Facilitators and barriers to home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana: a mixed-methods analysis of patient perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of home blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy and in low-resource settings is incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences, barriers, and facilitators of home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana. METHODS: This concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study was conducted at an urban tertiary hospital in Ghana. Participants were recruited from adult pregnant women presenting for routine antenatal care. Upon enrollment, participants' demographics and history were collected. At the next study visit, participants received audiovisual and hands-on training on using an automatic blood pressure monitor; they then monitored and logged their blood pressure daily at home for 2-4 weeks. At the final study visit, verbally administered surveys and semi-structured interviews assessed participant's experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using R version 4.2.2, and frequencies and descriptive statistics were calculated. Qualitative data were imported into DeDoose 9.0.78 for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 235 enrolled participants, 194 completed surveys; of those, 33 completed in-depth interviews. Participants' mean age was 31.6 (SD 5.3) years, 32.1% had not previously given birth, and 31.1% had less than a senior high school education. On a 4-point Likert scale, the majority reported they "definitely" were able to remember (n = 134, 69.1%), could find the time (n = 124, 63.9%), had the energy (n = 157, 80.9%), could use the blood pressure monitor without problems (n = 155, 79.9%), and had family approval (n = 182, 96.3%) while engaging in home blood pressure monitoring. 95.88% (n = 186) believed that pregnant women in Ghana should monitor their blood pressure at home. Qualitative thematic analysis demonstrated that most participants liked home blood pressure monitoring because of increased knowledge of their health during pregnancy. While most participants found measuring their blood pressure at home doable, many faced challenges. Participants' experiences with five key factors influenced how easy or difficult their experience was: 1) Time, stress, and daily responsibilities; 2) Perceived importance of BP in pregnancy; 3) Role of family; 4) Capability of performing monitoring; 5) Convenience of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant women in urban Ghana, home blood pressure monitoring was perceived as positive, important, and doable; however, challenges must be addressed.

"If You Need a Psychiatrist, It's BAD": Stigma Associated with Seeking Mental Health Care Among Obstetric Providers in Ghana.

Purpose: Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to the impact of negative patient outcomes on healthcare providers. In Ghana, obstetric providers regularly face maternal and neonatal mortality, yet limited research has focused on provision of mental health support for these providers. This study sought to understand how obstetric providers viewed seeking mental health support after poor clinical outcomes, with a focus on the role of mental health stigma. Patients and Methods: Participants were 52 obstetric providers (20 obstetrician/gynecologists and 32 midwives) at two tertiary care hospitals in Ghana. Five focus groups, led by a trained facilitator and lasting approximately two hours, were conducted to explore provider experiences and perceptions of support following poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, then analyzed qualitatively using grounded theory methodology. Results: Most participants (84.3%, N=43) were finished with training, and 46.2% (N=24) had been in practice more than 10 years. Emerging themes included pervasive stigma associated with seeking mental health care after experiencing poor clinical outcomes, which was derived from two overlapping dimensions. First, societal-level stigma resulted from a cultural norm to keep emotions hidden, and the perception that psychiatry is equated with severe mental illness. Second, provider-level stigma resulted from the belief that healthcare workers should not have mental health problems, a perception that mental health care is acceptable for patients but not for providers, and a fear about lack of confidentiality. Despite many providers acknowledging negative mental health impacts following poor clinical outcomes, these additive layers of stigma limited their willingness to engage in formal mental health care. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that stigma creates significant barriers to acceptance of mental health support among obstetric providers. Interventions to support providers will need to respect provider concerns without reinforcing the stigma associated with seeking mental health care.

Ability and accuracy of patient-performed blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in urban Ghana.

BACKGROUND: Patient-performed blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy is rarely performed in low- and middle-income country settings, including Ghana. The clinical efficacy of home blood pressure monitoring relies on a pregnant patient being able to independently execute the correct steps to position and use a blood pressure monitor and to achieve accurate blood pressure measurements. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) assess whether pregnant women can correctly use an automatic blood pressure monitor to check their blood pressure before and after a brief training and (2) determine whether blood pressure values measured by pregnant women using an automatic monitor are similar to values measured by a healthcare provider using a standard clinic monitor. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, a tertiary hospital in Accra, Ghana. Participants were adult pregnant women presenting for their first prenatal care visit. Data collection was performed by 2 Ghanaian physicians. Information on demographics, obstetrical history, and past medical history was collected. A brief training was provided on the correct use of the blood pressure monitor, including a verbal script, annotated photographs, and a hands-on demonstration. Pre- and posttraining assessments using a 9-item checklist of correct preparation, position, and use of an automatic blood pressure monitor were performed. Following a modified British Hypertension Society protocol, a series of 4 blood pressure measurements were taken, alternating between provider performed using a clinic monitor and patient performed using an automatic monitor intended for individual use and validated in pregnancy. RESULTS: Among 176 participants, the mean age was 31.5 years (±5.6), and 130 (73.9%) were multiparous. Regarding socioeconomic characteristics, 128 (72.7%) were married, 171 (97.2%) had public insurance, and 87 (49.7%) had completed ≤9 years of formal education. Regarding clinical blood pressure issues, 19 (10.9%) had a history of a hypertensive disorder in a previous pregnancy, and 6 (3.4%) had chronic hypertension. Before receiving any training, 21 participants (12.1%) performed all 9 steps correctly to prepare, position, and use the automatic blood pressure monitor. Comparing pretraining vs posttraining ability, statistically significant increases were seen in the correct performance of each step and the mean number of steps performed correctly (6.1±1.8 vs 9.0±0.2, respectively; P<.001) and proportion performing all 9 steps correctly (12.1% vs 96.6%, respectively; P<.001). The mean difference between doctor-performed and patient-performed blood pressure measurements was 5.6±4.8 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure values and 3.4±3.08 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure values, with most differences within 5 mm Hg for both systolic blood pressure values (102/176 [58.0%]) and diastolic blood pressure values (141/176 [80.1%]). CONCLUSION: After a brief training, pregnant women in Ghana demonstrated that they are able to use an automatic blood pressure monitor to check their blood pressure correctly and accurately.

Impact of antenatal care on severe maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and eclampsia in Ghana.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how specific measures of antenatal care utilization are associated with outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and eclampsia in Ghana. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were adult pregnant women with preeclampsia or eclampsia at a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Antenatal care utilization measures included timing of first visit, total visits, facility and provider type, and referral status. Antenatal visits were characterized by former and current World Health Organization recommendations, and by gestational age-based adequacy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composites of maternal complications and poor neonatal outcomes. Multivariate logistic regressions identified associations with antenatal care factors. RESULTS: Among 1176 participants, median number of antenatal visits was 5.0 (IQR 3.0-7.0), with 72.9% attending ≥4 visits, 19.4% attending ≥8 visits, and 54.9% attending adequate visits adjusted for gestational age. Care was most frequently provided in a government polyclinic (n = 522, 47.2%) and by a midwife (n = 704, 65.1%). Odds of the composite maternal complications were lower in women receiving antenatal care at a tertiary hospital (aOR 0.47, p = 0.01). Odds of poor neonatal outcomes were lower in women receiving antenatal care at a tertiary hospital (aOR 0.56, p < 0.001), by a specialist Obstetrician/Gynecologist (aOR 0.58, p < 0.001), and who attended ≥8 visits (aOR 0.67, p = 0.04). Referred women had twice the odds of a maternal complication (aOR 2.12, p = 0.007) and poor neonatal outcome (aOR 1.68, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer complications are seen after receiving antenatal care at tertiary facilities. Attending ≥8 visits reduced poor neonatal outcomes, but didn't impact maternal complications. Quality, not just quantity, of antenatal care is essential.

Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence from cross-sectional surveys on hidden caesarean sections among women with stillbirths in Ghana, 2007 and 2017.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates in women experiencing stillbirth have not been studied with nationally representative data. Two Ghana Maternal Health Surveys (GMHS) have captured pregnancy and mode of birth data for all women including those with stillbirths. We compared CS rates between women with live births and stillbirths, and identified socio-economic and pregnancy-related factors associated with CS in stillbirths. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in a pooled sample of 17 138 women who had given birth within 5 years preceding the 2007 and 2017 GMHS. CS rates were compared between women with stillbirths and very early neonatal deaths (SBVENDs) and women with live births who survived the first day. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions explored variables associated with CS. Effect modification of household's wealth and maternal educational level by birth outcome was assessed using multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms. RESULTS: CS rate in women with SBVEND was 19.3% compared with 9.6% in women with live births who survived the first day (rate ratio 2.2; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.9). In multivariable analysis, attaining middle school compared with no formal education (adjusted OR, aOR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 7.1), having had five or more births compared with nulliparity (aOR 3.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 10.7) and reporting prolonged or obstructed labour (aOR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 8.3) were associated with CS in women with SBVEND. Higher household wealth and educational levels were associated with an increased risk of CS in both study groups, with no statistically significant difference in effect. CONCLUSION: Disaggregating CS rates by birth outcome revealed a high rate among women with SBVEND, twice the overall rate compared with live births. Exclusion of these 'hidden' CSs from rate calculations may lead to underestimation of (inter)national CS rates and potentially conceals CS overuse or misuse.

Challenges to diagnosing and managing preeclampsia in a low-resource setting: A qualitative study of obstetric provider perspectives from Ghana.

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of global maternal morbidity and mortality. The greatest burden of disease is in low- and middle-income countries where healthcare providers face significant, understudied, challenges to diagnosing and managing preeclampsia. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to explore the challenges of diagnosing and managing preeclampsia from the perspectives of obstetric doctors. Participants were doctors who provide obstetric care at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, an urban tertiary hospital in Ghana. Purposive sampling identified doctors with meaningful experience in managing patients with preeclampsia. Thematic saturation of data was used to determine sample size. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded using an iteratively-developed codebook, and thematically analyzed. Interviews were conducted with 22 participants, consisting of 4 house officers, 6 junior obstetrics/gynecology residents, 8 senior obstetrics/gynecology residents, and 4 obstetrics/gynecology consultants. Doctors identified critical challenges faced at the patient, provider, and systems levels in detecting and managing preeclampsia, each of which mediates the health outcomes of a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Challenges centered around three overarching global themes: (1) low education levels and health literacy among women, (2) insufficient number of healthcare providers highly trained in obstetric care, and (3) inadequate health infrastructure to support critically ill patients with preeclampsia. Recognizing and addressing root challenges to preeclampsia care has great potential to improve outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia in low-resource settings.

Benefits and barriers of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: perspectives of obstetric doctors from a Ghanaian tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Delayed diagnosis of preeclampsia contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality. Patient-performed home blood pressure monitoring facilitates more frequent monitoring and earlier diagnosis. However, challenges may exist to implementation in low- and middle income-countries. METHODS: This cross-sectional mixed methods study evaluated obstetric doctors' perspectives on the benefits of and barriers to the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana. Participants were doctors providing obstetric care at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. Electronic surveys were completed by 75 participants (response rate 49.3%), consisting of demographics and questions on attitudes and perceived benefits and challenges of home BP monitoring. Semi-structured interviews were completed by 22 participants to expand on their perspectives. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative results converged to highlight that the current state of blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana is inadequate. The majority agreed that delayed diagnosis of preeclampsia leads to poor health outcomes in their patients (90.6%, n = 68) and earlier detection would improve outcomes (98.7%, n = 74). Key qualitative benefits to the adoption of home blood pressure monitoring were patient empowerment and trust of diagnosis, more quantity and quality of blood pressure data, and improvement in systems-level efficiency. The most significant barriers were the cost of monitors, lack of a communication system to convey abnormal values, and low health literacy. Overall, doctors felt that most barriers could be overcome with patient education and counseling, and that benefits far outweighed barriers. The majority of doctors (81.3%, n = 61), would use home BP data to inform their clinical decisions and 89% (n = 67) would take immediate action based on elevated home BP values. 91% (n = 68) would recommend home BP monitoring to their pregnant patients. CONCLUSION: Obstetric doctors in Ghana strongly support the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring, would use values to inform their clinical management, and believe it would improve patient outcomes. Addressing the most significant barriers, including cost of blood pressure monitors, lack of a communication system to convey abnormal values, and need for patient education, is essential for successful implementation.

Maternal Mortality in Low and Middle-Income Countries.

Despite a 38% decrease in global maternal mortality during the last decade, rates remain unacceptably high with greater than 800 maternal deaths occurring each day. There exists significant regional variation among rates and causes of maternal mortality, and the vast majority occurs in low-income and middle-income countries. The leading causes of direct maternal mortality are hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, sepsis, complications of abortion, and thromboembolism. Eliminating preventable maternal mortality hinges on improving clinical management of these life-threatening obstetric conditions, as well as addressing the complex social and economic barriers that pregnant women face to access quality care.

Clinical presentation and predictors of eclampsia among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ghana.

OBJECTIVES: Eclampsia is a leading contributor to global maternal morbidity and mortality. Past studies demonstrate varying relationships between demographic and antenatal factors and subsequent development of eclampsia. This study sought to identify predictors of eclampsia in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were women admitted to Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Ghana with a diagnosis of preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia. Medical and obstetric history were extracted from medical records. Clinical information, including vital signs and maternal complications, was prospectively collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bivariate analysis compared demographic, antenatal, obstetric history, and clinical characteristics between patients presenting with eclampsia and preeclampsia. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of eclampsia. RESULTS: Among 1,176 participants, 116 (9.9 %) had a diagnosis of eclampsia. The majority of women with eclampsia experienced their first seizure antepartum (68.7 %), in a location outside a health facility (56.5 %), and witnessed by a family member (55.9 %). Women with eclampsia had a median of 1.0 seizure (IQR 1.0, 2.0). Only 15 (12.9 %) had a prior diagnosis of preeclampsia. There was a nearly threefold increased odds of eclampsia in women aged <20 (aOR 2.75, 95 % CI 1.10-6.89, p = 0.03) and those with twin pregnancy (aOR 2.59, 95 % CI 1.26-5.32, p = 0.01). Decreased odds of eclampsia was observed with age ≥35 (aOR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.15-0.67, p = 0.002), obesity (aOR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.25-0.77, p = 0.004), and chronic hypertension (aOR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.17-0.86, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding predictors of eclampsia is important to identify high-risk patients and make informed decisions about antenatal care.

A comparative analysis of neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and eclampsia in Ghana.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a serious complication of pregnancy, and contribute to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. The most significant consequences of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are observed in sub-Saharan Africa, where neonatal outcomes have not been fully described. Understanding relationships between maternal disease severity and neonatal outcomes can guide patient counseling and allow the targeting of limited resources to the most at-risk neonates. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with severe features and eclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a secondary analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled trial at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital in Ghana. Participants were adult pregnant women with preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia and their neonates. Data include prospectively collected medical and obstetrical history, intrapartum events, and neonatal outcomes. The main outcome of this secondary analysis was a composite of poor neonatal outcomes, defined as 1 or more of the following: stillbirth, very low birthweight (<1500 g), 5-minute Apgar score <7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or a live birth with a subsequent death before discharge. RESULTS: Median gestational age at delivery was 36.6 weeks (interquartile range, 33.3-38.9). Median birthweight was 2.3 kg (interquartile range, 1.6-3.0), with 227 (19.0%) birthweights <1500 g. There were 162 neonates (15.5%) with an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes and 144 (11.9%) were stillbirths. Of live births, half (n=524, 50.3%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and 7.9% (n=91) died before discharge. A composite of poor neonatal outcomes was experienced by 58.2% (n=707) of neonates and was twice as likely with a maternal diagnosis of eclampsia (odds ratio, 1.91; P=.04). For each additional week of gestational age, the probability of a poor neonatal outcome was reduced by 39% (odds ratio, 0.61; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Poor neonatal outcomes were experienced by more than half of pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia. Even after controlling for gestational age, pregnancies complicated by eclampsia were twice as likely to have poor neonatal outcomes.

A novel 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate regimen in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia in Ghana (MOPEP Study): A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of a 12-h versus 24-h regimen of intramuscular magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia. METHODS: This is an open-labeled parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in Accra, Ghana from November 2018 to November 2020. Participants were adult pregnant women admitted to the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) with a diagnosis of antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum eclampsia or preeclampsia with severe features, having received no more than a loading dose of magnesium sulfate prior to admission at KBTH. Participants in the standard 24-h group received a loading dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g intravenous and 10 g intramuscular (5 g in each buttock) followed by six, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 24 h. Participants in the 12-h intervention group received the same loading dose followed by three, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 12 h. The primary outcome was occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned magnesium sulfate regimen. Secondary outcomes were magnesium sulfate toxicity, magnesium sulfate side effects, maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, duration of inpatient admission, duration of urethral catheterization), maternal complications (pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, death), and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1176 total participants, we found no difference in occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned regimen in the 24-h group (n = 5, 0.9%) versus the 12-h group (n = 2, 0.3%), P = 0.29; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08, 2.04), or in occurrence of seizure any time after enrollment (n = 9, 1.5% vs. n = 5, 0.9%, P = 0.28, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.64). Participants in the 12-h group had a shorter duration of inpatient admission (9.4 ± 8.8 vs. 7.7 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.0009) and urethral catheterization (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). Rates of side effects from magnesium sulfate were lower in the 12-h group: pain at the injection site (94.8% (n = 548) vs. 91.5% (n = 540), P = 0.03), inflammation (62.2% (n = 358) vs. 40.0% (n = 237), P < 0.0001), and bleeding or bruising at the injection site (25.1% (n = 144) vs. 14.4% (n = 85), P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 24 h, 12 h of intramuscular magnesium sulfate showed similar rates of seizures, with fewer side effects and shorter inpatient admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration was with Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201811515303983): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=4690.

The burden of COVID-19 infection on medical doctors in the first year of the pandemic in Ghana.

Objective: To quantify and describe the burden of COVID-19 infection amongst doctors in Ghana. Design: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of cross-sectional data was performed. Setting: All 16 regions in Ghana. Participants: Participants were medical doctors diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and March 2021. Main outcome measures: Data sources were Ghana Medical Association and Ministry of Health records. Demographics and workplace data included age, gender, the rank of the doctor, and location and type of current facility. Characteristics of the COVID-19 infection included the likely source, clinical and recovery status, and place of management. Doctors reported their desire for a general checkup and psychological support and described the challenges encountered. Results: The prevalence of COVID-19 infection was 88.9 cases per 1000 doctor-population. Of 544 infected doctors, 59.2% were stable but symptomatic, and 1.7% were in critical condition, with a case fatality rate of 1.7%. Overall, 31.6% had recovered from their COVID-19 infection, and the majority (82.4%) were managed at home in self-isolation. Compared to medical officers, house officers (OR 1.36, p=0.03), senior house officers (OR 7.60, p<0.001), and consultants (OR 2.94, p=0.001) were more likely to have a COVID-19 infection. Desire for support was varied, with 13.0% desiring someone to check on them and 9.7% desiring psychological support. The majority (75.3%) reported facing a challenge, including difficulty obtaining needed vitamins and medications, and accessing daily necessities like groceries. Conclusions: In Ghana, COVID-19 infections greatly burden medical doctors. Funding: None declared.

'I don't really understand this BP': Women's knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with preeclampsia in Ghana.

