Fracture risk and bone health in adrenal adenomas with mild autonomous cortisol secretion/subclinical Hypercortisolism: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Adrenal adenomas/incidentalomas with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS)/subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) are often associated with metabolic syndrome, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and fractures. In this background, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to collate the available evidence and provide a summary of effect of MACS/SH on bone health in terms of fractures, osteoporosis/osteopenia, microarchitecture, and bone turnover. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for observational studies reporting prevalence of fractures, osteoporosis/osteopenia or data on bone microarchitecture/bone turnover markers (BTMs). Following literature search, 16 observational studies were included. Pooled prevalence of any fractures (vertebral and non-vertebral), vertebral fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia in MACS/SH were 43% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 23%, 62%], 45% (95% CI: 22%, 68%) and 50% (95% CI: 33%, 66%), respectively. On meta-regression, age, sex, 24-hour urinary free cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate did not predict fracture risk. The likelihood of any fractures [odds ratio (OR) 1.61; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.20; p = 0.0026], vertebral fractures (OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28, 3.45; p = 0.0035) and osteoporosis/osteopenia (OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.85; p = 0.0018) was significantly higher in adrenal adenomas and MACS/SH than non-functional adrenal adenomas. Subjects with MACS/SH had significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine [mean difference (MD) -0.07 gm/cm2; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.03; p = 0.0004) and femoral neck (MD -0.05 gm/cm2; 95% CI: -0.08, -0.02; p = 0.0045) than their non-functional counterparts. Limited data showed no significant difference in BTMs. Publication bias was observed in the pooled prevalence of any fractures, vertebral fractures and pooled MD of femoral neck BMD. To conclude, people with adrenal adenomas/incidentalomas and MACS/SH are at 1.5 to 2-fold higher likelihood of fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia compared to non-functional adrenal adenomas and should routinely be screened for bone disease. Nevertheless, considering the modest sample size of studies and evidence of publication bias, larger and high-quality studies are required (CRD42023471045).

Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), often also referred to as subclinical hypercortisolism (SH), is usually associated with an underlying adrenal incidentaloma (AI), an adrenal mass incidentally found during abdomen imaging. Although signs of overt cortisol excess are lacking, subjects with MACS/SH often have features of metabolic syndrome, osteoporosis and fractures. The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of any fractures (vertebral and non-vertebral), vertebral fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia in MACS/SH were 43%, 45% and 50%, respectively. People with adrenal adenomas/incidentalomas and MACS/SH are at 1.5 to 2-fold higher likelihood of fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia compared to non-functional adrenal adenomas. Besides, subjects with MACS/SH had significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and femoral neck than their non-functional counterparts. It is thus imperative to assess bone health in all subjects with MACS/SH.

Risk of Gallstone Disease in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Apart from renal stones, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has been linked to the occurrence of gallstone disease (GSD). Nevertheless, the association is not consistent across all studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to collate the hitherto available evidence and provide a pooled estimate of the association between GSD and PHPT. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception till May 10, 2023 for observational studies reporting the prevalence of GSD (in terms of absolute numbers) in patients with PHPT. The pooled prevalence of GSD and odds ratio with 95% CI of the occurrence of GSD in patients with PHPT as compared to age- and sex-matched controls were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed based on patient ethnicity (Indian/Caucasian). Statistical analysis was carried out using R version 4.2.2. Random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp adjustment was used for analyses. RESULTS: A total of 7 observational studies were included, pooling data from 15 949 patients with PHPT. The pooled prevalence of GSD in patients with PHPT was 16% (95% CI: 7%, 25%, I2 = 99%), being 13% (95% CI: 0%, 66%, I2 = 76%) in Indians, and 17% (95% CI: 4%, 31%, I2 = 99%) in Caucasians. Data consolidated from 3 studies showed that the pooled odds ratio of occurrence of GSD in patients with PHPT compared to controls was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.60, 1.97, P < .001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: GSD is more prevalent in patients with PHPT than in the general population. Thus, PHPT may be considered an additional risk factor for GSD.

Non-biological Antiresorptive: Bisphosphonates.

Background: Bisphosphonates, synthetic analogs of endogenous pyrophosphates, are pivotal in managing various bone disorders, primarily osteoporosis, which affects millions globally. While osteoporosis, especially postmenopausal osteoporosis, significantly benefits from bisphosphonate therapy, considerations arise regarding their administration and potential side effects. Clinical application of Bisphosphonates: Bisphosphonates, divided into nitrogen-containing and non-nitrogenous groups, exert their influence through distinct mechanisms, with the former being notably more potent. The role of bisphosphonates in other diseases, such as Paget's bone and skeletal metastasis disease is also discussed. Detailed information on the administration routes, dosage regimens, and considerations for drug holidays is provided. The article navigates through the chemical structure, generations, and mechanism of action of bisphosphonates. The article covers administration routes, dosage regimens, and drug holidays, in addition to discussing potential adverse effects and contraindications. Conclusions: Bisphosphonates hold an unrivaled legacy in the management of osteoporosis. The ubiquitous availability and the cost-effectiveness of these time-tested medications make them an invaluable asset in the osteoporosis treatment landscape, especially in developing nations like India.