ABSTRACT
CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: A incontinência urinária (IU) é de causa multifatorial, sendo atribuída, em parte, à fraqueza da musculatura do assoalho pélvico. Apesar de ser subestimada por muitas mulheres, a avaliação funcional do assoalho pélvico (AFA) pode contribuir para um correto diagnóstico e terapêutica adequada. OBJETIVOS: Comparar a função muscular do assoalho pélvico em mulheres continentes e incontinentes na pós menopausa como fator diagnóstico no tratamento da IU. MÉTODOS: A partir da investigação dos sintomas urinários, 153 mulheres (idade X=66,7±5,4) foram separadas em dois grupos (G1 incontinentes e G2 assintomáticas). Após análise dos critérios de inclusão, as mulheres foram submetidas à AFA por meio da palpação bidigital (classificação de Contreras Ortis, 1994) e à quantificação da pressão de contração perineal por meio do perineômetro (PERINA 996-2® QUARK). RESULTADOS: Observou-se prevalência de IU (54,9 por cento) na amostra estudada, sendo a incontinência urinária de esforço (IUE) (41,7 por cento) o tipo mais presente. Em relação aos sintomas urinários, como a frequência miccional diurna (p=0,004) e noturna (p=0,02), o grupo G1 apresentou um valor significativamente mais alto. A AFA mostrou resultados similares durante a palpação e o perineômetro, com diferenças significativas (p<0,001) entre os dois grupos. Utilizou-se estatística descritiva, teste t de Student para amostras independentes, medidas de prevalência e análise de variância (one-way ANOVA), seguida do post hoc de Bonferroni (p<0,05). O software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) versão 10,0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) foi utilizado para realização de todas as análises. CONCLUSÕES: A palpação e o perineômetro se mostraram eficientes na avaliação da força e pressão de contração desse grupo muscular.
BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is multifactorial and attributed, in part, to weakness of the pelvic floor muscles. Despite being underestimated by many women, a functional pelvic floor assessment (FPA) may contribute to a correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare the function of pelvic floor muscles in continent and incontinent postmenopausal women as a diagnostic factor in UI treatment. METHODS: Based on the investigation of urinary symptoms, 153 women (age X=66.7±5.4) were divided into two groups (G1-incontinent and G2-continent). After analysis of the inclusion criteria, the women were submitted to FPA by means of bidigital palpation according to Contreras Ortiz (1994) and quantification of perineal strength with a perineometer (PERINA 996-2 QUARK®). RESULTS: There was prevalence of UI (54.9 percent) in the sample, with stress urinary incontinence (41.7 percent) as the most common. Regarding urinary symptoms such as diurnal (p=0.004) and nocturnal (p=0.02) voiding frequency, G1 had a significantly higher value. The FPA found similar results via palpation and the perineometer, with significant differences (p<0.001) between the two groups. We used descriptive statistics, the Student t test for independent samples, measures of prevalence and one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test (p<0.05). The software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used to perform all tests. CONCLUSIONS: Palpation and the perineometer were efficient forms of assessing the force and pressure of the muscle contractions of this muscle group.
ABSTRACT
This study examined the association between fat-free mass (FFM) and muscle strength with bone mineral density (BMD), and compared the BMD values between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic older women. After the exclusion criteria were applied, a total of 246 volunteers (age: 66.51+/-6.37 yr) participated in the analysis. Subjects underwent FFM and BMD evaluation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quadriceps strength by an isokinetic dynamometer. To address the potential for confounding by height, FFM values were considered relative to body height squared. For fat mass correction, fat-adjusted FFM was calculated. Individuals were classified as sarcopenic if their appendicular FFM was less than 5.45 kg/m2. All the evaluated FFM indexes were significantly correlated with the measured BMD sites. Sarcopenic individuals presented significantly lower whole body and trochanter BMD, and were significantly more prone to have low BMD. Muscle strength was also correlated with BMD sites; however, when it was expressed relative to body weight, the significance disappeared. Nevertheless, volunteers with low relative strength had higher risk of having low trochanter BMD. It can be concluded, in older women, that FFM is significantly correlated with BMD independently of height and fat mass. Muscle strength was also correlated with BMD, although the correlation was weaker when corrected for body weight. Finally, sarcopenic elderly women were more likely to have low BMD and muscle strength.