Preeclampsia and eclampsia are common and serious complications of pregnancies, often presenting as obstetric emergencies. In low- and middle-income countries, limited numbers of healthcare providers and a high volume of critically ill patients can negatively impact provider communication and counseling. Lack of knowledge or awareness of preeclampsia and eclampsia among pregnant women can lead to delays in health seeking behavior. Our study uses grounded theory to explore patients' experience of preeclampsia and eclampsia in a low-resource setting. Participants were postpartum women diagnosed with preeclampsia or eclampsia at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Ghana. Interviews consisted of semi-structured, open-ended questions regarding participant understanding of their diagnosis of preeclampsia and eclampsia; counseling from their healthcare providers; and experiences with their delivery, monitoring, and treatment. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed according to the Attride-Sterling analytical framework, using NVivo 12. A total of 45 women were interviewed, 88.9% with preeclampsia and 11.1% with eclampsia. Major themes identified include participants' low general knowledge of their diagnosis, inadequate counseling from healthcare providers, and resulting emotional distress. Women desire more information regarding their diagnosis and associate their health-seeking behaviors with counseling they receive from healthcare providers. Women also acknowledge the systemic barriers that make patient care and counseling challenging for providers, especially in low- and middle-income countries. These findings highlight the need for improved models of counseling and health education for women with pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Limiting adverse birth outcomes in resource-limited settings (LABOR): protocol of a prospective intrapartum cohort study.

Background: Each year, nearly 300,000 women and 5 million fetuses or neonates die during childbirth or shortly thereafter, a burden concentrated disproportionately in low- and middle-income countries. Identifying women and their fetuses at risk for intrapartum-related morbidity and death could facilitate early intervention. Methods: The Limiting Adverse Birth Outcomes in Resource-Limited Settings (LABOR) Study is a multi-country, prospective, observational cohort designed to exhaustively document the course and outcomes of labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum period in settings where adverse outcomes are frequent. The study is conducted at four hospitals across three countries in Ghana, India, and Zambia. We will enroll approximately 12,000 women at presentation to the hospital for delivery and follow them and their fetuses/newborns throughout their labor and delivery course, postpartum hospitalization, and up to 42 days thereafter. The co-primary outcomes are composites of maternal (death, hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, infection) and fetal/neonatal adverse events (death, encephalopathy, sepsis) that may be attributed to the intrapartum period. The study collects extensive physiologic data through the use of physiologic sensors and employs medical scribes to document examination findings, diagnoses, medications, and other interventions in real time. Discussion: The goal of this research is to produce a large, sharable dataset that can be used to build statistical algorithms to prospectively stratify parturients according to their risk of adverse outcomes. We anticipate this research will inform the development of new tools to reduce peripartum morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings.

Health Systems Factors Associated With Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Obstetric Clients in a Tertiary Health Care Facility in Ghana.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of an adverse event (AE) in obstetric clients receiving care in hospitals is greater than the risk of dying in aviation, road traffic accidents, and breast cancer. There is little understanding of AEs with respect to their causes at hospitals. The study aimed at assessing factors that are associated with the occurrence of AEs among hospitalized obstetric clients in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. METHOD: This was a case-control study of 650 obstetric clients (equal number in both arms) who were admitted between January 1 and December 31, 2015, at the study site. A retrospective review of the clients' medical records was randomly allocated into both arms of the study. Descriptive and inferential statistics including confirmatory factor analysis were performed. Models were evaluated for goodness-of-fit measures. The reliability and validity of the scale were also tested using Cronbach α coefficient. RESULTS: The mean gestational age of the clients was 37.4 ± 4.9 weeks. Leadership and governance (inadequate use of protocol and adherence) accounted for the most cause of AEs among obstetric clients. The overall Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin score was also 0.87. The scale also demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach α = 0.995; composite reliability > 0.7) and validity (average variance extraction > 0.50). There was a marginal model fit (root mean square error of approximation, 0.067), and the χ2 test was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate use of protocol and adherence is a major cause of preventable AEs identified in this study. There is an urgent need to address this to ensure a reduction in the prevalence of AEs among obstetric clients.