incubated at 25 degrees C for 16 h, and afterwards for an additional 24 h at room temperature in the dark. E. sakazakii appeared as vivid yellow colonies under normal light and showed blue/violet fluorescence under UV light on NA + alpha-MUG plates. Validation samples represented powdered infant formula without E. sakazakii (blanks) and with low (1-10 colony-forming units [CFU]/25 g) and medium (1-10 CFU/g) contamination levels. All samples contained Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Lactobacillus spp. as background flora. The specificity for blank samples was 100%. The sensitivity of the low contamination level was similar for VRBGA and NA + alpha-MUG, i.e., 66.7% (66.7% accordance, 53.9% concordance). For the medium level the sensitivities were 96.7% (93.3% accordance, 93.5% concordance) for VRBGA and 98.3% (96.9% accordance, 96.9% concordance) for NA + alpha-MUG.


Subject(s)
Enterobacter/chemistry , Hymecromone/analogs & derivatives , Infant Food/microbiology , Child , Culture Media , Enterobacteriaceae/chemistry , Europe , Freeze Drying , Glucosides/chemistry , Humans , Hymecromone/chemistry , Indicators and Reagents , Infant , Lactobacillus/chemistry , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrometry, Fluorescence
4.
J AOAC Int ; 86(4): 791-801, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14509440

ABSTRACT

An enumeration method to be used as official control under Council Directive 70/524/EEC for probiotic pediococci used as feed additives was validated for consideration for adoption as Comitée Européen de Normalisation (CEN) and ISO standards. Seventeen laboratories in 11 European countries carried out an interlaboratory study. A spread plate method following BS ISO 15214:1998 using 4 different agars [MRS, acidified MRS, MRS with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), and a newly developed pediococci selective medium (PSM)] was validated. Precision data in terms of repeatability (r) and reproducibility (R) of the method for each medium using different feeding stuffs with a high and a low inoculation level were determined. Pediococci were present in the samples in mixtures with other probiotics. The enumeration of pediococci on all agars showed an RSDr value of 0.4-3.1% and an RSDR of 1.3-4.8%. MRS agar was preferred, followed by acidified MRS and MRS + TTC agar. All 4 media gave similar counts. Depending on the presence and concentration of other probiotic, such as enterococci, lactobacilli, and yeast, acidified MRS or MRS + TTC agar are recommended. The PSM was selective for pediococci and can be used if this species is present at a concentration more than 10-fold lower than other species that can grow on the MRS agars. The methodology with all 4 media is not applicable to mineral feed.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Pediococcus/isolation & purification , Probiotics , Agar , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Colony Count, Microbial , Culture Media , Laboratories , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
J AOAC Int ; 86(3): 568-75, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12852578

ABSTRACT

Fourteen out of 17 laboratories completed an interlaboratory study comparing 2 pretreatment protocols of feed samples containing authorized probiotic bacilli spores. Both methods used tryptone soy agar for enumeration. Pretreatment A involved preparation of a suspension of the feed sample in 50% ethanol. For pretreatment B, the sample was suspended in peptone salt solution and heated at 80 degrees C for 10 min. Each laboratory analyzed 12 samples (6 per pretreatment), which represented duplicates of a high (10(9) colony-forming units [CFU]/g) and low (10(5) CFU/g) level of bacilli spores or a blank that contained vegetative probiotic bacteria only. For pretreatment A, the repeatability relative standard deviation (RSD(r)) was 2.9% for the low level and 2.5% for the high. The reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values were 7.8 and 5.9%, respectively. Pretreatment B revealed RSD(r) values of 1.1 and 1.0%, and RSDR values of 5.8 and 3.4%, respectively. The heat treatment (pretreatment B) of feed samples had better precision data, resulted in higher viable bacilli counts, and was more effective in deactivating vegetative background flora. It is therefore recommended for adoption for official control purposes and for CEN and ISO standards.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Bacillus/isolation & purification , Probiotics , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial
6.
Syst Appl Microbiol ; 26(1): 147-53, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12747423

ABSTRACT

An official control method in the framework of Council Directive 70/524/EEC for probiotic yeast used as feed additives was validated in a collaborative study by twenty laboratories in 12 European Countries. A pour plate method following ISO 7954 using chloramphenicol glucose yeast extract (CGYE) and a plate count method using CHROMagar Candida were used. Precision data in terms of repeatability (r) and reproducibility (R) of the method using different feeding stuffs and three inoculation levels were determined. Yeast was present in the samples in mixtures with other probiotic feed additives at a lower, a higher concentration or not present. The enumeration of yeast on CGYE agar showed for the lower and higher concentration a RSD(r) of 2.4-4.9% and a RSD(R) of 7.7-8%, respectively and was preferred by the majority of labs. CHROMagar Candida had a RSD(r) of 1.9-2.8% and a RSD(R) of 1.9-5.9%. For routine analysis the use of the pour plate technique is recommended. CHROMagar Candida can be used for confirmation of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The methods are not recommended for mineral feeds. The results from this study are intended for consideration for adoption as CEN and ISO standards.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Probiotics/isolation & purification , Yeasts/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial/standards , Culture Media/chemistry , Reference Standards , Temperature , Yeasts/isolation & purification
7.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 83(2): 161-70, 2003 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12706037

ABSTRACT

An enumeration method to be used as an official control method in the framework of Council Directive 70/524/EEC for probiotic bifidobacteria used as feed additives was validated. Seventeen laboratories in 11 European Countries carried out a collaborative study. A spread plate method following BS ISO 15214:1998 using four different agars, Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS), acidified MRS, MRS with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) and a selective bifidobacteria medium, was validated. Precision data in terms of repeatability (r) and reproducibility (R) of the method for each medium using different feeding stuffs with a high and a low inoculation level were determined. Bifidobacteria were present in the samples as a single component or in mixtures with other probiotics. The enumeration of bifidobacteria on all agars showed a relative standard deviation of repeatability (RSD(r)) between 1.2% and 6.3% and a relative standard deviation of reproducibility (RSD(R)) between 2.6% and 8.7%. MRS agar was preferred, followed by acidified MRS and MRS+TTC agar. The selective bifidobacteria medium gave similar counts as the MRS media. For routine analysis, the use of MRS agar with supplementation of cysteine hydrochloride (the selective bifidobacteria medium without antibiotics) is recommended. Depending on the presence and concentration of other probiotics such as enterococci, lactobacilli and pediococci, acidified MRS or MRS+TTC agar is recommended. The selective bifidobacteria medium was selective for bifidobacteria. An official control method for enumeration of probiotic bifidobacteria as a single component and in mixtures with other probiotic microorganisms in feeding stuffs was validated. The methodology is not applicable to mineral feed. The results are intended for consideration for adaptation as CEN and ISO standards.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Bifidobacterium/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Food Microbiology , Probiotics/analysis , Animals , Bifidobacterium/growth & development , Culture Media , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL