Achieving a timely diagnosis for teenagers and young adults with cancer: the ACE "too young to get cancer?" study.

BACKGROUND: Time to diagnosis (TTD) concerns teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer and may affect outcome. METHODS: Healthcare records from 105 TYA in a regional cancer service were assessed to document events from 1st symptom to treatment start. Detailed pathway construction was possible for 104 patients and allowed a multidisciplinary panel review of each pathway with assessment of good practice and lessons for the future. RESULTS: 1st presentation was to primary care in 86, and 93% consulted in primary care before diagnosis. Routes to Diagnosis were 45% via urgent 2 Week Wait pathways and 38% as emergency referrals. Total Interval (time from 1st presentation to treatment start) was median 63 (range 1-559) days, varying within/between diagnoses. Patient interval (time from 1st symptom to 1st presentation) was longest for lymphoma, carcinoma and bone tumour (medians: 9, 12, 20 days). Overall, time in primary care was short (median 3, range 0-537 days) compared to secondary care (median 29, range 0-195 days) and longest for lymphoma, carcinoma, brain/CNS (medians: 10, 15, 16 days). Specialist Care interval (time from 1st specialist visit to treatment start) was longest for bone, brain/CNS, lymphoma, carcinoma (medians: 30, 33, 36, 48 days). 40% pathways were rated as showing good/best practice but 16% were less than satisfactory. Continued safety-netting/support was identified from primary care but analysis suggested opportunities for improvement in transition through secondary care. CONCLUSIONS: Previous reports of prolonged TTD have focused on delay in referral from primary care but this study suggests that this might be reduced by optimising management in secondary care.

Understanding and Utilizing the Unmet Needs of Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer to Determine Priorities for Service Development: The Macmillan On Target Programme.

Purpose: A systematic attempt to identify and address unmet needs among patients in a large regional teenagers and young adults (TYA) cancer service in the United Kingdom, including perspectives obtained from patients themselves, their families/supporters, and professionals. Methods: Questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews were undertaken with the following: patients (diagnosed ≥16 years, and aged 16-24 years at the time of study)-participation was 42 for questionnaire, 7 for focus group, and 6 for interview; family members/others in patients' lives ("networkers") (participation: 28, 0, and 4); and professionals (participation: 54, 0, and 97). Requirement management methodology was used to specify components for potential service interventions, which were then scored and prioritized. Co-creation was utilized to incorporate a deeper understanding of patient experience. Results: 42/108(39%) patients, 28/177(24%) networkers, and 122/322(38%) professionals participated. For patients, seven themes that "mattered most" (identified by >60% responders) were defined. For many, support was provided both to a lesser extent than needed and was sometimes unsatisfactory. For networkers, results identified the significant support offered by those around the patient and the impact on their own lives. For professionals, consensus was reached on interventions that could be utilized in clinical encounters with TYA to enhance care. A list of prioritized "requirements" was created to drive future service improvement. Conclusions: Areas identified for development included three specific initiatives applicable to other TYA services: a support website (www.tyahelp.co.uk); an electronic, age/developmentally specific, holistic needs assessment tool (the Integrated Assessment Map www.tyaiam.co.uk); and a portal linking use of the IAM to resources within the Help website (video illustration available at: https://vimeo.com/191019826).